将富含二氧化碳的流体包裹体的拉曼分析作为基劳埃阿的大地晴雨表的可靠性

IF 3.4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochemical Perspectives Letters Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.7185/geochemlet.2404
C.L. DeVitre, P.E. Wieser
{"title":"将富含二氧化碳的流体包裹体的拉曼分析作为基劳埃阿的大地晴雨表的可靠性","authors":"C.L. DeVitre, P.E. Wieser","doi":"10.7185/geochemlet.2404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (<em>e.g.</em>, melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of K&amp;imacr;lauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions (&lt;10 mol % H<sub>2</sub>O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like K&amp;imacr;lauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.","PeriodicalId":12613,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Raman analyses of CO2-rich fluid inclusions as a geobarometer at Kīlauea\",\"authors\":\"C.L. DeVitre, P.E. Wieser\",\"doi\":\"10.7185/geochemlet.2404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (<em>e.g.</em>, melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of K&amp;imacr;lauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO<sub>2</sub>-dominated fluid inclusions (&lt;10 mol % H<sub>2</sub>O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like K&amp;imacr;lauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2404\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解读火山动荡的信号需要了解岩浆系统的结构,特别是岩浆储存的深度。这些信息对于帮助预测喷发方式和强度的变化至关重要。然而,用于评估岩浆储存深度的常用岩石学工具(如熔融包裹体)成本高昂、不确定性大,而且速度太慢,无法进行实时监测。在此,我们评估了拉曼光谱测量以二氧化碳为主的流体包裹体作为地质气压计的可靠性,以及微测温和熔融包裹体气压计的可靠性。我们计算了2018年K&imacr;lauea东裂谷带下段喷发的102个橄榄石寄存流体包裹体的储存压力,这些压力在统计上与熔融包裹体测定的压力没有区别。我们的研究表明,对于以二氧化碳为主的流体包裹体(<10 mol % H2O),校准拉曼光谱法得出的密度在微测温法的5-10%范围内,但对于像K&imacr;lauea这样以浅层岩浆贮存为主的系统,这种方法要合适得多。总之,通过拉曼光谱测定流体包裹体的压力是可靠的,所需的时间和资源只是熔融包裹体研究的一小部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of Raman analyses of CO2-rich fluid inclusions as a geobarometer at Kīlauea
Interpreting signals of volcanic unrest requires knowledge of the architecture of the magmatic system, particularly the depths at which magmas are stored. Such information can be vital to help predict changes in eruptive style and vigour. However, popular petrological tools to assess magma storage depths (e.g., melt inclusions) are costly, present large uncertainties, and are too slow for real time monitoring. Here, we evaluate the reliability of Raman Spectroscopy measurements of CO2-dominated fluid inclusions as a geobarometer relative to microthermometry and melt inclusion barometry. We calculate storage pressures for 102 olivine-hosted fluid inclusions from the 2018 Lower East Rift Zone eruption of K&imacr;lauea, which are statistically indistinguishable to those determined from melt inclusions. We show that calibrated Raman spectroscopy yields densities within 5–10 % of microthermometry for CO2-dominated fluid inclusions (<10 mol % H2O) but is a far more suitable method for systems like K&imacr;lauea dominated by shallow magma storage. Overall, pressures determined from fluid inclusions by Raman spectroscopy are robust and require only a fraction of the time and resources of melt inclusion studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochemical Perspectives Letters
Geochemical Perspectives Letters Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geochemistry and Petrology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochemical Perspectives Letters is an open access, internationally peer-reviewed journal of the European Association of Geochemistry (EAG) that publishes short, highest-quality articles spanning geochemical sciences. The journal aims at rapid publication of the most novel research in geochemistry with a focus on outstanding quality, international importance, originality, and stimulating new developments across the vast array of geochemical disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum 2 to "Inferred pyrite growth via the particle attachment pathway in the presence of trace metals" by Domingos et al., 2023 Australasian microtektites: early target-projectile interaction in large impacts on Earth Solubility of calcium carbonate hemihydrate (CCHH): Where does CCHH occur? Barium isotope evidence for a magmatic fluid-dominated petrogenesis of LCT-type pegmatites Subduction of sedimentary carbonate in the Mariana trench
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1