解释无法解释的原因:研究精液参数、精子 DNA 片段和金属水平对不明原因不孕症的预测价值。

Q2 Medicine Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_140_23
Navdeep Kaur Ghuman, Kamla Kant Shukla, Srividhya Nandagopal, Sunil Raikar, Shailendra Kumar, Priyanka Kathuria, Dinesh Choudhary, Poonam Elhence, Pratibha Singh
{"title":"解释无法解释的原因:研究精液参数、精子 DNA 片段和金属水平对不明原因不孕症的预测价值。","authors":"Navdeep Kaur Ghuman, Kamla Kant Shukla, Srividhya Nandagopal, Sunil Raikar, Shailendra Kumar, Priyanka Kathuria, Dinesh Choudhary, Poonam Elhence, Pratibha Singh","doi":"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_140_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing research to find an optimum modality to predict male fertility potential.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the semen parameters, sperm DNA damage and seminal metal levels of Zinc, Lead and Aluminium among the male partners of couples with unexplained infertility and men with proven fertility.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Prospective case-control study at a tertiary level teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred male partners of couples with unexplained subfertility and 50 men with proven fertility were included in the study. Male partners of unexplained infertility couples and fertile men were compared for their semen parameters, sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) and seminal metal levels in semen.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Chi-square test, Student's <i>t</i>-test, sensitivity and specificity analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fertile men had statistically significantly higher mean progressive sperm motility than male partners of unexplained infertility (53.12 ± 9.89% vs. 44.81 ± 19.47%, <i>P</i> = 0.005). Semen volume and sperm concentration were comparable among the cases and control population. The mean sperm DFI was significantly lower among fertile men (10.83 ± 6.28 vs. 21.38 ± 10.28, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Plotting the receiver-operating characteristic curve the threshold for discrimination was calculated to be 18% DFI. The sensitivity specificity and overall accuracy were 43%, 84% and 56.67%, respectively when the DFI cut-off was set at 18%. Zinc concentration in the semen had a strong positive correlation (Point Biserial correlation coefficient = 0.831) with fertility, whereas lead and aluminium had a moderate negative correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional semen analysis had limited differentiating ability for unexplained infertility. The sperm DFI may be employed for explanatory purposes among couples with unexplained subfertility. A lower discriminatory threshold of DFI (18%) has better overall accuracy as opposed to a 30% cutpoint for unexplained subfertility. Among metals, Zinc was strongly correlated with fertility status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","volume":"16 4","pages":"317-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining the Unexplained: Examining the Predictive Value of Semen Parameters, Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Metal Levels in Unexplained Infertility.\",\"authors\":\"Navdeep Kaur Ghuman, Kamla Kant Shukla, Srividhya Nandagopal, Sunil Raikar, Shailendra Kumar, Priyanka Kathuria, Dinesh Choudhary, Poonam Elhence, Pratibha Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_140_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing research to find an optimum modality to predict male fertility potential.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the semen parameters, sperm DNA damage and seminal metal levels of Zinc, Lead and Aluminium among the male partners of couples with unexplained infertility and men with proven fertility.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Prospective case-control study at a tertiary level teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred male partners of couples with unexplained subfertility and 50 men with proven fertility were included in the study. Male partners of unexplained infertility couples and fertile men were compared for their semen parameters, sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) and seminal metal levels in semen.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Chi-square test, Student's <i>t</i>-test, sensitivity and specificity analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fertile men had statistically significantly higher mean progressive sperm motility than male partners of unexplained infertility (53.12 ± 9.89% vs. 44.81 ± 19.47%, <i>P</i> = 0.005). Semen volume and sperm concentration were comparable among the cases and control population. The mean sperm DFI was significantly lower among fertile men (10.83 ± 6.28 vs. 21.38 ± 10.28, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Plotting the receiver-operating characteristic curve the threshold for discrimination was calculated to be 18% DFI. The sensitivity specificity and overall accuracy were 43%, 84% and 56.67%, respectively when the DFI cut-off was set at 18%. Zinc concentration in the semen had a strong positive correlation (Point Biserial correlation coefficient = 0.831) with fertility, whereas lead and aluminium had a moderate negative correlation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional semen analysis had limited differentiating ability for unexplained infertility. The sperm DFI may be employed for explanatory purposes among couples with unexplained subfertility. A lower discriminatory threshold of DFI (18%) has better overall accuracy as opposed to a 30% cutpoint for unexplained subfertility. Among metals, Zinc was strongly correlated with fertility status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"317-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_140_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_140_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:比较不明原因不育夫妇的男性伴侣和已证明有生育能力的男性伴侣的精液参数、精子DNA损伤以及精液中锌、铅和铝的金属含量:在一家三级教学医院进行的前瞻性病例对照研究:研究对象包括 100 名不明原因不育夫妇的男性伴侣和 50 名经证实具有生育能力的男性。比较不明原因不育夫妇的男性伴侣和有生育能力男性的精液参数、精子 DNA 碎片指数(DFI)和精液中的精液金属含量:采用的统计分析方法有:卡方检验、学生 t 检验、敏感性和特异性分析、二项式逻辑回归分析:从统计学角度看,生育男性的平均精子活力明显高于不明原因不育的男性伴侣(53.12 ± 9.89% vs. 44.81 ± 19.47%,P = 0.005)。病例和对照人群的精液量和精子浓度相当。可育男性的平均精子DFI明显较低(10.83 ± 6.28 vs. 21.38 ± 10.28,P < 0.0001)。通过绘制接收器工作特征曲线,计算出辨别阈值为 18% DFI。当 DFI 临界值设定为 18% 时,灵敏度、特异度和总体准确度分别为 43%、84% 和 56.67%。精液中锌的浓度与生育能力有很强的正相关性(Point Biserial correlation coefficient = 0.831),而铅和铝则呈中度负相关:结论:传统精液分析对不明原因不育症的区分能力有限。精子DFI可用于解释不明原因的不育夫妇。与 30% 的不明原因不育症切点相比,较低的 DFI 临界值(18%)具有更好的整体准确性。在金属元素中,锌与生育状况密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining the Unexplained: Examining the Predictive Value of Semen Parameters, Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Metal Levels in Unexplained Infertility.

