界定和报告老年人干预措施中的运动强度:改良德尔菲程序

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Review of Aging and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1186/s11556-024-00337-8
Bettina Wollesen, Mona Herden, Nicola Lamberti, Christoforos D. Giannaki
{"title":"界定和报告老年人干预措施中的运动强度:改良德尔菲程序","authors":"Bettina Wollesen, Mona Herden, Nicola Lamberti, Christoforos D. Giannaki","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00337-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many exercise studies, including older adults, do not report all relevant exercise characteristics. Especially the description of exercise intensity is missing and mostly not controlled. This leads to difficulties in interpreting study results and summarizing the evidence in systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Therefore, the aim of the present Delphi study was to gain recommendations about the categorization of exercise intensity and for the conducting and reporting of characteristics in future intervention studies with older adults by experts in exercise science and physiology. Two hundred ninety-seven international interdisciplinary participants from an EU COST action were invited to participate in three rounds of online questionnaires in April/May 2023. Up to N = 93 experts participated in each round. Round 1 included open-ended questions to solicit possible recommendations and categorizations for light, moderate, vigorous, and high intensity. In round 2, the experts rated their agreement using Likert scales (1–10) on the revealed categories and recommendations. Clusters with a higher average rating of M = 8.0 were summarized into round 3. In the final round, the results were presented for a final rating of agreement (based on a simple majority > 50%). In round 1 a total of 416 qualitative statements were provided from thirteen questions. From round 1 to round 3, a total of 38 items were excluded, with 205 items retained for the final consensus. In round three 37 participants completed the whole questionnaire. The experts showed overall agreement on the final categorizations with 6.7 to 8.8 out of 10 points on the Likert scale. They also showed broad consensus on the relevance of reporting exercise intensity and the recommendations for future conducting and reporting of study results. However, exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training led to conflicting results for categorization into light or moderate. The results of the current survey can be used to classify the intensity of exercise and suggest a practical approach that can be adopted by the scientific community and applied when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles when vital and objective information regarding exercise intensity is lacking from the original article. - Experts highlight the importance of reporting exercise intensity for individualization and participant safety - International interdisciplinary participants with expertise in exercise gained a common understanding of the categorization of exercise intensity for future intervention studies with older adults. - Conflicting results for exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training present categorization challenges","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and reporting exercise intensity in interventions for older adults: a modified Delphi process\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Wollesen, Mona Herden, Nicola Lamberti, Christoforos D. Giannaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s11556-024-00337-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many exercise studies, including older adults, do not report all relevant exercise characteristics. Especially the description of exercise intensity is missing and mostly not controlled. This leads to difficulties in interpreting study results and summarizing the evidence in systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Therefore, the aim of the present Delphi study was to gain recommendations about the categorization of exercise intensity and for the conducting and reporting of characteristics in future intervention studies with older adults by experts in exercise science and physiology. Two hundred ninety-seven international interdisciplinary participants from an EU COST action were invited to participate in three rounds of online questionnaires in April/May 2023. Up to N = 93 experts participated in each round. Round 1 included open-ended questions to solicit possible recommendations and categorizations for light, moderate, vigorous, and high intensity. In round 2, the experts rated their agreement using Likert scales (1–10) on the revealed categories and recommendations. Clusters with a higher average rating of M = 8.0 were summarized into round 3. In the final round, the results were presented for a final rating of agreement (based on a simple majority > 50%). In round 1 a total of 416 qualitative statements were provided from thirteen questions. From round 1 to round 3, a total of 38 items were excluded, with 205 items retained for the final consensus. In round three 37 participants completed the whole questionnaire. The experts showed overall agreement on the final categorizations with 6.7 to 8.8 out of 10 points on the Likert scale. They also showed broad consensus on the relevance of reporting exercise intensity and the recommendations for future conducting and reporting of study results. However, exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training