从解放的角度看社区参与的职业研究方法框架

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Vocational Behavior Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103970
Yunkyoung Loh Garrison , Germán A. Cadenas , Saba Rasheed Ali
{"title":"从解放的角度看社区参与的职业研究方法框架","authors":"Yunkyoung Loh Garrison ,&nbsp;Germán A. Cadenas ,&nbsp;Saba Rasheed Ali","doi":"10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the broadening scope of research inquiries into work, employment, industrial and organizational processes, and vocational development addressing issues with systemic oppression, there is a pressing need for discussion on using research methodologies as tools for catalyzing liberatory change. This article is underpinned by liberation theories and perspectives, which critically examine the Euro-American systems of thoughts that justify and perpetuate decisions, conditions, and culture that may exclude marginalized knowers, knowledge, and ways of knowing. Building on the work of other liberation scholars, we propose a new framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies, which expands the existing methodologies: a) from <em>distance</em> to <em>proximity</em>, b) from <em>academic capitalism</em> to <em>community vocational outcomes</em>, c) from <em>researcher authority</em> to <em>community partnership,</em> and d) from <em>theoretical knowledge</em> to <em>actionable knowledge</em>. We discuss guiding Global Majority values to address tensions that may arise from expanding and complicating the traditional boundaries of methodologies. The framework also shows expansion through intersectional, interdisciplinary, anti-oppressive, and action-oriented approaches. With the introduction of this framework, we invite readers to broaden the scope of research methodologies and transform them into processes and tools for people who generate, need, and use the community-based knowledge of work and working.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 103970"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies from liberatory perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Yunkyoung Loh Garrison ,&nbsp;Germán A. Cadenas ,&nbsp;Saba Rasheed Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the broadening scope of research inquiries into work, employment, industrial and organizational processes, and vocational development addressing issues with systemic oppression, there is a pressing need for discussion on using research methodologies as tools for catalyzing liberatory change. This article is underpinned by liberation theories and perspectives, which critically examine the Euro-American systems of thoughts that justify and perpetuate decisions, conditions, and culture that may exclude marginalized knowers, knowledge, and ways of knowing. Building on the work of other liberation scholars, we propose a new framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies, which expands the existing methodologies: a) from <em>distance</em> to <em>proximity</em>, b) from <em>academic capitalism</em> to <em>community vocational outcomes</em>, c) from <em>researcher authority</em> to <em>community partnership,</em> and d) from <em>theoretical knowledge</em> to <em>actionable knowledge</em>. We discuss guiding Global Majority values to address tensions that may arise from expanding and complicating the traditional boundaries of methodologies. The framework also shows expansion through intersectional, interdisciplinary, anti-oppressive, and action-oriented approaches. With the introduction of this framework, we invite readers to broaden the scope of research methodologies and transform them into processes and tools for people who generate, need, and use the community-based knowledge of work and working.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vocational Behavior\",\"volume\":\"149 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vocational Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879124000113\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879124000113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着对工作、就业、工业和组织过程以及职业发展的研究调查范围不断扩大,涉及到系统性压迫问题,因此迫切需要讨论如何将研究方法作为促进解放变革的工具。本文以解放理论和观点为基础,批判性地审视了欧美思想体系,这些思想体系为可能排斥边缘化知识分子、知识和认知方式的决策、条件和文化提供了理由,并使之长期存在。在其他解放学者工作的基础上,我们提出了社区参与职业研究方法的新框架,扩展了现有方法:a) 从距离到接近;b) 从学术资本主义到社区职业成果;c) 从研究者权威到社区伙伴关系;d) 从理论知识到可操作知识。我们讨论了 "全球多数派 "的指导价值观,以解决方法论传统界限的扩展和复杂化可能产生的紧张关系。该框架还显示了通过交叉、跨学科、反压迫和以行动为导向的方法进行的扩展。通过引入本框架,我们邀请读者拓宽研究方法论的范围,并将其转化为产生、需要和使用以社区为基础的工作和工作知识的过程和工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies from liberatory perspectives

With the broadening scope of research inquiries into work, employment, industrial and organizational processes, and vocational development addressing issues with systemic oppression, there is a pressing need for discussion on using research methodologies as tools for catalyzing liberatory change. This article is underpinned by liberation theories and perspectives, which critically examine the Euro-American systems of thoughts that justify and perpetuate decisions, conditions, and culture that may exclude marginalized knowers, knowledge, and ways of knowing. Building on the work of other liberation scholars, we propose a new framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies, which expands the existing methodologies: a) from distance to proximity, b) from academic capitalism to community vocational outcomes, c) from researcher authority to community partnership, and d) from theoretical knowledge to actionable knowledge. We discuss guiding Global Majority values to address tensions that may arise from expanding and complicating the traditional boundaries of methodologies. The framework also shows expansion through intersectional, interdisciplinary, anti-oppressive, and action-oriented approaches. With the introduction of this framework, we invite readers to broaden the scope of research methodologies and transform them into processes and tools for people who generate, need, and use the community-based knowledge of work and working.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Journal of Vocational Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Behavior publishes original empirical and theoretical articles offering unique insights into the realms of career choice, career development, and work adjustment across the lifespan. These contributions are not only valuable for academic exploration but also find applications in counseling and career development programs across diverse sectors such as colleges, universities, business, industry, government, and the military. The primary focus of the journal centers on individual decision-making regarding work and careers, prioritizing investigations into personal career choices rather than organizational or employer-level variables. Example topics encompass a broad range, from initial career choices (e.g., choice of major, initial work or organization selection, organizational attraction) to the development of a career, work transitions, work-family management, and attitudes within the workplace (such as work commitment, multiple role management, and turnover).
期刊最新文献
Does grade point average have a long-lasting impact on career success later in life? A resource caravans' perspective from adolescence to mid-career Give it your all or hardly give? The role of mentors' beliefs about protégé advancement potential and gender in mentoring relationships Are they more proactive or less engaged? Understanding employees' career proactivity after promotion failure through an attribution lens Humble leader, successful follower: Linking leader humility with follower career outcomes via leader competence from an implicit leadership theory perspective The psychological experience of flexibility in the workplace: How psychological job control and boundary control profiles relate to the wellbeing of flexible workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1