关节镜肩袖修复术中连续臂丛神经疤痕间阻滞的效果

Tomohiro Uno , Nariyuki Mura , Issei Yuki , Ryuta Oishi , Michiaki Takagi
{"title":"关节镜肩袖修复术中连续臂丛神经疤痕间阻滞的效果","authors":"Tomohiro Uno ,&nbsp;Nariyuki Mura ,&nbsp;Issei Yuki ,&nbsp;Ryuta Oishi ,&nbsp;Michiaki Takagi","doi":"10.1016/j.asmart.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a minimally invasive surgical technique. However, it is challenging to control postoperative pain. This study aimed to investigate the difference between a single-shot interscalene block and a combined continuous block for ARCR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety-four patients who underwent ARCR were included in this study. In the preceding period, 43 patients received a single-shot interscalene block and continuous postoperative intravenous opioid infusion (Single group). In the posterior period, 51 patients received a single-shot interscalene block preoperatively and a continuous block postoperatively (Continuous group). Their mean age at surgery was 64.9 years (range, 43–83 years). The mean follow-up period was 25.4 months (range, 24–54 months). The numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain was evaluated immediately after the surgery, at rest, and at night for 1–4 days after the surgery. One day postoperatively, the amount of food taken was assessed from 0 % (no food intake) to 100 % (all food taken). The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, range of motion (ROM), and isometric shoulder strength were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the day of surgery was 3.7 ± 2.5. This was significantly lower than in the Single group (5.2 ± 1.8) (<em>P</em> = 0.002). NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the second day after surgery was 3.0 ± 2.1, significantly lower than in the Single group (3.9 ± 1.8) (<em>P</em> = 0.04). The amount of food taken in the morning in the Continuous group was 61 % ± 37 %, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (35 % ± 41 %) (<em>P</em> = 0.004). The ROM of extension at 6 months postoperatively in the Continuous group was 47 ± 7°, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (43 ± 6°) (<em>P =</em> 0.02). The postoperative strength of the external rotator at 6 months in the Continuous group was 95 ± 33 N, significantly greater than in the Single group (78 ± 28 N) (<em>P</em> = 0.01). There was no significant difference in UCLA score at any time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The continuous interscalene block with ultrasound guidance in ARCR effectively relieved pain. The recovery of ROM for extension and the strength of the external rotator was better in the Continuous group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44283,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","volume":"36 ","pages":"Pages 6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687324000049/pdfft?md5=8baa9211d10237229461c1aeefddff57&pid=1-s2.0-S2214687324000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Uno ,&nbsp;Nariyuki Mura ,&nbsp;Issei Yuki ,&nbsp;Ryuta Oishi ,&nbsp;Michiaki Takagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmart.2024.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a minimally invasive surgical technique. However, it is challenging to control postoperative pain. This study aimed to investigate the difference between a single-shot interscalene block and a combined continuous block for ARCR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety-four patients who underwent ARCR were included in this study. In the preceding period, 43 patients received a single-shot interscalene block and continuous postoperative intravenous opioid infusion (Single group). In the posterior period, 51 patients received a single-shot interscalene block preoperatively and a continuous block postoperatively (Continuous group). Their mean age at surgery was 64.9 years (range, 43–83 years). The mean follow-up period was 25.4 months (range, 24–54 months). The numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain was evaluated immediately after the surgery, at rest, and at night for 1–4 days after the surgery. One day postoperatively, the amount of food taken was assessed from 0 % (no food intake) to 100 % (all food taken). The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, range of motion (ROM), and isometric shoulder strength were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the day of surgery was 3.7 ± 2.5. This was significantly lower than in the Single group (5.2 ± 1.8) (<em>P</em> = 0.002). NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the second day after surgery was 3.0 ± 2.1, significantly lower than in the Single group (3.9 ± 1.8) (<em>P</em> = 0.04). The amount of food taken in the morning in the Continuous group was 61 % ± 37 %, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (35 % ± 41 %) (<em>P</em> = 0.004). The ROM of extension at 6 months postoperatively in the Continuous group was 47 ± 7°, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (43 ± 6°) (<em>P =</em> 0.02). The postoperative strength of the external rotator at 6 months in the Continuous group was 95 ± 33 N, significantly greater than in the Single group (78 ± 28 N) (<em>P</em> = 0.01). There was no significant difference in UCLA score at any time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The continuous interscalene block with ultrasound guidance in ARCR effectively relieved pain. The recovery of ROM for extension and the strength of the external rotator was better in the Continuous group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 6-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687324000049/pdfft?md5=8baa9211d10237229461c1aeefddff57&pid=1-s2.0-S2214687324000049-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687324000049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214687324000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景显微镜下肩袖修复术(ARCR)是一种微创手术技术。然而,控制术后疼痛是一项挑战。本研究旨在探讨单次肩胛间阻滞与联合连续阻滞在 ARCR 中的区别。在前期,43 名患者接受了单次椎间孔阻滞和术后持续静脉输注阿片类药物(单次组)。在后阶段,51 名患者术前接受单次椎间孔阻滞,术后接受连续阻滞(连续组)。他们手术时的平均年龄为 64.9 岁(43-83 岁)。平均随访时间为 25.4 个月(24-54 个月)。术后 1-4 天内,对术后即刻、休息时和夜间的疼痛进行了数字评分量表(NRS)评估。术后一天,对进食量进行评估,从0%(未进食)到100%(全部进食)不等。对加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)的肩关节评分、活动范围(ROM)和肩关节等长肌力进行了评估。这明显低于单一组(5.2 ± 1.8)(P = 0.002)。术后第二天,持续组休息时的 NRS 为 3.0 ± 2.1,明显低于单一组(3.9 ± 1.8)(P = 0.04)。连续组患者早上进食量为 61 % ± 37 %,明显高于单一组(35 % ± 41 %)(P = 0.004)。术后 6 个月时,持续组的伸展 ROM 为 47 ± 7°,明显高于单一组(43 ± 6°)(P = 0.02)。连续组术后 6 个月的外旋肌力量为 95 ± 33 N,明显高于单一组(78 ± 28 N)(P = 0.01)。结论 超声引导下的连续椎间孔阻滞在 ARCR 中能有效缓解疼痛。连续组的伸展 ROM 和外旋肌力量恢复更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a minimally invasive surgical technique. However, it is challenging to control postoperative pain. This study aimed to investigate the difference between a single-shot interscalene block and a combined continuous block for ARCR.

