单孔机器人左外侧切片切除术对肝肿瘤患者的早期疗效。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.78
Young-Hyun Na, Wan-Bae Kim, Jae-Seung Kang, Sae Byeol Choi, Wan-Joon Kim
{"title":"单孔机器人左外侧切片切除术对肝肿瘤患者的早期疗效。","authors":"Young-Hyun Na, Wan-Bae Kim, Jae-Seung Kang, Sae Byeol Choi, Wan-Joon Kim","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) stands as a cornerstone procedure in hepatobiliary minimal surgery, frequently employed for various benign and malignant liver lesions. This study aimed to analyze the peri- and postoperative surgical outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy (SPR-LLS) <i>vs.</i> those of L-LLS in patients with hepatic tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2020 through June 2023, 12 patients underwent SPR-LLS. During the same period, 30 L-LLS procedures were performed. In total, 12 patients in the robotic group and 24 patients in the laparoscopic group were matched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the SPR-LLS and L-LLS groups were compared, the operation time was longer in the SPR-LLS group with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients in the L-LLS group (12.5%) and 1 patient in the SPR-LLS group (8.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPR-LLS using the da Vinci SP system was comparable to laparoscopic LLS in terms of surgical outcomes. SPR-LLS was associated with lower blood loss and less postoperative length of stay compared to L-LLS. These findings suggest that left lateral sectionectomy is technically feasible and safe with the da Vinci SP system in select patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy in patients with hepatic tumor.\",\"authors\":\"Young-Hyun Na, Wan-Bae Kim, Jae-Seung Kang, Sae Byeol Choi, Wan-Joon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) stands as a cornerstone procedure in hepatobiliary minimal surgery, frequently employed for various benign and malignant liver lesions. This study aimed to analyze the peri- and postoperative surgical outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy (SPR-LLS) <i>vs.</i> those of L-LLS in patients with hepatic tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2020 through June 2023, 12 patients underwent SPR-LLS. During the same period, 30 L-LLS procedures were performed. In total, 12 patients in the robotic group and 24 patients in the laparoscopic group were matched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the SPR-LLS and L-LLS groups were compared, the operation time was longer in the SPR-LLS group with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients in the L-LLS group (12.5%) and 1 patient in the SPR-LLS group (8.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPR-LLS using the da Vinci SP system was comparable to laparoscopic LLS in terms of surgical outcomes. SPR-LLS was associated with lower blood loss and less postoperative length of stay compared to L-LLS. These findings suggest that left lateral sectionectomy is technically feasible and safe with the da Vinci SP system in select patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838653/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.78\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.78","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜左外侧切片切除术(L-LLS)是肝胆微创手术的基础手术,常用于治疗各种良性和恶性肝脏病变。本研究旨在分析单孔机器人左外侧切片切除术(SPR-LLS)与腹腔镜左外侧切片切除术在肝肿瘤患者中的围手术期和术后手术效果:从2020年1月到2023年6月,12名患者接受了SPR-LLS手术。同期,进行了30例L-LLS手术。结果:SPR-LLS和L-LLS术后,机器人手术组和腹腔镜手术组分别有12名和24名患者接受了SPR-LLS和L-LLS术:SPR-LLS组和L-LLS组相比,SPR-LLS组的手术时间更长,失血量更少,住院时间更短。L-LLS组有3名患者(12.5%)出现术后并发症,SPR-LLS组有1名患者(8.3%):结论:就手术效果而言,使用达芬奇SP系统的SPR-LLS与腹腔镜LLS相当。与L-LLS相比,SPR-LLS的失血量更低,术后住院时间更短。这些研究结果表明,在特定患者中使用达芬奇SP系统进行左侧切口切除术在技术上是可行且安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy in patients with hepatic tumor.

Purpose: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) stands as a cornerstone procedure in hepatobiliary minimal surgery, frequently employed for various benign and malignant liver lesions. This study aimed to analyze the peri- and postoperative surgical outcomes of single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy (SPR-LLS) vs. those of L-LLS in patients with hepatic tumors.

Methods: From January 2020 through June 2023, 12 patients underwent SPR-LLS. During the same period, 30 L-LLS procedures were performed. In total, 12 patients in the robotic group and 24 patients in the laparoscopic group were matched.

Results: When the SPR-LLS and L-LLS groups were compared, the operation time was longer in the SPR-LLS group with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients in the L-LLS group (12.5%) and 1 patient in the SPR-LLS group (8.3%).

Conclusion: SPR-LLS using the da Vinci SP system was comparable to laparoscopic LLS in terms of surgical outcomes. SPR-LLS was associated with lower blood loss and less postoperative length of stay compared to L-LLS. These findings suggest that left lateral sectionectomy is technically feasible and safe with the da Vinci SP system in select patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of chlorhexidine gluconate double-cleansing for surgical site infection prevention in neonatal intensive care unit surgical patients. Mortality and associated factors among patients who underwent liver transplantation in South Korea from 2017 to 2021: a retrospective observational study. Outcomes in emergency surgery following the implementation of an acute care surgery model: a retrospective observational study. Primary tumor sidedness is not prognostic factor in resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a retrospective observational cohort study. The efficacy of exosomes from human chemically derived hepatic progenitors in liver damage alleviation: a preclinical experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1