不同 cIEF 系统治疗性单克隆抗体的电荷异质性:对当前形势的看法。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL mAbs Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737
Alessandro Ascione, Marcello Belfiore, Jaana Vesterinen, Mihaela Buda, Wolf Holtkamp, Francesca Luciani
{"title":"不同 cIEF 系统治疗性单克隆抗体的电荷异质性:对当前形势的看法。","authors":"Alessandro Ascione, Marcello Belfiore, Jaana Vesterinen, Mihaela Buda, Wolf Holtkamp, Francesca Luciani","doi":"10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Therapeutic mAbs show a specific \"charge fingerprint\" that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of \"horizontal standards\" for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":18206,"journal":{"name":"mAbs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Ascione, Marcello Belfiore, Jaana Vesterinen, Mihaela Buda, Wolf Holtkamp, Francesca Luciani\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Therapeutic mAbs show a specific \\\"charge fingerprint\\\" that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of \\\"horizontal standards\\\" for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mAbs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10860345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mAbs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mAbs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗用 mAb 显示出特定的 "电荷指纹",可能会影响安全性和疗效,因此常常被确定为关键质量属性 (CQA)。毛细管等电聚焦(cIEF)通常用于评估此类 CQA,它提供了一种分析工具,用于调查整个产品生命周期中 mAb 的纯度和特性。在此,我们讨论了在欧洲药典制定单克隆抗体(mAbs)质量控制 "横向标准 "的相关活动中,使用传统和全柱成像 cIEF 系统分析抗体产品的结果。这项研究旨在设计和验证一种独立的横向 cIEF 程序,以可靠地分析 mAbs 电荷变体。尽管使用了相似的实验条件,但两种 cIEF 系统在电荷曲线和测量的等电点上出现了差异。这些数据表明,结果与方法有关,而不是绝对的,这一点已为该领域和制药行业的专家所熟知,但文献中却没有适当的记载。本文从分析和监管的角度对关键影响进行了深思熟虑的讨论,并特别关注市场监督和假药识别方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation.

Therapeutic mAbs show a specific "charge fingerprint" that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of "horizontal standards" for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
mAbs
mAbs 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
11.30%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: mAbs is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to the art and science of antibody research and development. The journal has a strong scientific and medical focus, but also strives to serve a broader readership. The articles are thus of interest to scientists, clinical researchers, and physicians, as well as the wider mAb community, including our readers involved in technology transfer, legal issues, investment, strategic planning and the regulation of therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Sequence-based engineering of pH-sensitive antibodies for tumor targeting or endosomal recycling applications. Systematic analysis of Fc mutations designed to reduce binding to Fc-gamma receptors Navigating large-volume subcutaneous injections of biopharmaceuticals: a systematic review of clinical pipelines and approved products Antibody association in solution: cluster distributions and mechanisms Targeted CQA analytical control strategy for commercial antibody products: Replacing ion-exchange chromatography methods for charge heterogeneity with multi-attribute monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1