led to conflicting results for categorization into light or moderate. The results of the current survey can be used to classify the intensity of exercise and suggest a practical approach that can be adopted by the scientific community and applied when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles when vital and objective information regarding exercise intensity is lacking from the original article. - Experts highlight the importance of reporting exercise intensity for individualization and participant safety - International interdisciplinary participants with expertise in exercise gained a common understanding of the categorization of exercise intensity for future intervention studies with older adults. - Conflicting results for exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training present categorization challenges\",\"PeriodicalId\":50477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00337-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00337-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括老年人在内的许多运动研究都没有报告所有相关的运动特征。尤其是对运动强度的描述缺失,而且大多没有进行控制。这给解释研究结果和总结系统综述或荟萃分析中的证据带来了困难。因此,本德尔菲研究的目的是由运动科学和生理学专家就运动强度的分类以及未来针对老年人的干预研究的开展和特征报告提出建议。来自欧盟 COST 行动的 297 名国际跨学科参与者受邀参加了 2023 年 4 月/5 月的三轮在线问卷调查。每一轮最多有 N = 93 名专家参与。第 1 轮包括开放式问题,以征求可能的建议,并对轻度、中度、剧烈和高强度进行分类。在第二轮中,专家们使用李克特量表(1-10)对所揭示的类别和建议进行评分。平均评分 M = 8.0 较高的群组被汇总到第 3 轮。在最后一轮中,专家们给出了最终的同意度(基于简单多数>50%)。在第一轮中,13 个问题共提供了 416 个定性陈述。从第一轮到第三轮,共剔除了 38 个项目,保留了 205 个项目以达成最终共识。在第三轮中,37 名参与者完成了整个问卷。专家们对最终分类的总体意见一致,利克特量表满分为 6.7 至 8.8 分(满分为 10 分)。他们还就报告运动强度的相关性以及今后开展和报告研究结果的建议达成了广泛共识。然而,瑜伽、平衡和协调训练等运动类型导致了轻度或中度运动分类结果的冲突。本次调查的结果可用于对运动强度进行分类,并提出了一种实用的方法,可供科学界采用,并在进行系统综述和荟萃分析文章时,当原始文章中缺乏有关运动强度的重要客观信息时加以应用。- 专家们强调了报告运动强度对个体化和参与者安全的重要性--具有运动专业知识的国际跨学科参与者就运动强度的分类达成了共识,以便今后对老年人进行干预研究。- 瑜伽、平衡和协调训练等运动类型的结果相互矛盾,给分类带来了挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining and reporting exercise intensity in interventions for older adults: a modified Delphi process
Many exercise studies, including older adults, do not report all relevant exercise characteristics. Especially the description of exercise intensity is missing and mostly not controlled. This leads to difficulties in interpreting study results and summarizing the evidence in systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Therefore, the aim of the present Delphi study was to gain recommendations about the categorization of exercise intensity and for the conducting and reporting of characteristics in future intervention studies with older adults by experts in exercise science and physiology. Two hundred ninety-seven international interdisciplinary participants from an EU COST action were invited to participate in three rounds of online questionnaires in April/May 2023. Up to N = 93 experts participated in each round. Round 1 included open-ended questions to solicit possible recommendations and categorizations for light, moderate, vigorous, and high intensity. In round 2, the experts rated their agreement using Likert scales (1–10) on the revealed categories and recommendations. Clusters with a higher average rating of M = 8.0 were summarized into round 3. In the final round, the results were presented for a final rating of agreement (based on a simple majority > 50%). In round 1 a total of 416 qualitative statements were provided from thirteen questions. From round 1 to round 3, a total of 38 items were excluded, with 205 items retained for the final consensus. In round three 37 participants completed the whole questionnaire. The experts showed overall agreement on the final categorizations with 6.7 to 8.8 out of 10 points on the Likert scale. They also showed broad consensus on the relevance of reporting exercise intensity and the recommendations for future conducting and reporting of study results. However, exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training led to conflicting results for categorization into light or moderate. The results of the current survey can be used to classify the intensity of exercise and suggest a practical approach that can be adopted by the scientific community and applied when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles when vital and objective information regarding exercise intensity is lacking from the original article. - Experts highlight the importance of reporting exercise intensity for individualization and participant safety - International interdisciplinary participants with expertise in exercise gained a common understanding of the categorization of exercise intensity for future intervention studies with older adults. - Conflicting results for exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training present categorization challenges
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
期刊最新文献
Identifying exercise and cognitive intervention parameters to optimize executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. The work Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise program for preventing functional decline in employees aged 55 years and older: development and initial evaluation. Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study. Multimodal training protocols on unstable rather than stable surfaces better improve dynamic balance ability in older adults. Exploring the complex associations among risks of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and frailty in community-dwelling older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1