Background: There is ongoing research to find an optimum modality to predict male fertility potential.

Aims: To compare the semen parameters, sperm DNA damage and seminal metal levels of Zinc, Lead and Aluminium among the male partners of couples with unexplained infertility and men with proven fertility.

Settings and design: Prospective case-control study at a tertiary level teaching hospital.

Materials and methods: One hundred male partners of couples with unexplained subfertility and 50 men with proven fertility were included in the study. Male partners of unexplained infertility couples and fertile men were compared for their semen parameters, sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) and seminal metal levels in semen.

Statistical analysis used: Chi-square test, Student's t-test, sensitivity and specificity analysis, binomial logistic regression analysis.

Results: Fertile men had statistically significantly higher mean progressive sperm motility than male partners of unexplained infertility (53.12 ± 9.89% vs. 44.81 ± 19.47%, P = 0.005). Semen volume and sperm concentration were comparable among the cases and control population. The mean sperm DFI was significantly lower among fertile men (10.83 ± 6.28 vs. 21.38 ± 10.28, P < 0.0001). Plotting the receiver-operating characteristic curve the threshold for discrimination was calculated to be 18% DFI. The sensitivity specificity and overall accuracy were 43%, 84% and 56.67%, respectively when the DFI cut-off was set at 18%. Zinc concentration in the semen had a strong positive correlation (Point Biserial correlation coefficient = 0.831) with fertility, whereas lead and aluminium had a moderate negative correlation.

Conclusion: Conventional semen analysis had limited differentiating ability for unexplained infertility. The sperm DFI may be employed for explanatory purposes among couples with unexplained subfertility. A lower discriminatory threshold of DFI (18%) has better overall accuracy as opposed to a 30% cutpoint for unexplained subfertility. Among metals, Zinc was strongly correlated with fertility status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences
Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences (JHRS) (ISSN:0974-1208) a Quarterly peer-reviewed international journal is being launched in January 2008 under the auspices of Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction. The journal will cover all aspects human reproduction including Andrology, Assisted conception, Endocrinology, Physiology and Pathology, Implantation, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Embryology as well as Ethical, Legal and Social issues. The journal will publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
期刊最新文献
An Integrative Approach to Precision Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis by Investigating Single-cell Sequencing, Polygenic Risk Assessment, Artificial Intelligence-guided Embryo Selection and Genome Editing in Embryos with COL4A1 c.1537G>A Mutation. Evaluation of Predictors of Response to Ovulation Induction Using Letrozole in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study. First-trimester Doppler Ultrasound for Predicting Successful Management of Pregnancy with Recurrent Pregnancy Losses Due to Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Thrombophilia: A Cohort Study. Assessment of Thyroid Auto-antibodies in Euthyroid Infertile Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome - A Cross-sectional Analytical Study. Detection of Lactoferrin and Iron in Seminal Plasma and Their Possible Relation to Semen Parameters and Infertility in Varicocele: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1