拉丁美洲法医牙科学:对其当前研究及其研究的客观/主观性质的范围审查

María Fernanda Quevedo-Díaz, Laura Patricia González, Matías Arroyo-Navarrete, Karina Godoy, Gabriel M Fonseca
{"title":"拉丁美洲法医牙科学:对其当前研究及其研究的客观/主观性质的范围审查","authors":"María Fernanda Quevedo-Díaz, Laura Patricia González, Matías Arroyo-Navarrete, Karina Godoy, Gabriel M Fonseca","doi":"10.4067/s0717-95022024000100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"forensic odontology: A scoping review of its current research and the objective/subjective nature of its studies. Int. J. Morphol., 42(1) :185-196, 2023. SUMMARY: The new paradigm in Forensic Sciences initiated by the entry of genetics (the current standard of legal evidence) and accentuated by recognized wrongful convictions derived from experts today in the eye of criticism, has highlighted the potential for bias and error in forensic disciplines when they depend on human interpretation and subjectivity, which has not been avoided by Forensic Odontology (FO). However, a subjective judgment is not necessarily wrong, so the refinement of processes, the development of standards, and robust research can contribute to the validity of interpretation to increase objectivity. Latin America (LATAM) has its own realities and needs, which have conditioned the priorities and objectives of FO research. A scoping review is presented to systematically map the investigation of LATAM researchers and identify the objective or subjective nature of their assessments. LATAM shows interesting productivity and intentions to adhere to international standards, with Brazil leading this research significantly, followed by Chile and Colombia, among others. However, there is a disproportionate approach in certain lines of research (dental age estimation), and needs to address other quantitative studies, and to improve the visibility of the LATAM FO research.","PeriodicalId":507996,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Morphology","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latin American Forensic Odontology: A Scoping Review of its Current Research and the Objective/Subjective Nature of its Studies\",\"authors\":\"María Fernanda Quevedo-Díaz, Laura Patricia González, Matías Arroyo-Navarrete, Karina Godoy, Gabriel M Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0717-95022024000100185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"forensic odontology: A scoping review of its current research and the objective/subjective nature of its studies. Int. J. Morphol., 42(1) :185-196, 2023. SUMMARY: The new paradigm in Forensic Sciences initiated by the entry of genetics (the current standard of legal evidence) and accentuated by recognized wrongful convictions derived from experts today in the eye of criticism, has highlighted the potential for bias and error in forensic disciplines when they depend on human interpretation and subjectivity, which has not been avoided by Forensic Odontology (FO). However, a subjective judgment is not necessarily wrong, so the refinement of processes, the development of standards, and robust research can contribute to the validity of interpretation to increase objectivity. Latin America (LATAM) has its own realities and needs, which have conditioned the priorities and objectives of FO research. A scoping review is presented to systematically map the investigation of LATAM researchers and identify the objective or subjective nature of their assessments. LATAM shows interesting productivity and intentions to adhere to international standards, with Brazil leading this research significantly, followed by Chile and Colombia, among others. However, there is a disproportionate approach in certain lines of research (dental age estimation), and needs to address other quantitative studies, and to improve the visibility of the LATAM FO research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Morphology\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Morphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022024000100185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022024000100185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法医牙科学:对其当前研究及其研究的客观/主观性质的范围审查。Int. J. Morphol.J. Morphol., 42(1) :185-196, 2023.摘要:由遗传学(目前的法律证据标准)进入法医科学而启动的新范式,以及今天在批评声中由专家得出的公认错误定罪,突出了法医学科在依赖人类解释和主观性时出现偏见和错误的可能性,法医牙科学(FO)也未能避免这一点。然而,主观判断并不一定是错误的,因此,完善程序、制定标准和开展扎实的研究有助于提高解释的有效性,从而增强客观性。拉丁美洲(LATAM)有其自身的现实情况和需求,这决定了 FO 研究的优先事项和目标。本文介绍了一项范围审查,以系统地了解拉丁美洲和加勒比地区研究人员的调查情况,并确定其评估的客观或主观性质。拉丁美洲和加勒比地区显示出令人感兴趣的生产力和遵守国际标准的意愿,巴西在这方面的研究中遥遥领先,智利和哥伦比亚等国紧随其后。然而,在某些研究领域(牙龄估算)存在着不相称的方法,需要解决其他定量研究的问题,并提高拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区 FO 研究的知名度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Latin American Forensic Odontology: A Scoping Review of its Current Research and the Objective/Subjective Nature of its Studies
forensic odontology: A scoping review of its current research and the objective/subjective nature of its studies. Int. J. Morphol., 42(1) :185-196, 2023. SUMMARY: The new paradigm in Forensic Sciences initiated by the entry of genetics (the current standard of legal evidence) and accentuated by recognized wrongful convictions derived from experts today in the eye of criticism, has highlighted the potential for bias and error in forensic disciplines when they depend on human interpretation and subjectivity, which has not been avoided by Forensic Odontology (FO). However, a subjective judgment is not necessarily wrong, so the refinement of processes, the development of standards, and robust research can contribute to the validity of interpretation to increase objectivity. Latin America (LATAM) has its own realities and needs, which have conditioned the priorities and objectives of FO research. A scoping review is presented to systematically map the investigation of LATAM researchers and identify the objective or subjective nature of their assessments. LATAM shows interesting productivity and intentions to adhere to international standards, with Brazil leading this research significantly, followed by Chile and Colombia, among others. However, there is a disproportionate approach in certain lines of research (dental age estimation), and needs to address other quantitative studies, and to improve the visibility of the LATAM FO research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Patterns of the Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction and Implications of Stress-Related Behaviors: A Pilot Study Improvement of Na+-K+ ATPase Activity and Gene Expression Associated with Glomerular Ultrastructural Protection in Diabetic Nephropathy by Acacia senegal: Role of Oxidative Stress Disturbances Biological Identification of Skulls in Indonesian and Thai Populations: Ancestry Estimation, Sex Determination, Stature Estimation, and Age Estimation Changes in Height and Body Weight Within a Time Period of 35 Years in Males of the Same Age Microcomputed-Tomographic Analysis of the Root Canal Morphology of the Mandibular First Molars in a Malaysian Subpopulation Using Two Classification Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1