为药剂学、护理学和职业治疗学生开设的尿失禁跨专业主动学习实验室

Krista L. Donohoe, Benjamin Van Tassell, Allison Gregory, Dana Burns, Kerry Mader, Sera Lee, Raelyn Bitor, Emily P. Peron
{"title":"为药剂学、护理学和职业治疗学生开设的尿失禁跨专业主动学习实验室","authors":"Krista L. Donohoe,&nbsp;Benjamin Van Tassell,&nbsp;Allison Gregory,&nbsp;Dana Burns,&nbsp;Kerry Mader,&nbsp;Sera Lee,&nbsp;Raelyn Bitor,&nbsp;Emily P. Peron","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2024.100697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article describes a novel interprofessional approach to urinary incontinence<span> education. Faculty from the Doctor of Pharmacy, Master of Science in Nursing and Doctor of Nursing Practice<span>, and Doctor of Occupational Therapy programs collaborated to create an active-learning session for their students. Small interprofessional groups were assigned to one of three 2-h lab sessions, during which they rotated through five stations (durable medical equipment, catheters, medications, non-pharmacologic interventions, and absorbent products) then debriefed as a large group. A total of 210 students participated. Most survey respondents (89.2 %) rated the activity as “excellent” or “very good.” A majority endorsed that learning from interprofessional faculty and working with interprofessional students enhanced their learning experience (93.6 % and 90.8 %, respectively). Knowledge and confidence scores improved overall from before-to-after the session; however, profession- and station-specific variability was noted for several knowledge questions. Implementation challenges included scheduling logistics, differences in foundational knowledge by degree program, and fidelity of the learning experiences.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interprofessional active-learning laboratory on urinary incontinence for pharmacy, nursing, and occupational therapy students\",\"authors\":\"Krista L. Donohoe,&nbsp;Benjamin Van Tassell,&nbsp;Allison Gregory,&nbsp;Dana Burns,&nbsp;Kerry Mader,&nbsp;Sera Lee,&nbsp;Raelyn Bitor,&nbsp;Emily P. Peron\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjep.2024.100697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article describes a novel interprofessional approach to urinary incontinence<span> education. Faculty from the Doctor of Pharmacy, Master of Science in Nursing and Doctor of Nursing Practice<span>, and Doctor of Occupational Therapy programs collaborated to create an active-learning session for their students. Small interprofessional groups were assigned to one of three 2-h lab sessions, during which they rotated through five stations (durable medical equipment, catheters, medications, non-pharmacologic interventions, and absorbent products) then debriefed as a large group. A total of 210 students participated. Most survey respondents (89.2 %) rated the activity as “excellent” or “very good.” A majority endorsed that learning from interprofessional faculty and working with interprofessional students enhanced their learning experience (93.6 % and 90.8 %, respectively). Knowledge and confidence scores improved overall from before-to-after the session; however, profession- and station-specific variability was noted for several knowledge questions. Implementation challenges included scheduling logistics, differences in foundational knowledge by degree program, and fidelity of the learning experiences.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545262400003X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240545262400003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种新颖的跨专业尿失禁教育方法。来自药学博士、护理学硕士和护理实践博士以及作业疗法博士课程的教师们合作为学生们设计了一个主动学习课程。跨专业小组被分配到三个为期 2 小时的实验课中的一个,在此期间,他们轮流通过五个站点(耐用医疗设备、导尿管、药物、非药物干预和吸收产品),然后作为一个大组进行汇报。共有 210 名学生参加了此次活动。大多数调查对象(89.2%)将此次活动评为 "优秀 "或 "非常好"。大多数人认为,向跨专业教师学习以及与跨专业学生一起工作增强了他们的学习体验(分别为 93.6% 和 90.8%)。从课程前到课程后,知识和信心得分总体上有所提高;但是,在几个知识问题上,专业和工作站之间存在差异。实施过程中遇到的挑战包括后勤安排、不同学位课程在基础知识方面的差异以及学习体验的忠实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An interprofessional active-learning laboratory on urinary incontinence for pharmacy, nursing, and occupational therapy students

This article describes a novel interprofessional approach to urinary incontinence education. Faculty from the Doctor of Pharmacy, Master of Science in Nursing and Doctor of Nursing Practice, and Doctor of Occupational Therapy programs collaborated to create an active-learning session for their students. Small interprofessional groups were assigned to one of three 2-h lab sessions, during which they rotated through five stations (durable medical equipment, catheters, medications, non-pharmacologic interventions, and absorbent products) then debriefed as a large group. A total of 210 students participated. Most survey respondents (89.2 %) rated the activity as “excellent” or “very good.” A majority endorsed that learning from interprofessional faculty and working with interprofessional students enhanced their learning experience (93.6 % and 90.8 %, respectively). Knowledge and confidence scores improved overall from before-to-after the session; however, profession- and station-specific variability was noted for several knowledge questions. Implementation challenges included scheduling logistics, differences in foundational knowledge by degree program, and fidelity of the learning experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Watch a therapist get sued: A medicolegal interprofessional simulation on rehabilitation therapy documentation Interprofessional values and ethics curriculum for first year health professions students Increasing interprofessional education experiences and collaboration: Outcomes of a virtually-based continuing education program Getting everyone on the same page: Assessing interprofessional competencies during student placements Preparing health care learners using an interprofessional virtual simulation: A team-based community intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1