评估原发性后天性鼻泪管阻塞:CT-DCG 与泪道内窥镜在准确定位泪道引流阻塞方面的比较。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY European Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1177/11206721241230581
Wenyue Zhang, Lunhao Li, Leilei Zhang, Yi Ding, Xueru Liu, Mohammad Javed Ali, Caiwen Xiao
{"title":"评估原发性后天性鼻泪管阻塞:CT-DCG 与泪道内窥镜在准确定位泪道引流阻塞方面的比较。","authors":"Wenyue Zhang, Lunhao Li, Leilei Zhang, Yi Ding, Xueru Liu, Mohammad Javed Ali, Caiwen Xiao","doi":"10.1177/11206721241230581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To correlate and evaluate the power and limitations of CT-DCG in determining the level and type of lacrimal duct obstruction in comparison to dacryoendoscopy in patients clinically suspected to be having partial or complete primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on 1232 lacrimal drainage systems of 957 patients who suffered from primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. Patients were examined with CT-DCG and correlated with dacryoendoscopy and the findings of clinical examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the studied patients, 173 were men and 784 were women with an age range of 18-93 years. Of the 1232 lacrimal pathways, good CT-DCG images could be obtained in 980 cases and dacryoendoscopy in 957 cases. Of these complete obstructions were noted in 81% (794/980), and partial obstructions were identified in 19% (186/980) with CT-DCG. CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy showed 68.4% agreement for the type of the obstruction and 63% for the level of the obstruction. The majority of the obstructions occurred at the sac-duct junction (62.5%) followed by the upper half of the nasolacrimal duct (27.5%). There was a significant difference in the correlation of the obstruction type with age group and with the duration of symptoms. As the duration of symptoms increased, the proportion of complete lacrimal duct obstructions as shown on CT-DCG images increased and the proportion of incomplete obstruction decreased (<i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The junction of lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct was the most common obstruction site. Age and the duration of symptoms influenced the type of obstruction noted. The degree and level of agreement between the investigations was moderate. A combination of CT-DCG and Dacryoendoscopy could together identify the location more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Comparison of CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy in accurately localizing the lacrimal drainage obstructions.\",\"authors\":\"Wenyue Zhang, Lunhao Li, Leilei Zhang, Yi Ding, Xueru Liu, Mohammad Javed Ali, Caiwen Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721241230581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To correlate and evaluate the power and limitations of CT-DCG in determining the level and type of lacrimal duct obstruction in comparison to dacryoendoscopy in patients clinically suspected to be having partial or complete primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on 1232 lacrimal drainage systems of 957 patients who suffered from primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. Patients were examined with CT-DCG and correlated with dacryoendoscopy and the findings of clinical examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the studied patients, 173 were men and 784 were women with an age range of 18-93 years. Of the 1232 lacrimal pathways, good CT-DCG images could be obtained in 980 cases and dacryoendoscopy in 957 cases. Of these complete obstructions were noted in 81% (794/980), and partial obstructions were identified in 19% (186/980) with CT-DCG. CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy showed 68.4% agreement for the type of the obstruction and 63% for the level of the obstruction. The majority of the obstructions occurred at the sac-duct junction (62.5%) followed by the upper half of the nasolacrimal duct (27.5%). There was a significant difference in the correlation of the obstruction type with age group and with the duration of symptoms. As the duration of symptoms increased, the proportion of complete lacrimal duct obstructions as shown on CT-DCG images increased and the proportion of incomplete obstruction decreased (<i>p</i> = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The junction of lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct was the most common obstruction site. Age and the duration of symptoms influenced the type of obstruction noted. The degree and level of agreement between the investigations was moderate. A combination of CT-DCG and Dacryoendoscopy could together identify the location more accurately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241230581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241230581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的方法:对临床上怀疑部分或完全性原发性获得性鼻泪管阻塞(PANDO)的患者进行CT-DCG与泪道镜检查的比较,以评估CT-DCG在确定泪道阻塞程度和类型方面的作用和局限性:上海第九人民医院对957名原发性后天性鼻泪管阻塞(PANDO)患者的1232个泪道引流系统进行了回顾性病历审查。患者接受了 CT-DCG 检查,并与泪道内窥镜检查和临床检查结果进行了对比:在研究的患者中,男性 173 人,女性 784 人,年龄在 18-93 岁之间。在 1232 条泪道中,980 例可获得良好的 CT-DCG 图像,957 例可获得泪道镜检查结果。其中 81%(794/980)的泪道完全阻塞,19%(186/980)的泪道部分阻塞。CT-DCG 和泪道内窥镜检查在阻塞类型上的一致率为 68.4%,在阻塞程度上的一致率为 63%。大多数阻塞发生在囊-导管交界处(62.5%),其次是鼻泪管上半部(27.5%)。阻塞类型与年龄组和症状持续时间的相关性存在明显差异。随着症状持续时间的延长,CT-DCG 图像显示完全性泪道阻塞的比例增加,不完全性阻塞的比例下降(P = 0.015):结论:泪囊与鼻泪管交界处是最常见的阻塞部位。结论:泪囊与鼻泪管交界处是最常见的阻塞部位,年龄和症状持续时间对阻塞类型有影响。各项检查之间的一致程度和水平适中。结合 CT-DCG 和泪道内窥镜检查可以更准确地确定阻塞部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Comparison of CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy in accurately localizing the lacrimal drainage obstructions.

Objective: To correlate and evaluate the power and limitations of CT-DCG in determining the level and type of lacrimal duct obstruction in comparison to dacryoendoscopy in patients clinically suspected to be having partial or complete primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO).

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 1232 lacrimal drainage systems of 957 patients who suffered from primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. Patients were examined with CT-DCG and correlated with dacryoendoscopy and the findings of clinical examination.

Results: Of the studied patients, 173 were men and 784 were women with an age range of 18-93 years. Of the 1232 lacrimal pathways, good CT-DCG images could be obtained in 980 cases and dacryoendoscopy in 957 cases. Of these complete obstructions were noted in 81% (794/980), and partial obstructions were identified in 19% (186/980) with CT-DCG. CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy showed 68.4% agreement for the type of the obstruction and 63% for the level of the obstruction. The majority of the obstructions occurred at the sac-duct junction (62.5%) followed by the upper half of the nasolacrimal duct (27.5%). There was a significant difference in the correlation of the obstruction type with age group and with the duration of symptoms. As the duration of symptoms increased, the proportion of complete lacrimal duct obstructions as shown on CT-DCG images increased and the proportion of incomplete obstruction decreased (p = 0.015).

Conclusions: The junction of lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct was the most common obstruction site. Age and the duration of symptoms influenced the type of obstruction noted. The degree and level of agreement between the investigations was moderate. A combination of CT-DCG and Dacryoendoscopy could together identify the location more accurately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
372
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.
期刊最新文献
Acute infectious endophthalmitis after chandelier-assisted scleral buckling surgery. Bagel sign and how to avoid it in DMEK surgery. Changes in choroidal thickness and lamina cribrosa position in subjects with overdipper pattern of arterial pressure. Characteristics of submacular hemorrhage with bacillary layer detachment and intrabacillary hemorrhage. Comparison of 3-month clinical outcomes between two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses: A single-center prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1