糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理措施:范围审查。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2024-01-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7512
Rose J Geurten, Jeroen N Struijs, Henk J G Bilo, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M J Elissen
{"title":"糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理措施:范围审查。","authors":"Rose J Geurten, Jeroen N Struijs, Henk J G Bilo, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M J Elissen","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Population Health Management (PHM) focusses on keeping the whole population as healthy as possible. As such, it could be a promising approach for long-term health improvement in type 2 diabetes. This scoping review aimed to examine the extent to which and how PHM is used in the care for people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched between January 2000 and September 2021 for papers on self-reported PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes. Eligible initiatives were described using the analytical framework for PHM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25 studies regarding 18 PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes populations were included. There is considerable variation in whether and how the PHM steps are operationalized in existing PHM initiatives. Population identification, impact evaluation, and quality improvement processes were generally part of the PHM initiatives. Triple Aim assessment and risk stratification actions were scarce or explained in little detail. Moreover, cross-sector integration is key in PHM but scarce in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operationalization of PHM in practice is limited compared to the PHM steps described in the analytical framework. Extended risk stratification and integration efforts would contribute to whole-person care and further health improvements within the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling Population Health Management Initiatives in Diabetes Care: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rose J Geurten, Jeroen N Struijs, Henk J G Bilo, Dirk Ruwaard, Arianne M J Elissen\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.7512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Population Health Management (PHM) focusses on keeping the whole population as healthy as possible. As such, it could be a promising approach for long-term health improvement in type 2 diabetes. This scoping review aimed to examine the extent to which and how PHM is used in the care for people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched between January 2000 and September 2021 for papers on self-reported PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes. Eligible initiatives were described using the analytical framework for PHM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25 studies regarding 18 PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes populations were included. There is considerable variation in whether and how the PHM steps are operationalized in existing PHM initiatives. Population identification, impact evaluation, and quality improvement processes were generally part of the PHM initiatives. Triple Aim assessment and risk stratification actions were scarce or explained in little detail. Moreover, cross-sector integration is key in PHM but scarce in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Operationalization of PHM in practice is limited compared to the PHM steps described in the analytical framework. Extended risk stratification and integration efforts would contribute to whole-person care and further health improvements within the population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人群健康管理(PHM)的重点是尽可能保持整个人群的健康。因此,PHM 是改善 2 型糖尿病患者长期健康状况的有效方法。本范围综述旨在研究 PHM 在 2 型糖尿病患者护理中的应用程度和方式:方法:检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月期间在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 上发表的有关 2 型糖尿病患者自述 PHM 计划的论文。采用 PHM 分析框架对符合条件的措施进行了描述:结果:共纳入了 25 项研究,涉及 18 项针对 2 型糖尿病人群的 PHM 计划。在现有的 PHM 计划中,PHM 步骤是否可操作以及如何操作存在很大差异。人群识别、影响评估和质量改进过程通常是 PHM 计划的一部分。三重目标评估和风险分层行动很少,或解释得不详细。此外,跨部门整合是 PHM 的关键,但在实践中却很少见:与分析框架中描述的 PHM 步骤相比,PHM 在实践中的可操作性有限。扩大风险分层和整合工作将有助于全人护理和进一步改善人口的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disentangling Population Health Management Initiatives in Diabetes Care: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Population Health Management (PHM) focusses on keeping the whole population as healthy as possible. As such, it could be a promising approach for long-term health improvement in type 2 diabetes. This scoping review aimed to examine the extent to which and how PHM is used in the care for people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched between January 2000 and September 2021 for papers on self-reported PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes. Eligible initiatives were described using the analytical framework for PHM.

Results: In total, 25 studies regarding 18 PHM initiatives for type 2 diabetes populations were included. There is considerable variation in whether and how the PHM steps are operationalized in existing PHM initiatives. Population identification, impact evaluation, and quality improvement processes were generally part of the PHM initiatives. Triple Aim assessment and risk stratification actions were scarce or explained in little detail. Moreover, cross-sector integration is key in PHM but scarce in practice.

Conclusion: Operationalization of PHM in practice is limited compared to the PHM steps described in the analytical framework. Extended risk stratification and integration efforts would contribute to whole-person care and further health improvements within the population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
Is There an Ideal Payment Model That Enables Integrated Care: Searching for the Impossible? Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study. Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium. Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review. Cost of "Ideal Minimum Integrated Care" for Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension Patients in Cambodia Context: Provider Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1