放射辛格指数与双能量 X 射线吸收扫描在诊断骨质疏松症方面的诊断价值比较:系统回顾

Elham Ghalenavi, Zahra Mirfeizi, Kamila Hashemzadeh, Maryam Sahebari, Mohammad Hassan Joker
{"title":"放射辛格指数与双能量 X 射线吸收扫描在诊断骨质疏松症方面的诊断价值比较:系统回顾","authors":"Elham Ghalenavi, Zahra Mirfeizi, Kamila Hashemzadeh, Maryam Sahebari, Mohammad Hassan Joker","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2023.70632.3309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since various medications can control the rate of fractures and subsequent complications of osteoporosis, the early detection of the disease is crucial. This systematic study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Singh index (SI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a benchmark standard for diagnosing osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were utilized in the current study. A detailed search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 May 2022. Examining quality of the studies was performed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies were included. In general, 50% of the studies considered SI a poor screening tool for detecting osteoporosis due to a negligible inter-observer agreement between SI and DEXA or a poor correlation of SI with the bone mineral density (BMD) category or DEXA T-score. A moderate inter-observer agreement was reported for SI in 5 (55.6%) studies. Among the studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of SI compared to DEXA (n=13), six studies estimated a low sensitivity for SI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is supporting evidence indicating the potential usefulness of SI for predicting femoral neck fractures in individuals with suspected osteoporosis, numerous studies challenge its reliability and diagnostic value as a screening tool for identifying femoral neck osteoporosis. Further primary studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the SI index in identifying populations at risk of osteoporosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Elham Ghalenavi, Zahra Mirfeizi, Kamila Hashemzadeh, Maryam Sahebari, Mohammad Hassan Joker\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2023.70632.3309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since various medications can control the rate of fractures and subsequent complications of osteoporosis, the early detection of the disease is crucial. This systematic study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Singh index (SI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a benchmark standard for diagnosing osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were utilized in the current study. A detailed search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 May 2022. Examining quality of the studies was performed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies were included. In general, 50% of the studies considered SI a poor screening tool for detecting osteoporosis due to a negligible inter-observer agreement between SI and DEXA or a poor correlation of SI with the bone mineral density (BMD) category or DEXA T-score. A moderate inter-observer agreement was reported for SI in 5 (55.6%) studies. Among the studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of SI compared to DEXA (n=13), six studies estimated a low sensitivity for SI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While there is supporting evidence indicating the potential usefulness of SI for predicting femoral neck fractures in individuals with suspected osteoporosis, numerous studies challenge its reliability and diagnostic value as a screening tool for identifying femoral neck osteoporosis. Further primary studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the SI index in identifying populations at risk of osteoporosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838578/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.70632.3309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2023.70632.3309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于各种药物可控制骨质疏松症的骨折率和后续并发症,因此早期发现该疾病至关重要。本系统性研究旨在比较辛格指数(SI)与双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DEXA)作为诊断骨质疏松症基准标准的诊断准确性:本研究采用了系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)。从开始到 2022 年 5 月 30 日,使用 PubMed 和 Scopus 进行了详细检索。研究质量由诊断准确性研究质量评估-2(QUADAS-2)进行检验:结果:共纳入 22 项研究。总体而言,50%的研究认为SI是检测骨质疏松症的不良筛查工具,原因是SI与DEXA之间的观察者间一致性微乎其微,或SI与骨矿物质密度(BMD)类别或DEXA T-score的相关性较差。有 5 项(55.6%)研究报告称 SI 的观察者间一致性为中等。在评估 SI 与 DEXA 相比的灵敏度和特异性的研究(13 项)中,有 6 项研究估计 SI 的灵敏度较低:尽管有支持性证据表明,SI 对预测疑似骨质疏松症患者的股骨颈骨折有潜在作用,但许多研究对其作为股骨颈骨质疏松症筛查工具的可靠性和诊断价值提出了质疑。要验证 SI 指数在识别骨质疏松症高危人群方面的有效性,还需要进一步的初步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Objectives: Since various medications can control the rate of fractures and subsequent complications of osteoporosis, the early detection of the disease is crucial. This systematic study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Singh index (SI) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a benchmark standard for diagnosing osteoporosis.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) were utilized in the current study. A detailed search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus from inception to 30 May 2022. Examining quality of the studies was performed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).

Results: A total of 22 studies were included. In general, 50% of the studies considered SI a poor screening tool for detecting osteoporosis due to a negligible inter-observer agreement between SI and DEXA or a poor correlation of SI with the bone mineral density (BMD) category or DEXA T-score. A moderate inter-observer agreement was reported for SI in 5 (55.6%) studies. Among the studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of SI compared to DEXA (n=13), six studies estimated a low sensitivity for SI.

Conclusion: While there is supporting evidence indicating the potential usefulness of SI for predicting femoral neck fractures in individuals with suspected osteoporosis, numerous studies challenge its reliability and diagnostic value as a screening tool for identifying femoral neck osteoporosis. Further primary studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the SI index in identifying populations at risk of osteoporosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
期刊最新文献
A Large Ankle Mass in a Figure Skater: A Case Report. Diagnostic Value of Radiographic Singh Index Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Diagnosing Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review. Double and Single Bundle in Athletes: A Comparison in Medium and Long-Term Rates to Return to Sport and Re-Injury. Investigating the Effect of Addition of Cervical Proprioceptive Training to Conventional Physiotherapy on Visual, Vestibular and Proprioceptive Dependency of Postural Control in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Is Arthroscopic Latarjet a Cost-Effective Procedure? A Decision Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1