Methods

Ninety-four patients who underwent ARCR were included in this study. In the preceding period, 43 patients received a single-shot interscalene block and continuous postoperative intravenous opioid infusion (Single group). In the posterior period, 51 patients received a single-shot interscalene block preoperatively and a continuous block postoperatively (Continuous group). Their mean age at surgery was 64.9 years (range, 43–83 years). The mean follow-up period was 25.4 months (range, 24–54 months). The numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain was evaluated immediately after the surgery, at rest, and at night for 1–4 days after the surgery. One day postoperatively, the amount of food taken was assessed from 0 % (no food intake) to 100 % (all food taken). The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, range of motion (ROM), and isometric shoulder strength were evaluated.

Results

NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the day of surgery was 3.7 ± 2.5. This was significantly lower than in the Single group (5.2 ± 1.8) (P = 0.002). NRS at rest in the Continuous group on the second day after surgery was 3.0 ± 2.1, significantly lower than in the Single group (3.9 ± 1.8) (P = 0.04). The amount of food taken in the morning in the Continuous group was 61 % ± 37 %, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (35 % ± 41 %) (P = 0.004). The ROM of extension at 6 months postoperatively in the Continuous group was 47 ± 7°, which was significantly greater than in the Single group (43 ± 6°) (P = 0.02). The postoperative strength of the external rotator at 6 months in the Continuous group was 95 ± 33 N, significantly greater than in the Single group (78 ± 28 N) (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in UCLA score at any time.

Conclusion

The continuous interscalene block with ultrasound guidance in ARCR effectively relieved pain. The recovery of ROM for extension and the strength of the external rotator was better in the Continuous group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology (AP-SMART) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Asia-Pacific Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Society (APKASS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Society of Knee, Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine (JOSKAS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier. The mission of AP-SMART is to inspire clinicians, practitioners, scientists and engineers to work towards a common goal to improve quality of life in the international community. The Journal publishes original research, reviews, editorials, perspectives, and letters to the Editor. Multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines will be the trend in the coming decades. AP-SMART provides a platform for the exchange of new clinical and scientific information in the most precise and expeditious way to achieve timely dissemination of information and cross-fertilization of ideas.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting the therapeutic effects of multiple intra-articular injections of platelet-rich-plasma for knee osteoarthritis Early intervention of extracorporeal shockwave therapy sustained positive long-term effect on rotator cuff healing: A randomized controlled trial with 3-year follow-up The residual laxity of medial collateral ligament after magic point pie crusting MCL released in arthroscopic management of medial meniscus Fast rehabilitation does not worsen clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective comparative study ACL injury characteristics in badminton : A registry study with prospectively collected data on sports related epidemiology and injury mechanism of 539 badminton players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1