[用自体移植物修复股神经以治疗近端腹膜后损伤(病例报告和文献综述)]。

F S Govenko, A A Gusev, V N Komantsev, E Yu Maletsky, A D Khalikov
{"title":"[用自体移植物修复股神经以治疗近端腹膜后损伤(病例报告和文献综述)]。","authors":"F S Govenko, A A Gusev, V N Komantsev, E Yu Maletsky, A D Khalikov","doi":"10.17116/neiro20248801188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Femoral nerve damage, especially in proximal retroperitoneal space, is rare. Therefore, surgical strategy is still unclear for these patients. Various specialists discuss repair with autografts or neurotization by the obturator nerve or its muscular branch.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the diagnostic algorithm for proximal femoral nerve injury and favorable outcomes after repair with long autografts.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed movements and sensitivity using a five-point scale, as well as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and electroneuromyography data in a patient with extended iatrogenic femoral nerve damage before and after repair with long autografts (10.5 cm).</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The patient had complete femoral nerve interruption in proximal retroperitoneal space with 10-cm defect that required repair with five autografts from two sural nerves. Postoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed signs of graft survival and no neuroma within the nerve suture lines. The first signs of motor recovery occurred after 10 months. After 14 months, strength of quadriceps femoris muscle comprised 4 points, and electroneuromyography confirmed re-innervation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Femoral nerve repair with autografts for complete proximal anatomical interruption can provide sufficient restoration of movements and sensitivity. Therefore, this surgical option should be preferred instead of neurotization. Ultrasound, MRI and ENMG are valuable to clarify the diagnosis and state of the autografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Femoral nerve repair with autografts for proximal retroperitoneal damage (case report and literature review)].\",\"authors\":\"F S Govenko, A A Gusev, V N Komantsev, E Yu Maletsky, A D Khalikov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/neiro20248801188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Femoral nerve damage, especially in proximal retroperitoneal space, is rare. Therefore, surgical strategy is still unclear for these patients. Various specialists discuss repair with autografts or neurotization by the obturator nerve or its muscular branch.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate the diagnostic algorithm for proximal femoral nerve injury and favorable outcomes after repair with long autografts.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We assessed movements and sensitivity using a five-point scale, as well as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and electroneuromyography data in a patient with extended iatrogenic femoral nerve damage before and after repair with long autografts (10.5 cm).</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The patient had complete femoral nerve interruption in proximal retroperitoneal space with 10-cm defect that required repair with five autografts from two sural nerves. Postoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed signs of graft survival and no neuroma within the nerve suture lines. The first signs of motor recovery occurred after 10 months. After 14 months, strength of quadriceps femoris muscle comprised 4 points, and electroneuromyography confirmed re-innervation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Femoral nerve repair with autografts for complete proximal anatomical interruption can provide sufficient restoration of movements and sensitivity. Therefore, this surgical option should be preferred instead of neurotization. Ultrasound, MRI and ENMG are valuable to clarify the diagnosis and state of the autografts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248801188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248801188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

股神经损伤,尤其是近端腹膜后间隙的股神经损伤非常罕见。因此,这些患者的手术策略仍不明确。不同的专家讨论了自体移植修复或通过闭孔神经或其肌肉分支进行神经修复的方法:展示股骨近端神经损伤的诊断算法以及用长自体移植修复后的良好疗效:材料与方法:我们使用五点量表评估了一名股神经损伤患者在使用长自体移植物(10.5 厘米)修复前后的运动和灵敏度,以及超声、磁共振成像和电神经肌电图数据:该患者的股神经在近端腹膜后间隙完全中断,缺损处长达10厘米,需要用来自两条鞍神经的五根自体移植物进行修复。术后超声和磁共振成像显示移植物存活,神经缝合线内无神经瘤。10 个月后出现了运动恢复的最初迹象。14 个月后,股四头肌的力量达到 4 点,电神经肌电图证实神经重新支配:结论:用自体移植物修复股神经近端解剖学上的完全中断,可以充分恢复患者的运动能力和灵敏度。因此,应优先选择这种手术方式,而不是神经切断术。超声波、核磁共振成像和 ENMG 对明确诊断和自体移植物的状态很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Femoral nerve repair with autografts for proximal retroperitoneal damage (case report and literature review)].

Femoral nerve damage, especially in proximal retroperitoneal space, is rare. Therefore, surgical strategy is still unclear for these patients. Various specialists discuss repair with autografts or neurotization by the obturator nerve or its muscular branch.

Objective: To demonstrate the diagnostic algorithm for proximal femoral nerve injury and favorable outcomes after repair with long autografts.

Material and methods: We assessed movements and sensitivity using a five-point scale, as well as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and electroneuromyography data in a patient with extended iatrogenic femoral nerve damage before and after repair with long autografts (10.5 cm).

Results and discussion: The patient had complete femoral nerve interruption in proximal retroperitoneal space with 10-cm defect that required repair with five autografts from two sural nerves. Postoperative ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed signs of graft survival and no neuroma within the nerve suture lines. The first signs of motor recovery occurred after 10 months. After 14 months, strength of quadriceps femoris muscle comprised 4 points, and electroneuromyography confirmed re-innervation.

Conclusion: Femoral nerve repair with autografts for complete proximal anatomical interruption can provide sufficient restoration of movements and sensitivity. Therefore, this surgical option should be preferred instead of neurotization. Ultrasound, MRI and ENMG are valuable to clarify the diagnosis and state of the autografts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
期刊最新文献
[PET/CT with 11C-methionine in assessment of brain glioma metabolism]. [Prospective analysis of inflammatory markers and perioperative clinical data in children with craniosynostosis undergoing reconstructive surgery]. [Russian study on brain aneurysm surgery: a continuation (RIHA II)]. [Safety of robot-assisted implantation of deep electrodes for invasive stereo-EEG monitoring]. [Surgical treatment of brain tumors adjacent to corticospinal tract in children].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1