{"title":"[机器人辅助植入深部电极进行有创立体电子脑电图监测的安全性]。","authors":"I M Alekseev, Zh Zh Pekov, N V Pedyash, A A Zuev","doi":"10.17116/neiro20248801128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (<i>p</i>=0.005), insular (<i>p</i>=0.040) and occipital (<i>p</i>=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (<i>p</i>=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (<i>p</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring].\",\"authors\":\"I M Alekseev, Zh Zh Pekov, N V Pedyash, A A Zuev\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/neiro20248801128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (<i>p</i>=0.005), insular (<i>p</i>=0.040) and occipital (<i>p</i>=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (<i>p</i>=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (<i>p</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248801128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248801128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring].
Robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for stereo-EEG monitoring has become popular in recent years in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, there are still few data on safety of this technique.
Objective: To assess the incidence of complications in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes.
Material and methods: We retrospectively studied the results of implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes in 187 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. All patients underwent non-invasive preoperative examination (video-EEG, MRI, PET, SPECT, MEG). In case of insufficient data, stereo-EEG monitoring was prescribed. We determined electrode insertion trajectory using a robotic station and MR images. Implantation of electrodes was carried out using a Rosa robot (Medtech, France). All patients underwent invasive EEG monitoring after implantation.
Results: There were 11.25±3 electrodes per a patient. Implantation of one electrode took 7.5±4.9 min. Postoperative MRI revealed electrode malposition in 2.3% of cases. None was associated with complications. The complication rate per electrode was 0.6%. Complications affected stereo-EEG monitoring only in 3 cases (1.6%). The mortality rate was 0.5%. Bilateral implantation (p=0.005), insular (p=0.040) and occipital (p=0.045) deep electrode implantation were associated with lower incidence of complications. Longer duration of the procedure influenced the incidence of electrode placement in the lateral ventricle (p=0.028), and implantation in the frontal lobe was more often associated with epidural placement of electrodes (p=0.039).
Conclusion: Robot-assisted implantation of stereo-EEG electrodes is a safe procedure with minimal risk of complications. Rare electrode malposition does not usually affect invasive monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.