Maria Tirta, Mette Holm Hjorth, Jette Frost Jepsen, Ole Rahbek, Søren Kold
{"title":"经皮腓骨外固定术和 Phemister 技术对治疗腿长不一致有效吗?系统综述。","authors":"Maria Tirta, Mette Holm Hjorth, Jette Frost Jepsen, Ole Rahbek, Søren Kold","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epiphysiodesis is considered the preferred treatment for children predicted to have leg length discrepancies (LLDs) 2-5 cm at maturity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on the effectiveness of permanent epiphysiodesis for LLD treatment, and secondarily to address the reported complications of permanent epiphysiodesis techniques. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with permanent epiphysiodesis. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre/post-operatively, successful/unsuccessful), physeal fusion/arrest, and complications that were graded on severity. Forty-nine studies (3051 patients) were included, 1550 underwent Phemister/modified Phemister epiphysiodesis and 1501 percutaneous epiphysiodesis (PE). Total successful permanent epiphysiodesis surgeries (16 studies) were 73.7% (516/700). Only 13 out of 23 studies had a mean final LLD of less than 1.5 cm. In total, 17.5% (513/2936) of complications were reported. 57 angular deformities were reported (1.9%). Phemister technique had higher percentage of complications (39%) than PE (19.1%) in total, but when failure to achieve adequate reduction in LLD was not included, complication rates for both were close to 14%. However, severe complications were 10.2% for Phemister group and 5.1% for PE. The high complication rates and the relative low success rate call for optimization of the timing and the applied techniques when treating LLD with permanent epiphysiodesis. Phemister technique was found to have higher percentage of severe complications than PE. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023435177).</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are percutaneous epiphysiodesis and Phemister technique effective in the treatment of leg-length discrepancy? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Tirta, Mette Holm Hjorth, Jette Frost Jepsen, Ole Rahbek, Søren Kold\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epiphysiodesis is considered the preferred treatment for children predicted to have leg length discrepancies (LLDs) 2-5 cm at maturity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on the effectiveness of permanent epiphysiodesis for LLD treatment, and secondarily to address the reported complications of permanent epiphysiodesis techniques. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with permanent epiphysiodesis. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre/post-operatively, successful/unsuccessful), physeal fusion/arrest, and complications that were graded on severity. Forty-nine studies (3051 patients) were included, 1550 underwent Phemister/modified Phemister epiphysiodesis and 1501 percutaneous epiphysiodesis (PE). Total successful permanent epiphysiodesis surgeries (16 studies) were 73.7% (516/700). Only 13 out of 23 studies had a mean final LLD of less than 1.5 cm. In total, 17.5% (513/2936) of complications were reported. 57 angular deformities were reported (1.9%). Phemister technique had higher percentage of complications (39%) than PE (19.1%) in total, but when failure to achieve adequate reduction in LLD was not included, complication rates for both were close to 14%. However, severe complications were 10.2% for Phemister group and 5.1% for PE. The high complication rates and the relative low success rate call for optimization of the timing and the applied techniques when treating LLD with permanent epiphysiodesis. Phemister technique was found to have higher percentage of severe complications than PE. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023435177).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444351/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are percutaneous epiphysiodesis and Phemister technique effective in the treatment of leg-length discrepancy? A systematic review.
Epiphysiodesis is considered the preferred treatment for children predicted to have leg length discrepancies (LLDs) 2-5 cm at maturity. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing literature on the effectiveness of permanent epiphysiodesis for LLD treatment, and secondarily to address the reported complications of permanent epiphysiodesis techniques. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus for studies on skeletally immature patients with LLD treated with permanent epiphysiodesis. The extracted outcome categories were effectiveness of epiphysiodesis (LLD measurements pre/post-operatively, successful/unsuccessful), physeal fusion/arrest, and complications that were graded on severity. Forty-nine studies (3051 patients) were included, 1550 underwent Phemister/modified Phemister epiphysiodesis and 1501 percutaneous epiphysiodesis (PE). Total successful permanent epiphysiodesis surgeries (16 studies) were 73.7% (516/700). Only 13 out of 23 studies had a mean final LLD of less than 1.5 cm. In total, 17.5% (513/2936) of complications were reported. 57 angular deformities were reported (1.9%). Phemister technique had higher percentage of complications (39%) than PE (19.1%) in total, but when failure to achieve adequate reduction in LLD was not included, complication rates for both were close to 14%. However, severe complications were 10.2% for Phemister group and 5.1% for PE. The high complication rates and the relative low success rate call for optimization of the timing and the applied techniques when treating LLD with permanent epiphysiodesis. Phemister technique was found to have higher percentage of severe complications than PE. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023435177).
期刊介绍:
The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies).
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.