成人继发性嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症不同治疗方案的比较及预后因素分析:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.17219/acem/175355
Xing Wu, Changfeng Man, Wanying Cheng, Guangli Yin, Jiayu Huang, Jujuan Wang, Xin Gao, Tian Tian, Limin Duan, Ji Xu, Hongxia Qiu
{"title":"成人继发性嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症不同治疗方案的比较及预后因素分析:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Xing Wu, Changfeng Man, Wanying Cheng, Guangli Yin, Jiayu Huang, Jujuan Wang, Xin Gao, Tian Tian, Limin Duan, Ji Xu, Hongxia Qiu","doi":"10.17219/acem/175355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening disease caused by immune hyperactivation. The overall survival (OS) of adults with secondary HLH remains suboptimal and new treatment strategies are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different regimens in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults and analyze the prognostic factors affecting patient survival.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The clinical data of 245 adults with secondary HLH admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to different treatment regimens: corticosteroids therapy + chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (JHZ group), chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (HZ group) and corticosteroids therapy + supportive treatment group (JZ group). The clinical efficacy was compared among the 3 groups after treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Additionally, risk factors associated with prognosis were also analyzed with Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The objective response rate (ORR) in the JHZ group was higher than that in the HZ group and JZ group, but there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Also, the patients in the JHZ group had the longest OS and median PFS. Further Cox regression analysis suggested that hyperbilirubinemia was an independent risk factor for OS in secondary HLH patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of corticosteroids therapy, chemotherapy and supportive therapy is superior to the other 2 regimens in the clinical benefit in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults, and thus may be a preferred and feasible treatment regimen. Moreover, hyperbilirubinemia was a risk factor for prognosis that has crucial guiding significance for clinical treatment of patients with secondary HLH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1201-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different treatment regimens and analysis of prognostic factors in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xing Wu, Changfeng Man, Wanying Cheng, Guangli Yin, Jiayu Huang, Jujuan Wang, Xin Gao, Tian Tian, Limin Duan, Ji Xu, Hongxia Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/175355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening disease caused by immune hyperactivation. The overall survival (OS) of adults with secondary HLH remains suboptimal and new treatment strategies are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different regimens in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults and analyze the prognostic factors affecting patient survival.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The clinical data of 245 adults with secondary HLH admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to different treatment regimens: corticosteroids therapy + chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (JHZ group), chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (HZ group) and corticosteroids therapy + supportive treatment group (JZ group). The clinical efficacy was compared among the 3 groups after treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Additionally, risk factors associated with prognosis were also analyzed with Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The objective response rate (ORR) in the JHZ group was higher than that in the HZ group and JZ group, but there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Also, the patients in the JHZ group had the longest OS and median PFS. Further Cox regression analysis suggested that hyperbilirubinemia was an independent risk factor for OS in secondary HLH patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of corticosteroids therapy, chemotherapy and supportive therapy is superior to the other 2 regimens in the clinical benefit in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults, and thus may be a preferred and feasible treatment regimen. Moreover, hyperbilirubinemia was a risk factor for prognosis that has crucial guiding significance for clinical treatment of patients with secondary HLH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1201-1208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/175355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/175355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH嗜血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症(HLH)是一种因免疫功能亢进而导致的危及生命的疾病。继发性HLH成人患者的总生存率(OS)仍不理想,需要新的治疗策略:本研究旨在比较不同方案治疗成人继发性 HLH 的疗效,并分析影响患者生存的预后因素:回顾性分析我院2016年1月至2021年10月收治的245例成人继发性HLH患者的临床资料。根据不同的治疗方案将患者分为3组:皮质类固醇治疗+化疗+支持治疗组(JHZ组)、化疗+支持治疗组(HZ组)和皮质类固醇治疗+支持治疗组(JZ组)。比较三组治疗后的临床疗效,并计算无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。此外,还对与预后相关的危险因素进行了Cox回归分析:结果:JHZ组的客观反应率(ORR)高于HZ组和JZ组,但3组间无显著差异。此外,JHZ组患者的OS和中位PFS最长。进一步的Cox回归分析表明,高胆红素血症是继发性HLH患者OS的独立危险因素:结论:在治疗成人继发性 HLH 时,皮质类固醇疗法、化疗和支持疗法的联合应用在临床疗效上优于其他两种方案,因此可能是一种首选且可行的治疗方案。此外,高胆红素血症是影响预后的一个危险因素,对继发性 HLH 患者的临床治疗具有重要的指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of different treatment regimens and analysis of prognostic factors in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening disease caused by immune hyperactivation. The overall survival (OS) of adults with secondary HLH remains suboptimal and new treatment strategies are needed.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different regimens in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults and analyze the prognostic factors affecting patient survival.

Material and methods: The clinical data of 245 adults with secondary HLH admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to October 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to different treatment regimens: corticosteroids therapy + chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (JHZ group), chemotherapy + supportive treatment group (HZ group) and corticosteroids therapy + supportive treatment group (JZ group). The clinical efficacy was compared among the 3 groups after treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Additionally, risk factors associated with prognosis were also analyzed with Cox regression analysis.

Results: The objective response rate (ORR) in the JHZ group was higher than that in the HZ group and JZ group, but there was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Also, the patients in the JHZ group had the longest OS and median PFS. Further Cox regression analysis suggested that hyperbilirubinemia was an independent risk factor for OS in secondary HLH patients.

Conclusions: A combination of corticosteroids therapy, chemotherapy and supportive therapy is superior to the other 2 regimens in the clinical benefit in the treatment of secondary HLH in adults, and thus may be a preferred and feasible treatment regimen. Moreover, hyperbilirubinemia was a risk factor for prognosis that has crucial guiding significance for clinical treatment of patients with secondary HLH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
期刊最新文献
Experience with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in adult patients with Fontan circulation. Identification of IGFBP3 and LGALS1 as potential secreted biomarkers for clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis and machine learning. Peptide pool instability of precancerous lesions in rats with chronic pancreatitis model and/or without type 1 diabetes mellitus. Association between stress-induced hyperglycemia ratio and sepsis risk in patients admitted to ICU. Umbelliferone inhibits proliferation and metastasis via modulating cadherin/β-catenin complex-aided cell-cell adhesion in glioblastoma cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1