使用不同器械进行类似于第三磨牙拔除术的去骨过程中的温度变化

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011
G.B. Bisson, I.M. Sanches, N.O. Ciaramicolo, O. Ferreira Junior
{"title":"使用不同器械进行类似于第三磨牙拔除术的去骨过程中的温度变化","authors":"G.B. Bisson,&nbsp;I.M. Sanches,&nbsp;N.O. Ciaramicolo,&nbsp;O. Ferreira Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bone removal is commonly used in the extraction of third molars and the heat generated during the process can interfere with the repair of bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temperature variation presented in bone removal performed with a high-speed turbine (400000 rpm), implant motor with straight piece (100000 rpm), low-speed micromotor (20000 rpm) and piezoelectric saw (30 kHz) in pig mandibles. For this, bone removal was carried out around 20 posterior teeth, under constant saline solution irrigation with a syringe and needle. In addition, the time required to perform bone removal was recorded. The results indicated a mean (SD) temperature variation of 0.96 °C (0.6 °C) for the high-speed turbine, 1.38 °C (0.5 °C) with the implant motor, 2.22 °C (0.7 °C) for the low-speed micromotor and 2.90 °C (1.3 °C) for the piezoelectric saw. The conventional variance was calculated discounting the variation of time used for bone removal around the teeth. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the high-speed turbine vs the micromotor (<em>p</em> = 0.009) and the high speed micromotor vs the piezoelectric saw (<em>p</em> = 0.04). We conclude that there is a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the instruments used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with higher rotation speeds resulting in the lowest temperature variations and a reduced surgical time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments\",\"authors\":\"G.B. Bisson,&nbsp;I.M. Sanches,&nbsp;N.O. Ciaramicolo,&nbsp;O. Ferreira Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bone removal is commonly used in the extraction of third molars and the heat generated during the process can interfere with the repair of bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temperature variation presented in bone removal performed with a high-speed turbine (400000 rpm), implant motor with straight piece (100000 rpm), low-speed micromotor (20000 rpm) and piezoelectric saw (30 kHz) in pig mandibles. For this, bone removal was carried out around 20 posterior teeth, under constant saline solution irrigation with a syringe and needle. In addition, the time required to perform bone removal was recorded. The results indicated a mean (SD) temperature variation of 0.96 °C (0.6 °C) for the high-speed turbine, 1.38 °C (0.5 °C) with the implant motor, 2.22 °C (0.7 °C) for the low-speed micromotor and 2.90 °C (1.3 °C) for the piezoelectric saw. The conventional variance was calculated discounting the variation of time used for bone removal around the teeth. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the high-speed turbine vs the micromotor (<em>p</em> = 0.009) and the high speed micromotor vs the piezoelectric saw (<em>p</em> = 0.04). We conclude that there is a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the instruments used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with higher rotation speeds resulting in the lowest temperature variations and a reduced surgical time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435624000172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435624000172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨切除通常用于第三磨牙的拔除,在此过程中产生的热量会影响骨修复。本研究的目的是评估猪下颌骨在使用高速涡轮机(400,000rpm)、带直片的种植电机(100,000rpm)、低速微电机(20,000rpm)和压电锯(30kHz)进行骨去除时的温度变化。为此,在使用注射器和针头持续灌注生理盐水的情况下,对 20 颗后牙周围进行了骨清除。此外,还记录了进行骨去除所需的时间。结果表明,高速涡轮机的平均温度变化和标准偏差分别为 0.96°C (0.6°C),种植马达的平均温度变化和标准偏差分别为 1.38°C (0.5°C),低速微电机的平均温度变化和标准偏差分别为 2.22°C (0.7°C),压电陶瓷的平均温度变化和标准偏差分别为 2.90°C (1.3°C)。常规方差的计算扣除了去除牙齿周围骨质所用时间的变化。高速涡轮机与微电机(p=0,00)和高速与压电式(p=0,04)之间的温度变化差异具有统计学意义。我们的结论是,口腔颌面外科所用器械之间的温度变化有显著的统计学差异,转速越高,温度变化越小,手术时间越短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments

Bone removal is commonly used in the extraction of third molars and the heat generated during the process can interfere with the repair of bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temperature variation presented in bone removal performed with a high-speed turbine (400000 rpm), implant motor with straight piece (100000 rpm), low-speed micromotor (20000 rpm) and piezoelectric saw (30 kHz) in pig mandibles. For this, bone removal was carried out around 20 posterior teeth, under constant saline solution irrigation with a syringe and needle. In addition, the time required to perform bone removal was recorded. The results indicated a mean (SD) temperature variation of 0.96 °C (0.6 °C) for the high-speed turbine, 1.38 °C (0.5 °C) with the implant motor, 2.22 °C (0.7 °C) for the low-speed micromotor and 2.90 °C (1.3 °C) for the piezoelectric saw. The conventional variance was calculated discounting the variation of time used for bone removal around the teeth. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the high-speed turbine vs the micromotor (p = 0.009) and the high speed micromotor vs the piezoelectric saw (p = 0.04). We conclude that there is a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the instruments used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with higher rotation speeds resulting in the lowest temperature variations and a reduced surgical time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Training groups / Instructions to Authors Comment on: Risk prediction of complicated course in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction. Extreme and remarkable adaptations of oral cancer survivors in Sri Lanka. Outcomes of incidental pulmonary nodules detected in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1