针对使用儿童和青少年心理健康服务的儿童和青少年的候诊干预:系统性综述。

0 PSYCHIATRY BMJ mental health Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844
Althea Z Valentine, Sophie S Hall, Kapil Sayal, Charlotte L Hall
{"title":"针对使用儿童和青少年心理健康服务的儿童和青少年的候诊干预:系统性综述。","authors":"Althea Z Valentine, Sophie S Hall, Kapil Sayal, Charlotte L Hall","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Children and young people experience delays in assessment and/or treatment within mental health services. The objective of this systematic review, funded by the Emerging Minds Network, was to explore the current evidence base for mental health waiting list interventions to support children and young people.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2023 (last searched October 2023). Included studies described interventions to support children and young people and/or their family while on a waiting list for child and adolescent mental health services. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers, data were extracted by one reviewer, confirmed by a second and a narrative synthesis was provided.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Eighteen studies including 1253 children and young people were identified. Studies described waiting list interventions for autism spectrum disorders, eating disorders, generic conditions, transgender health, anxiety/depression, self-harm and suicide and behavioural issues. Many interventions were multicomponent; 94% involved psychoeducation, other components included parental support, bibliotherapy and coaching. Duration of the interventions ranged from a single session to over a year; 66% involved face-to-face contact. All studies demonstrated benefits in terms of improved clinical outcomes and/or feasibility/acceptability. Evidence for service outcomes/efficiency was largely unexplored. Limitations of the underpinning research, such as sample size and low-quality papers, limit the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited research exploring waiting list interventions, however, the findings from small-scale studies are promising. Further research using robust study designs and real-world implementation studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waiting-list interventions for children and young people using child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Althea Z Valentine, Sophie S Hall, Kapil Sayal, Charlotte L Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Question: </strong>Children and young people experience delays in assessment and/or treatment within mental health services. The objective of this systematic review, funded by the Emerging Minds Network, was to explore the current evidence base for mental health waiting list interventions to support children and young people.</p><p><strong>Study selection and analysis: </strong>A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2023 (last searched October 2023). Included studies described interventions to support children and young people and/or their family while on a waiting list for child and adolescent mental health services. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers, data were extracted by one reviewer, confirmed by a second and a narrative synthesis was provided.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Eighteen studies including 1253 children and young people were identified. Studies described waiting list interventions for autism spectrum disorders, eating disorders, generic conditions, transgender health, anxiety/depression, self-harm and suicide and behavioural issues. Many interventions were multicomponent; 94% involved psychoeducation, other components included parental support, bibliotherapy and coaching. Duration of the interventions ranged from a single session to over a year; 66% involved face-to-face contact. All studies demonstrated benefits in terms of improved clinical outcomes and/or feasibility/acceptability. Evidence for service outcomes/efficiency was largely unexplored. Limitations of the underpinning research, such as sample size and low-quality papers, limit the findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited research exploring waiting list interventions, however, the findings from small-scale studies are promising. Further research using robust study designs and real-world implementation studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题儿童和青少年在接受心理健康服务的评估和/或治疗时会遇到延误。本系统性综述由新兴心灵网络(Emerging Minds Network)资助,旨在探索当前心理健康候诊名单干预措施的证据基础,为儿童和青少年提供支持:我们在 2000 年至 2023 年(最后一次检索时间为 2023 年 10 月)的 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行了文献检索。纳入的研究描述了在儿童和青少年心理健康服务候诊名单上为儿童、青少年和/或其家人提供支持的干预措施。标题和摘要由两名审稿人独立筛选,数据由一名审稿人提取,由另一名审稿人确认,并进行叙述性综合:研究结果:共确定了 18 项研究,涉及 1253 名儿童和青少年。研究介绍了针对自闭症谱系障碍、饮食失调、一般疾病、变性人健康、焦虑/抑郁、自残和自杀以及行为问题的候选干预措施。许多干预措施由多个部分组成;94%涉及心理教育,其他部分包括家长支持、书目疗法和辅导。干预的持续时间从一个疗程到一年多不等,66%的干预涉及面对面接触。所有研究都证明了干预在改善临床结果和/或可行性/可接受性方面的益处。而有关服务成果/效率的证据则大多未作探讨。基础研究的局限性,如样本量和低质量论文,限制了研究结果:关于候补名单干预措施的研究有限,但小规模研究的结果很有希望。有必要利用可靠的研究设计和真实世界的实施研究开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Waiting-list interventions for children and young people using child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review.

Question: Children and young people experience delays in assessment and/or treatment within mental health services. The objective of this systematic review, funded by the Emerging Minds Network, was to explore the current evidence base for mental health waiting list interventions to support children and young people.

Study selection and analysis: A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2023 (last searched October 2023). Included studies described interventions to support children and young people and/or their family while on a waiting list for child and adolescent mental health services. Titles and abstracts were screened independently by two reviewers, data were extracted by one reviewer, confirmed by a second and a narrative synthesis was provided.

Findings: Eighteen studies including 1253 children and young people were identified. Studies described waiting list interventions for autism spectrum disorders, eating disorders, generic conditions, transgender health, anxiety/depression, self-harm and suicide and behavioural issues. Many interventions were multicomponent; 94% involved psychoeducation, other components included parental support, bibliotherapy and coaching. Duration of the interventions ranged from a single session to over a year; 66% involved face-to-face contact. All studies demonstrated benefits in terms of improved clinical outcomes and/or feasibility/acceptability. Evidence for service outcomes/efficiency was largely unexplored. Limitations of the underpinning research, such as sample size and low-quality papers, limit the findings.

Conclusions: There is limited research exploring waiting list interventions, however, the findings from small-scale studies are promising. Further research using robust study designs and real-world implementation studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes in sleep patterns in people with a history of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a natural experiment. Mediation-adjusted multivariable Mendelian randomisation study identified novel metabolites related to mental health. Identifying postpartum depression: Using key risk factors for early detection. Using the South African Depression Scale (SADS) to measure depressive symptoms in a UK sample. Cumulative ADHD medication use and risk of type 2 diabetes in adults: a Swedish Register study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1