人民的力量:衡量社交媒体和大众媒体对社会科学及应用科学领域晋升和终身职位的影响

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Policy Pub Date : 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w
Isha W. Metzger, Maryam Jernigan-Noesi, Shawn C. T. Jones, Erlanger A. Turner, Farzana Saleem, Jessica Jackson, Riana Elyse Anderson, Lisa A. Bartolomeo, Petty Tineo, Ijeoma Opara
{"title":"人民的力量:衡量社交媒体和大众媒体对社会科学及应用科学领域晋升和终身职位的影响","authors":"Isha W. Metzger, Maryam Jernigan-Noesi, Shawn C. T. Jones, Erlanger A. Turner, Farzana Saleem, Jessica Jackson, Riana Elyse Anderson, Lisa A. Bartolomeo, Petty Tineo, Ijeoma Opara","doi":"10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Promotion and tenure (P&amp;T) is the process by which academic faculty are evaluated on the trajectory and impact of their scholarly career. Faculty are typically assessed on their grants, publications, teaching, and service. Ethnically minoritized faculty face disparities in P&amp;T, perhaps due to the lack of standards for quantifying their efforts in the community and scholarship that is relevant to issues of social justice and public concern. Efforts in social and mass media to translate research findings and to disseminate evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts, however, are not often considered in P&amp;T despite their direct impact on the community and contribution to the field. This paper discusses how the academy can quantify and qualify the impact of social media and mass media work in existing P&amp;T considerations, particularly for departments with faculty in social and applied sciences. We discuss how social media and mass media work can be evaluated within existing P&amp;T review criteria, and we provide suggestions for committees to quantify the impact of online and media efforts. Last, we conclude with suggestions for departments, colleges, academic medical centers, and universities in higher education to support early career faculty who are engaging in this extremely important, often under-rewarded work.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power to the People: Measuring Social Media and Mass Media Impact for Promotion and Tenure in Social and Applied Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Isha W. Metzger, Maryam Jernigan-Noesi, Shawn C. T. Jones, Erlanger A. Turner, Farzana Saleem, Jessica Jackson, Riana Elyse Anderson, Lisa A. Bartolomeo, Petty Tineo, Ijeoma Opara\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Promotion and tenure (P&amp;T) is the process by which academic faculty are evaluated on the trajectory and impact of their scholarly career. Faculty are typically assessed on their grants, publications, teaching, and service. Ethnically minoritized faculty face disparities in P&amp;T, perhaps due to the lack of standards for quantifying their efforts in the community and scholarship that is relevant to issues of social justice and public concern. Efforts in social and mass media to translate research findings and to disseminate evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts, however, are not often considered in P&amp;T despite their direct impact on the community and contribution to the field. This paper discusses how the academy can quantify and qualify the impact of social media and mass media work in existing P&amp;T considerations, particularly for departments with faculty in social and applied sciences. We discuss how social media and mass media work can be evaluated within existing P&amp;T review criteria, and we provide suggestions for committees to quantify the impact of online and media efforts. Last, we conclude with suggestions for departments, colleges, academic medical centers, and universities in higher education to support early career faculty who are engaging in this extremely important, often under-rewarded work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00337-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

晋升和终身教职(P&T)是对学术教师学术生涯的轨迹和影响进行评估的过程。对教职员工的评估通常基于他们的基金、出版物、教学和服务。少数族裔教职员工在 P&T 方面面临着差异,这可能是由于缺乏量化他们在社区所做努力的标准,以及与社会正义和公众关切问题相关的学术成果。然而,社会和大众媒体为转化研究成果、传播循证预防和干预措施所做的努力,尽管对社区有直接影响,对该领域有贡献,却往往不被纳入 P&T 的考虑范围。本文讨论了学术界如何在现有的 P&T 考虑因素中量化和限定社交媒体和大众媒体工作的影响,特别是对于拥有社会科学和应用科学教师的院系。我们讨论了如何在现有的 P&T 评审标准中评估社交媒体和大众媒体工作,并为委员会量化网络和媒体工作的影响提供了建议。最后,我们为高等教育部门、学院、学术医学中心和大学提出了建议,以支持从事这项极其重要但往往回报不足的工作的早期职业教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power to the People: Measuring Social Media and Mass Media Impact for Promotion and Tenure in Social and Applied Sciences

Promotion and tenure (P&T) is the process by which academic faculty are evaluated on the trajectory and impact of their scholarly career. Faculty are typically assessed on their grants, publications, teaching, and service. Ethnically minoritized faculty face disparities in P&T, perhaps due to the lack of standards for quantifying their efforts in the community and scholarship that is relevant to issues of social justice and public concern. Efforts in social and mass media to translate research findings and to disseminate evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts, however, are not often considered in P&T despite their direct impact on the community and contribution to the field. This paper discusses how the academy can quantify and qualify the impact of social media and mass media work in existing P&T considerations, particularly for departments with faculty in social and applied sciences. We discuss how social media and mass media work can be evaluated within existing P&T review criteria, and we provide suggestions for committees to quantify the impact of online and media efforts. Last, we conclude with suggestions for departments, colleges, academic medical centers, and universities in higher education to support early career faculty who are engaging in this extremely important, often under-rewarded work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Policy
Higher Education Policy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy. The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome. Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.
期刊最新文献
The Third Space in Higher Education: A Scoping Review A Question of (Academic) Honour? Motivations for Member Participation in Advisory Boards in the German Science System Women’s Leadership Dilemma: Why Ethiopian Women in Academia Prefer to Stay away from Decision-Making? Beyond the Bench: The Professional Identity of Research Management and Administration The ‘Problem’ of University-Industry Linkages: Insights from Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1