中度与深度神经肌肉阻滞对腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后恢复特征的影响:随机双盲临床试验。

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_104_23
Narjes Alotaibi, Mahmoud Althaqafi, Abdullah Alharbi, Ahmed Thallaj, Abdulaziz Ahmad, Abdullah Aldohayan, Fahad Bamehriz, Abdelazeem Eldawlatly
{"title":"中度与深度神经肌肉阻滞对腹腔镜袖带胃切除术后恢复特征的影响:随机双盲临床试验。","authors":"Narjes Alotaibi, Mahmoud Althaqafi, Abdullah Alharbi, Ahmed Thallaj, Abdulaziz Ahmad, Abdullah Aldohayan, Fahad Bamehriz, Abdelazeem Eldawlatly","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_104_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia with deep neuromuscular block for laparoscopic surgery may result in less postoperative pain with lower intra-abdominal pressure. However, the results in the existing literature are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular block (NMB) on the postoperative recovery characteristics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for weight loss surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Patients undergoing LSG were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either deep (post-tetanic count 1-2) or moderate (train-of-four 1-2) NMB group. The primary outcomes were numeric rating scale scores of the postoperative pain at rest and postoperative shoulder pain. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative complications. The statistics were performed using StatsDirect statistical software (Version 2.7.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two groups were identified: Group D (deep NMB), 29 patients, and Group M (moderate NMB), 28 patients. The BMI mean values for groups D and M were 44 and 45 kg/m2 respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean durations of surgery for were 46.7 min and 44.1 min for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean train-of-four (TOF) counts were 0.3 and 0 for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean times from giving reversal agent to tracheal extubation (minutes) were 6.5 and 6.58 min for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In the recovery room, the means of pain scores were 3 and 4 for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Upon admission to the surgical ward, the median values of the pain score were non-significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The opioid consumption in the recovery room was non-significant between both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.3-0.6). Postoperative shoulder pain was non-significant between both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The median values of surgeon opinion of both groups were non-significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Regarding the LOS, the mean values of groups D and M were 1.20 and 1.21 days, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between moderate and deep NMB techniques in terms of duration of the surgical procedure, postoperative pain, shoulder pain, and length of hospital stay. Further studies on a larger sample size are required to investigate the long-term recovery characteristics of patients with obesity undergoing LSG.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10833021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of moderate versus deep neuromuscular blockade on the recovery characteristics following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized double blind clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Narjes Alotaibi, Mahmoud Althaqafi, Abdullah Alharbi, Ahmed Thallaj, Abdulaziz Ahmad, Abdullah Aldohayan, Fahad Bamehriz, Abdelazeem Eldawlatly\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_104_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia with deep neuromuscular block for laparoscopic surgery may result in less postoperative pain with lower intra-abdominal pressure. However, the results in the existing literature are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular block (NMB) on the postoperative recovery characteristics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for weight loss surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Patients undergoing LSG were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either deep (post-tetanic count 1-2) or moderate (train-of-four 1-2) NMB group. The primary outcomes were numeric rating scale scores of the postoperative pain at rest and postoperative shoulder pain. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative complications. The statistics were performed using StatsDirect statistical software (Version 2.7.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two groups were identified: Group D (deep NMB), 29 patients, and Group M (moderate NMB), 28 patients. The BMI mean values for groups D and M were 44 and 45 kg/m2 respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean durations of surgery for were 46.7 min and 44.1 min for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The mean train-of-four (TOF) counts were 0.3 and 0 for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The mean times from giving reversal agent to tracheal extubation (minutes) were 6.5 and 6.58 min for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). In the recovery room, the means of pain scores were 3 and 4 for groups M and D, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Upon admission to the surgical ward, the median values of the pain score were non-significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The opioid consumption in the recovery room was non-significant between both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.3-0.6). Postoperative shoulder pain was non-significant between both groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The median values of surgeon opinion of both groups were non-significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Regarding the LOS, the mean values of groups D and M were 1.20 and 1.21 days, respectively (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference between moderate and deep NMB techniques in terms of duration of the surgical procedure, postoperative pain, shoulder pain, and length of hospital stay. Further studies on a larger sample size are required to investigate the long-term recovery characteristics of patients with obesity undergoing LSG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10833021/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_104_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_104_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在腹腔镜手术中使用深部神经肌肉阻滞麻醉可减少术后疼痛,降低腹内压。然而,现有文献中的结果存在争议。本研究旨在评估深部神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)与中度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)对腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)减肥手术术后恢复特征的影响:这是一项平行分组、随机临床试验。研究在一家三级医疗中心进行。纳入了接受 LSG 手术的患者。患者被随机分配到深度(四肢抽搐后计数 1-2)或中度(四肢抽搐后计数 1-2)NMB 组。主要结果是术后休息时疼痛和术后肩部疼痛的数字评分量表得分。次要结果为住院时间(LOS)和术后并发症。统计采用 StatsDirect 统计软件(2.7.9 版):结果:分为两组:结果:分为两组:D 组(深度 NMB),29 名患者;M 组(中度 NMB),28 名患者。D 组和 M 组的 BMI 平均值分别为 44 和 45 kg/m2(P > 0.05)。M 组和 D 组的平均手术时间分别为 46.7 分钟和 44.1 分钟(P > 0.05)。M 组和 D 组的平均四列(TOF)计数分别为 0.3 和 0(P < 0.05)。从给予逆转剂到气管拔管的平均时间(分钟),M 组和 D 组分别为 6.5 分钟和 6.58 分钟(P > 0.05)。在恢复室,M 组和 D 组的平均疼痛评分分别为 3 分和 4 分(P > 0.05)。进入手术病房后,疼痛评分的中位值无显著差异(P > 0.05)(95% CI:0.4-0.7)。两组患者在恢复室的阿片类药物用量差异不大(P > 0.05)(95% CI:0.3-0.6)。两组患者术后肩部疼痛无显著差异(P > 0.05)(95% CI:0.4-0.7)。两组外科医生意见的中值差异无显著性(P > 0.05)。在住院时间方面,D组和M组的平均值分别为1.20天和1.21天(P > 0.05):结论:中度和深度 NMB 技术在手术时间、术后疼痛、肩部疼痛和住院时间方面没有明显差异。要研究接受LSG手术的肥胖症患者的长期恢复特点,还需要更多样本量的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of moderate versus deep neuromuscular blockade on the recovery characteristics following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized double blind clinical trial.

