评估人工湿地作为厄瓜多尔安第斯山脉农村地区废水处理替代方案的马钱子属植物和泽兰的性能

IF 3.7 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100243
Carlos Matovelle , María Quinteros , Santiago Aurelio Ochoa-García
{"title":"评估人工湿地作为厄瓜多尔安第斯山脉农村地区废水处理替代方案的马钱子属植物和泽兰的性能","authors":"Carlos Matovelle ,&nbsp;María Quinteros ,&nbsp;Santiago Aurelio Ochoa-García","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Constructed wetlands have been used worldwide as an alternative for wastewater treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment using two different species of macrophyte in order to reduce pollution levels in the Curiquingue Creek belonging to the Baños parish in Cuenca, Ecuador. A pilot plant was constructed using <em>Equisetum spp</em> and <em>Zantedeschia aethiopica</em> with a constant flow of <span><math><mn>0.32</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup><msup><mi>d</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>. Each unit was filled with sand and gravel as the porosity medium with a hydraulic retention time of 5 days. To analyze the efficiency of the wetlands, physical and chemical parameters were analyzed in the laboratory. The results obtained in the laboratory showed that the two species of macrophyte showed good efficiency in the removal of organic matter (100% COD-100% BOD<sub>5</sub>). On the other hand, <em>Equisetum spp</em> showed better efficiency in the removal of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (80.28%) and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> (98.57%) meanwhile, <em>Zantedeschia aethiopica</em> showed better efficiency in the removal of TSS (85.71%). Constructed wetlands are an effective and sustainable option for wastewater treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000033/pdfft?md5=817a97dbb4eb9817a73443e2d8dcc348&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049024000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica on the evaluation of artificial wetlands as an alternative for wastewater treatment in rural areas of the Ecuadorian Andes\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Matovelle ,&nbsp;María Quinteros ,&nbsp;Santiago Aurelio Ochoa-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crsust.2024.100243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Constructed wetlands have been used worldwide as an alternative for wastewater treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment using two different species of macrophyte in order to reduce pollution levels in the Curiquingue Creek belonging to the Baños parish in Cuenca, Ecuador. A pilot plant was constructed using <em>Equisetum spp</em> and <em>Zantedeschia aethiopica</em> with a constant flow of <span><math><mn>0.32</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mi>m</mi><mn>3</mn></msup><msup><mi>d</mi><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msup></math></span>. Each unit was filled with sand and gravel as the porosity medium with a hydraulic retention time of 5 days. To analyze the efficiency of the wetlands, physical and chemical parameters were analyzed in the laboratory. The results obtained in the laboratory showed that the two species of macrophyte showed good efficiency in the removal of organic matter (100% COD-100% BOD<sub>5</sub>). On the other hand, <em>Equisetum spp</em> showed better efficiency in the removal of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> (80.28%) and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> (98.57%) meanwhile, <em>Zantedeschia aethiopica</em> showed better efficiency in the removal of TSS (85.71%). Constructed wetlands are an effective and sustainable option for wastewater treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000033/pdfft?md5=817a97dbb4eb9817a73443e2d8dcc348&pid=1-s2.0-S2666049024000033-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049024000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全世界都在使用人工湿地作为废水处理的替代方法。本研究的目的是评估使用两种不同种类的大型藻类处理废水的两处人工湿地,以降低厄瓜多尔昆卡巴尼奥斯教区库里金格小溪的污染水平。利用 Equisetum spp 和 Zantedeschia aethiopica 建造了一个试点工厂,恒定流量为 0.32 立方米/日。每个单元都填充了砂石作为孔隙介质,水力停留时间为 5 天。为了分析湿地的效率,在实验室对物理和化学参数进行了分析。实验室得出的结果表明,这两种大型藻类在去除有机物方面表现出良好的效率(100% COD-100% BOD5)。另一方面,Equisetum spp 在去除 NO3- (80.28%)和 PO43- (98.57%)方面表现出更高的效率,而 Zantedeschia aethiopica 在去除 TSS(85.71%)方面表现出更高的效率。建造湿地是一种有效且可持续的废水处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica on the evaluation of artificial wetlands as an alternative for wastewater treatment in rural areas of the Ecuadorian Andes

Constructed wetlands have been used worldwide as an alternative for wastewater treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment using two different species of macrophyte in order to reduce pollution levels in the Curiquingue Creek belonging to the Baños parish in Cuenca, Ecuador. A pilot plant was constructed using Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica with a constant flow of 0.32m3d1. Each unit was filled with sand and gravel as the porosity medium with a hydraulic retention time of 5 days. To analyze the efficiency of the wetlands, physical and chemical parameters were analyzed in the laboratory. The results obtained in the laboratory showed that the two species of macrophyte showed good efficiency in the removal of organic matter (100% COD-100% BOD5). On the other hand, Equisetum spp showed better efficiency in the removal of NO3 (80.28%) and PO43− (98.57%) meanwhile, Zantedeschia aethiopica showed better efficiency in the removal of TSS (85.71%). Constructed wetlands are an effective and sustainable option for wastewater treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
期刊最新文献
Achieving sustainability in family farming Green bonds and sustainable business models in Nordic energy companies Sustainability solutions: A new article type to address critical environmental challenges of the Anthropocene The European green deal, retail investors and sustainable investments: A perspective article covering economic, behavioral, and regulatory insights Performance of Equisetum spp and Zantedeschia aethiopica on the evaluation of artificial wetlands as an alternative for wastewater treatment in rural areas of the Ecuadorian Andes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1