HFA/ICOS 评分在预测乳腺癌化疗相关心功能不全中的附加值。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001589
Daniela Di Lisi, Cristina Madaudo, Denise Cristiana Faro, Ludovico Rossetto, Oreste Fabio Triolo, Valentina Losi, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Ines Paola Monte, Giuseppina Novo
{"title":"HFA/ICOS 评分在预测乳腺癌化疗相关心功能不全中的附加值。","authors":"Daniela Di Lisi, Cristina Madaudo, Denise Cristiana Faro, Ludovico Rossetto, Oreste Fabio Triolo, Valentina Losi, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Ines Paola Monte, Giuseppina Novo","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology recommend baseline cardiovascular risk stratification before starting anticancer drugs, using the new risk assessment tools proposed by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS).Our study aimed to assess the clinical application of HFA/ICOS risk score in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and its usefulness in predicting the development of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentric study enrolled 109 breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab. A cardiological evaluation, including ECG and echocardiogram at baseline (T0), 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3) after starting treatment was performed. HFA/ICOS score was assessed in all patients. The population was divided into low, medium, high, and very-high risk.During follow-up, CTRCD and other cardiovascular events have been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>61 patients were low risk, 37 medium, 9 high, 2 very-high risk criteria. We found a significantly higher incidence of overall cardiotoxicity (CTRCD and other cardiovascular events) in the very-high risk group (100%) compared with the medium (29%) and low risk groups (13%). CTRCD incidence was also significantly higher in the high risk group (55%). CTRCD resulted as being associated with baseline arterial hypertension and baseline HFA/ICOS risk score of high ( p  = 0.006) or very-high ( p  < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms the HFA/ICOS score's ability to predict cardiovascular toxicity in breast cancer women and the need for close monitoring especially in high and very-high risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"218-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The added value of the HFA/ICOS score in the prediction of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Di Lisi, Cristina Madaudo, Denise Cristiana Faro, Ludovico Rossetto, Oreste Fabio Triolo, Valentina Losi, Alfredo Ruggero Galassi, Ines Paola Monte, Giuseppina Novo\",\"doi\":\"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology recommend baseline cardiovascular risk stratification before starting anticancer drugs, using the new risk assessment tools proposed by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS).Our study aimed to assess the clinical application of HFA/ICOS risk score in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and its usefulness in predicting the development of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective multicentric study enrolled 109 breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab. A cardiological evaluation, including ECG and echocardiogram at baseline (T0), 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3) after starting treatment was performed. HFA/ICOS score was assessed in all patients. The population was divided into low, medium, high, and very-high risk.During follow-up, CTRCD and other cardiovascular events have been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>61 patients were low risk, 37 medium, 9 high, 2 very-high risk criteria. We found a significantly higher incidence of overall cardiotoxicity (CTRCD and other cardiovascular events) in the very-high risk group (100%) compared with the medium (29%) and low risk groups (13%). CTRCD incidence was also significantly higher in the high risk group (55%). CTRCD resulted as being associated with baseline arterial hypertension and baseline HFA/ICOS risk score of high ( p  = 0.006) or very-high ( p  < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study confirms the HFA/ICOS score's ability to predict cardiovascular toxicity in breast cancer women and the need for close monitoring especially in high and very-high risk patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的研究旨在评估HFA/ICOS风险评分在接受化疗的乳腺癌患者中的临床应用,以及其在预测化疗相关心功能不全(CTRCD)发生方面的作用:一项前瞻性多中心研究共纳入了109名接受蒽环类药物联合或不联合曲妥珠单抗治疗的乳腺癌患者。在开始治疗后的基线(T0)、3 个月(T1)、6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T3)进行了心脏学评估,包括心电图和超声心动图。对所有患者进行了 HFA/ICOS 评分,并将人群分为低危、中危、高危和极高危:结果:61 名患者符合低风险标准,37 名患者符合中风险标准,9 名患者符合高风险标准,2 名患者符合极高风险标准。我们发现,与中度风险组(29%)和低度风险组(13%)相比,高度风险组(100%)的总体心脏毒性(CTRCD 和其他心血管事件)发生率明显更高。高风险组的 CTRCD 发生率也明显更高(55%)。CTRCD 与基线动脉高血压和基线 HFA/ICOS 风险评分为高(P = 0.006)或极高(P 结论:我们的研究证实了 HFA/ICOS 风险评分为高风险组(100%)与中风险组(29%)和低风险组(13%)之间的相关性:我们的研究证实了 HFA/ICOS 评分预测乳腺癌妇女心血管毒性的能力,以及对高风险和极高风险患者进行密切监测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The added value of the HFA/ICOS score in the prediction of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer.

Background: The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology recommend baseline cardiovascular risk stratification before starting anticancer drugs, using the new risk assessment tools proposed by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS).Our study aimed to assess the clinical application of HFA/ICOS risk score in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and its usefulness in predicting the development of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD).

Methods: A prospective multicentric study enrolled 109 breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab. A cardiological evaluation, including ECG and echocardiogram at baseline (T0), 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3) after starting treatment was performed. HFA/ICOS score was assessed in all patients. The population was divided into low, medium, high, and very-high risk.During follow-up, CTRCD and other cardiovascular events have been evaluated.

Results: 61 patients were low risk, 37 medium, 9 high, 2 very-high risk criteria. We found a significantly higher incidence of overall cardiotoxicity (CTRCD and other cardiovascular events) in the very-high risk group (100%) compared with the medium (29%) and low risk groups (13%). CTRCD incidence was also significantly higher in the high risk group (55%). CTRCD resulted as being associated with baseline arterial hypertension and baseline HFA/ICOS risk score of high ( p  = 0.006) or very-high ( p  < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our study confirms the HFA/ICOS score's ability to predict cardiovascular toxicity in breast cancer women and the need for close monitoring especially in high and very-high risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Changes and prognostic impact of noninvasive myocardial work indices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Competing stroke mechanisms despite adequate oral anticoagulant therapy: the role of transesophageal echocardiography. Impact of symptom-to-balloon time in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions. Left bundle branch pacing for atrio-ventricular block after heart transplant: a safe and effective therapy? Type B aortic dissection in a patient with aberrant right vertebral artery and Kommerell-like diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1