患有神经纤维瘤病 1 型和丛状神经纤维瘤的儿童和青少年的书面语言成绩。

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1080/09297049.2024.2307663
Atara Siegel, Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula, Staci Martin, Andy Gillespie, Anne Goodwin, Brigitte Widemann, Pamela L Wolters
{"title":"患有神经纤维瘤病 1 型和丛状神经纤维瘤的儿童和青少年的书面语言成绩。","authors":"Atara Siegel, Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula, Staci Martin, Andy Gillespie, Anne Goodwin, Brigitte Widemann, Pamela L Wolters","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2307663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with below average writing achievement. However, little is known about specific aspects of written language impacted by NF1, changes in writing over time, and associations between cognitive aspects of the NF1 phenotype and writing. At three timepoints over six years, children with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) completed Woodcock-Johnson tests of writing mechanics (Spelling, Punctuation & Capitalization, handwriting), written expression of ideas (Writing Samples), writing speed (Writing Fluency), and tests of general cognitive ability, executive function, memory, and attention. Children (<i>N</i> = 76, mean age = 12.8 ± 3.4 years) completed at least one baseline writing subtest. Overall writing scores were in the Average range (<i>M</i> = 93.4, <i>SD</i> = 17.4), but lower than population norms (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Scores were highest on Writing Samples (<i>M</i> = 95.2, <i>SD</i> = 17.3), and lowest for Punctuation & Capitalization (<i>M</i> = 87.9, <i>SD</i> = 18.8, <i>p</i> = 0.034). Writing scores were mostly stable over time. Nonverbal reasoning was related to some tests of writing mechanics and written expression of ideas. Short-term memory and inattention explained additional variance in Writing Samples and Spelling. Poor handwriting was associated with writing content beyond the impact of cognitive factors. Children with NF1 and PNs may benefit from early screening and writing support. Interventions should address the contribution of both cognitive and handwriting difficulties in written language.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1095-1115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Written language achievement in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 and Plexiform Neurofibromas.\",\"authors\":\"Atara Siegel, Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula, Staci Martin, Andy Gillespie, Anne Goodwin, Brigitte Widemann, Pamela L Wolters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09297049.2024.2307663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with below average writing achievement. However, little is known about specific aspects of written language impacted by NF1, changes in writing over time, and associations between cognitive aspects of the NF1 phenotype and writing. At three timepoints over six years, children with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) completed Woodcock-Johnson tests of writing mechanics (Spelling, Punctuation & Capitalization, handwriting), written expression of ideas (Writing Samples), writing speed (Writing Fluency), and tests of general cognitive ability, executive function, memory, and attention. Children (<i>N</i> = 76, mean age = 12.8 ± 3.4 years) completed at least one baseline writing subtest. Overall writing scores were in the Average range (<i>M</i> = 93.4, <i>SD</i> = 17.4), but lower than population norms (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Scores were highest on Writing Samples (<i>M</i> = 95.2, <i>SD</i> = 17.3), and lowest for Punctuation & Capitalization (<i>M</i> = 87.9, <i>SD</i> = 18.8, <i>p</i> = 0.034). Writing scores were mostly stable over time. Nonverbal reasoning was related to some tests of writing mechanics and written expression of ideas. Short-term memory and inattention explained additional variance in Writing Samples and Spelling. Poor handwriting was associated with writing content beyond the impact of cognitive factors. Children with NF1 and PNs may benefit from early screening and writing support. Interventions should address the contribution of both cognitive and handwriting difficulties in written language.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1095-1115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2307663\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2307663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经纤维瘤病 1 型(NF1)与写作成绩低于平均水平有关。然而,人们对 NF1 影响书面语言的具体方面、书写随时间的变化以及 NF1 表型的认知方面与书写之间的关联知之甚少。在六年中的三个时间点,NF1 和丛状神经纤维瘤(PNs)患儿完成了伍德科克-约翰逊(Woodcock-Johnson)写作技巧测试(拼写、标点和大小写、手写)、书面思想表达测试(写作样本)、写作速度测试(写作流畅度)以及一般认知能力、执行功能、记忆力和注意力测试。儿童(人数 = 76,平均年龄 = 12.8 ± 3.4 岁)至少完成了一项基线写作测试。总体写作得分在平均范围内(中=93.4,标差=17.4),但低于人口常模(p=0.002)。写作范文得分最高(中=95.2,标点=17.3),标点和大小写得分最低(中=87.9,标点=18.8,p=0.034)。写作分数随着时间的推移基本保持稳定。非语言推理与某些写作技巧和书面表达想法的测试有关。短期记忆和注意力不集中解释了写作样本和拼写方面的其他差异。除认知因素的影响外,书写不规范还与写作内容有关。患有 NF1 和 PNs 的儿童可能会受益于早期筛查和书写支持。干预措施应同时解决认知障碍和书写障碍对书面语言的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Written language achievement in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1 and Plexiform Neurofibromas.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with below average writing achievement. However, little is known about specific aspects of written language impacted by NF1, changes in writing over time, and associations between cognitive aspects of the NF1 phenotype and writing. At three timepoints over six years, children with NF1 and plexiform neurofibromas (PNs) completed Woodcock-Johnson tests of writing mechanics (Spelling, Punctuation & Capitalization, handwriting), written expression of ideas (Writing Samples), writing speed (Writing Fluency), and tests of general cognitive ability, executive function, memory, and attention. Children (N = 76, mean age = 12.8 ± 3.4 years) completed at least one baseline writing subtest. Overall writing scores were in the Average range (M = 93.4, SD = 17.4), but lower than population norms (p = 0.002). Scores were highest on Writing Samples (M = 95.2, SD = 17.3), and lowest for Punctuation & Capitalization (M = 87.9, SD = 18.8, p = 0.034). Writing scores were mostly stable over time. Nonverbal reasoning was related to some tests of writing mechanics and written expression of ideas. Short-term memory and inattention explained additional variance in Writing Samples and Spelling. Poor handwriting was associated with writing content beyond the impact of cognitive factors. Children with NF1 and PNs may benefit from early screening and writing support. Interventions should address the contribution of both cognitive and handwriting difficulties in written language.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
期刊最新文献
Prenatal chronic inflammation and children's executive function development. Cognitive performance, psychiatric comorbidities, and quality of life in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative analysis with healthy controls. Development of inattention and executive dysfunction in youth with spina bifida: condition severity variables as predictors. Evidence of validity of the Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders Revised (HTKS-R) for Brazilian children. Early life parechovirus infection neuropsychological outcomes at 8 years: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1