Background: Anesthesia with deep neuromuscular block for laparoscopic surgery may result in less postoperative pain with lower intra-abdominal pressure. However, the results in the existing literature are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of deep versus moderate neuromuscular block (NMB) on the postoperative recovery characteristics after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for weight loss surgery.

Methods: This is parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Patients undergoing LSG were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either deep (post-tetanic count 1-2) or moderate (train-of-four 1-2) NMB group. The primary outcomes were numeric rating scale scores of the postoperative pain at rest and postoperative shoulder pain. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS) and postoperative complications. The statistics were performed using StatsDirect statistical software (Version 2.7.9).

Results: Two groups were identified: Group D (deep NMB), 29 patients, and Group M (moderate NMB), 28 patients. The BMI mean values for groups D and M were 44 and 45 kg/m2 respectively (P > 0.05). The mean durations of surgery for were 46.7 min and 44.1 min for groups M and D, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean train-of-four (TOF) counts were 0.3 and 0 for groups M and D, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean times from giving reversal agent to tracheal extubation (minutes) were 6.5 and 6.58 min for groups M and D, respectively (P > 0.05). In the recovery room, the means of pain scores were 3 and 4 for groups M and D, respectively (P > 0.05). Upon admission to the surgical ward, the median values of the pain score were non-significant (P > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The opioid consumption in the recovery room was non-significant between both groups (P > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.3-0.6). Postoperative shoulder pain was non-significant between both groups (P > 0.05) (95% CI: 0.4-0.7). The median values of surgeon opinion of both groups were non-significant (P > 0.05). Regarding the LOS, the mean values of groups D and M were 1.20 and 1.21 days, respectively (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between moderate and deep NMB techniques in terms of duration of the surgical procedure, postoperative pain, shoulder pain, and length of hospital stay. Further studies on a larger sample size are required to investigate the long-term recovery characteristics of patients with obesity undergoing LSG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The trapezius plane block: Extended use in perioperative pain management in nerve transfer surgeries. Intermittent apnoea and manual jet ventilation: A successful anesthetic management for infant with acquired Myer-Cotton class III subglottic stenosis undergoing endoscopic balloon dilatation Challenges in the anesthetic management of a pediatric patient with glottic web – A lesson Effect of bispectral index on intra-operative awareness: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Incidence of post-dural lumbar puncture headache (PDLPH) in comparison between emergency and elective lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) with 26G Quincke–Babcock cutting-beveled spinal needle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1