学术界青年研究人员的心理健康:从成长角度看问题

Dina Di Giacomo , Eleonora Cilli , Jessica Ranieri , Federica Guerra , Alessandra Martelli
{"title":"学术界青年研究人员的心理健康:从成长角度看问题","authors":"Dina Di Giacomo ,&nbsp;Eleonora Cilli ,&nbsp;Jessica Ranieri ,&nbsp;Federica Guerra ,&nbsp;Alessandra Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Young Researchers are a strategic sector in the research community because of the future academic scholars. Recently, growing evidence suggests mental health of young generation of researchers has a significant impact on their wellness, as well the related research output and their future career development. This study aimed to contribute and exploit a conceptual framework self-determination theory tailored to the academic context considering the specifics and challenges of academia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were 134 young Early Career Academics (mean age = 30.6; SD = 4.38; range = 25–40 years) enrolled via institutional e-mail. Psychological assessment was conducted applying standardized tests evaluating depression, anxiety, stress, emotional regulation difficulties and grit trait.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings highlighted a general trend toward negative psychological dimensions in young researchers: PhD students and Research contracts showed signs of depression, anxiety and stress. More, they highlighted reduced positive outcomes in psychological dimensions, as well as lower ability to manage emotional experiences and then to be perseverant for long-term goals and motivation. The balancing among examined psychological dimensions represents the perspective for mental health actions towards to personal growth related to successful academia experience.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Policy changes, communication activities and health-promotion activities through the circulation of experience, sharing actions, and strategies could be the pillar for fostering healthy academics by raising awareness, implementing interventions, or engaging professionals concerning mental health in academia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000024/pdfft?md5=97b5a88a54b6011ff5620324010478a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2468171724000024-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health of young researchers in academia: Towards to growth perspective\",\"authors\":\"Dina Di Giacomo ,&nbsp;Eleonora Cilli ,&nbsp;Jessica Ranieri ,&nbsp;Federica Guerra ,&nbsp;Alessandra Martelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Young Researchers are a strategic sector in the research community because of the future academic scholars. Recently, growing evidence suggests mental health of young generation of researchers has a significant impact on their wellness, as well the related research output and their future career development. This study aimed to contribute and exploit a conceptual framework self-determination theory tailored to the academic context considering the specifics and challenges of academia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants were 134 young Early Career Academics (mean age = 30.6; SD = 4.38; range = 25–40 years) enrolled via institutional e-mail. Psychological assessment was conducted applying standardized tests evaluating depression, anxiety, stress, emotional regulation difficulties and grit trait.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our findings highlighted a general trend toward negative psychological dimensions in young researchers: PhD students and Research contracts showed signs of depression, anxiety and stress. More, they highlighted reduced positive outcomes in psychological dimensions, as well as lower ability to manage emotional experiences and then to be perseverant for long-term goals and motivation. The balancing among examined psychological dimensions represents the perspective for mental health actions towards to personal growth related to successful academia experience.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Policy changes, communication activities and health-promotion activities through the circulation of experience, sharing actions, and strategies could be the pillar for fostering healthy academics by raising awareness, implementing interventions, or engaging professionals concerning mental health in academia.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000024/pdfft?md5=97b5a88a54b6011ff5620324010478a8&pid=1-s2.0-S2468171724000024-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171724000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标青年研究人员是研究界的一个战略部门,因为他们是未来的学术学者。最近,越来越多的证据表明,年轻一代研究人员的心理健康对他们的健康、相关研究成果和未来职业发展有着重要影响。考虑到学术界的特殊性和挑战,本研究旨在为学术界量身定制一个自我决定理论概念框架,并对其加以利用。心理评估采用标准化测试,评估抑郁、焦虑、压力、情绪调节困难和勇气特质:我们的研究结果表明,年轻研究人员的心理普遍趋于消极:博士生和研究合同人员表现出抑郁、焦虑和压力。此外,他们在心理维度上的积极结果也有所减少,管理情绪体验的能力也有所降低,对长期目标和动机的坚持也有所减弱。结论通过交流经验、分享行动和策略来改变政策、开展交流活动和健康促进活动,可以提高人们对学术界心理健康的认识、实施干预措施或让专业人员参与进来,从而成为促进学术界健康发展的支柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental health of young researchers in academia: Towards to growth perspective

Objective

Young Researchers are a strategic sector in the research community because of the future academic scholars. Recently, growing evidence suggests mental health of young generation of researchers has a significant impact on their wellness, as well the related research output and their future career development. This study aimed to contribute and exploit a conceptual framework self-determination theory tailored to the academic context considering the specifics and challenges of academia.

Methods

Participants were 134 young Early Career Academics (mean age = 30.6; SD = 4.38; range = 25–40 years) enrolled via institutional e-mail. Psychological assessment was conducted applying standardized tests evaluating depression, anxiety, stress, emotional regulation difficulties and grit trait.

Results

Our findings highlighted a general trend toward negative psychological dimensions in young researchers: PhD students and Research contracts showed signs of depression, anxiety and stress. More, they highlighted reduced positive outcomes in psychological dimensions, as well as lower ability to manage emotional experiences and then to be perseverant for long-term goals and motivation. The balancing among examined psychological dimensions represents the perspective for mental health actions towards to personal growth related to successful academia experience.

Conclusions

Policy changes, communication activities and health-promotion activities through the circulation of experience, sharing actions, and strategies could be the pillar for fostering healthy academics by raising awareness, implementing interventions, or engaging professionals concerning mental health in academia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive treatment for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review The role of meta-cognitive and emotional beliefs, and negative repetitive thinking in the relationship between emotional abuse and psychological distress in psychiatric outpatients: A serial multiple mediation model Low handgrip strength is a risk factor for symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors breast cancer patients BDNF blood levels as a potential biomarker Predictor of treatment response and remission in bipolar depression Erratum regarding missing ethical statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1