Rafael Giovani Missé, Alexandre Moura Dos Santos, Isabela Bruna Pires Borges, Marcus Vinicius Grecco, Marlise Sítima Mendes Simões Faria, Lorenza Rosa Silvério da Silva, Bruna Lindoso Correia, Ana Woo Sook Kim, Clarice Tanaka, Júlia Maria D'Andrea Greve, Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激对特发性炎症性肌病患者疼痛、疲劳和生活质量的影响:随机、双盲、假对照交叉临床试验。","authors":"Rafael Giovani Missé, Alexandre Moura Dos Santos, Isabela Bruna Pires Borges, Marcus Vinicius Grecco, Marlise Sítima Mendes Simões Faria, Lorenza Rosa Silvério da Silva, Bruna Lindoso Correia, Ana Woo Sook Kim, Clarice Tanaka, Júlia Maria D'Andrea Greve, Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo","doi":"10.1155/2024/1583506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for pain, fatigue, physical function, and health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial enrolled IIM patients with fatigue and pain who received tDCS (20 min, 2 mA) or sham stimulation for 10 daily sessions. Electrodes were placed according to the 10/20 EEG system. Both the groups underwent aerobic exercise training during the intervention period. The patients were evaluated for disease perception, pain, and fatigue using uni-multidimensional questionnaires and physical tests in the periods before and after the first and second interventions and after 12 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the tDCS intervention, a reduction in the general score of multidimensional pain of 32.0 (1.5-38.0) <i>vs.</i> 0.0 (0.0-13.4) with effect size (ES) of -0.78 was noted, and after sham intervention, a reduction of 26.0 (0.0-37.0) <i>vs</i>. 5.0 (0.0-19.2) with ES of -0.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.047) was also noted. Similar results were evidenced with fatigue (22.5 (15.4-33.2) <i>vs.</i> 5.5 (0.0-14.6) with ES of -0.82) and sham intervention (21.0 (15.8-29.5) <i>vs.</i> 4.0 (4.0-17.5) with ES of -0.80 (<i>P</i> = 0.012)). There were no differences in the domains of the fatigue and pain questionnaires. Adherence was observed in 88.8% of the patients without adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association of tDCS with aerobic training promoted additional effects in relation to the group subjected to placebo stimulation on general pain and fatigue scores, as well as on pain intensity, without changes in the subdomains of the pain and fatigue questionnaire. This trial is registered with NCT04678635.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain, Fatigue, and Health Quality of Life of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Giovani Missé, Alexandre Moura Dos Santos, Isabela Bruna Pires Borges, Marcus Vinicius Grecco, Marlise Sítima Mendes Simões Faria, Lorenza Rosa Silvério da Silva, Bruna Lindoso Correia, Ana Woo Sook Kim, Clarice Tanaka, Júlia Maria D'Andrea Greve, Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1583506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for pain, fatigue, physical function, and health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial enrolled IIM patients with fatigue and pain who received tDCS (20 min, 2 mA) or sham stimulation for 10 daily sessions. Electrodes were placed according to the 10/20 EEG system. Both the groups underwent aerobic exercise training during the intervention period. The patients were evaluated for disease perception, pain, and fatigue using uni-multidimensional questionnaires and physical tests in the periods before and after the first and second interventions and after 12 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the tDCS intervention, a reduction in the general score of multidimensional pain of 32.0 (1.5-38.0) <i>vs.</i> 0.0 (0.0-13.4) with effect size (ES) of -0.78 was noted, and after sham intervention, a reduction of 26.0 (0.0-37.0) <i>vs</i>. 5.0 (0.0-19.2) with ES of -0.54 (<i>P</i> = 0.047) was also noted. Similar results were evidenced with fatigue (22.5 (15.4-33.2) <i>vs.</i> 5.5 (0.0-14.6) with ES of -0.82) and sham intervention (21.0 (15.8-29.5) <i>vs.</i> 4.0 (4.0-17.5) with ES of -0.80 (<i>P</i> = 0.012)). There were no differences in the domains of the fatigue and pain questionnaires. Adherence was observed in 88.8% of the patients without adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The association of tDCS with aerobic training promoted additional effects in relation to the group subjected to placebo stimulation on general pain and fatigue scores, as well as on pain intensity, without changes in the subdomains of the pain and fatigue questionnaire. This trial is registered with NCT04678635.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1583506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1583506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)患者的疼痛、疲劳、身体功能和健康相关生活质量的影响:这项随机、双盲、假对照、交叉临床试验招募了疲劳和疼痛的特发性炎症性肌病患者,他们每天接受 10 次 tDCS(20 分钟,2 毫安)或假刺激。电极根据 10/20 脑电图系统放置。两组患者在干预期间都接受了有氧运动训练。在第一次和第二次干预前后以及随访 12 周后,使用单多维问卷和体能测试对患者的疾病感知、疼痛和疲劳程度进行评估:tDCS干预后,多维疼痛总分降低了32.0(1.5-38.0)分 vs. 0.0(0.0-13.4)分,效应大小(ES)为-0.78;假干预后,多维疼痛总分降低了26.0(0.0-37.0)分 vs. 5.0(0.0-19.2)分,效应大小(ES)为-0.54(P = 0.047)。疲劳(22.5 (15.4-33.2) vs. 5.5 (0.0-14.6),ES 为-0.82)和假干预(21.0 (15.8-29.5) vs. 4.0 (4.0-17.5),ES 为-0.80 (P = 0.012))也有类似结果。在疲劳和疼痛问卷调查的领域中没有差异。88.8%的患者坚持治疗,无不良反应:结论:与安慰剂刺激组相比,tDCS与有氧训练的结合对一般疼痛和疲劳评分以及疼痛强度产生了额外的效果,但疼痛和疲劳问卷的子域没有发生变化。该试验已在 NCT04678635 上注册。
Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pain, Fatigue, and Health Quality of Life of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for pain, fatigue, physical function, and health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover clinical trial enrolled IIM patients with fatigue and pain who received tDCS (20 min, 2 mA) or sham stimulation for 10 daily sessions. Electrodes were placed according to the 10/20 EEG system. Both the groups underwent aerobic exercise training during the intervention period. The patients were evaluated for disease perception, pain, and fatigue using uni-multidimensional questionnaires and physical tests in the periods before and after the first and second interventions and after 12 weeks of follow-up.
Results: After the tDCS intervention, a reduction in the general score of multidimensional pain of 32.0 (1.5-38.0) vs. 0.0 (0.0-13.4) with effect size (ES) of -0.78 was noted, and after sham intervention, a reduction of 26.0 (0.0-37.0) vs. 5.0 (0.0-19.2) with ES of -0.54 (P = 0.047) was also noted. Similar results were evidenced with fatigue (22.5 (15.4-33.2) vs. 5.5 (0.0-14.6) with ES of -0.82) and sham intervention (21.0 (15.8-29.5) vs. 4.0 (4.0-17.5) with ES of -0.80 (P = 0.012)). There were no differences in the domains of the fatigue and pain questionnaires. Adherence was observed in 88.8% of the patients without adverse events.
Conclusion: The association of tDCS with aerobic training promoted additional effects in relation to the group subjected to placebo stimulation on general pain and fatigue scores, as well as on pain intensity, without changes in the subdomains of the pain and fatigue questionnaire. This trial is registered with NCT04678635.