负责任的特派团治理:综合框架和研究议程

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100820
Martijn Wiarda , Matthijs J. Janssen , Tom B.J. Coenen , Neelke Doorn
{"title":"负责任的特派团治理:综合框架和研究议程","authors":"Martijn Wiarda ,&nbsp;Matthijs J. Janssen ,&nbsp;Tom B.J. Coenen ,&nbsp;Neelke Doorn","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Governance lies at the heart of instigating, steering, and creating the conditions for mission-oriented transitions that potentially help resolve some of our grand societal challenges. In doing so, policymakers will need to navigate both epistemic and normative considerations to develop, implement, and evaluate missions responsibly. A number of scholars have therefore expressed the need for a better conceptualization of responsible mission governance as a procedural approach, particularly with the aim of coping with the <em>complexity, uncertainty</em>, and <em>contestation</em> that render these wicked problems <em>intractable</em>. In this paper we develop an integrative framework for responsible mission governance by taking wickedness dimensions as our entry point. Accordingly, we argue that responsible mission governance should integrate various complementary governance responsibilities (e.g., reflexivity) and modes (e.g., reflexive governance) that potentially improve the effectiveness and desirability of missions. We conclude by discussing urgent avenues for future research</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100820"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400011X/pdfft?md5=d5892424db74fd3d47dc1e6c1c9b4d72&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400011X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsible mission governance: An integrative framework and research agenda\",\"authors\":\"Martijn Wiarda ,&nbsp;Matthijs J. Janssen ,&nbsp;Tom B.J. Coenen ,&nbsp;Neelke Doorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Governance lies at the heart of instigating, steering, and creating the conditions for mission-oriented transitions that potentially help resolve some of our grand societal challenges. In doing so, policymakers will need to navigate both epistemic and normative considerations to develop, implement, and evaluate missions responsibly. A number of scholars have therefore expressed the need for a better conceptualization of responsible mission governance as a procedural approach, particularly with the aim of coping with the <em>complexity, uncertainty</em>, and <em>contestation</em> that render these wicked problems <em>intractable</em>. In this paper we develop an integrative framework for responsible mission governance by taking wickedness dimensions as our entry point. Accordingly, we argue that responsible mission governance should integrate various complementary governance responsibilities (e.g., reflexivity) and modes (e.g., reflexive governance) that potentially improve the effectiveness and desirability of missions. We conclude by discussing urgent avenues for future research</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400011X/pdfft?md5=d5892424db74fd3d47dc1e6c1c9b4d72&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400011X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400011X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400011X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治理是推动、指导和创造条件以任务为导向的转型的核心,这种转型可能有助于解决我们面临的一些重大社会挑战。在此过程中,政策制定者需要从认识论和规范论两方面考虑,以负责任的方式制定、实施和评估使命。因此,许多学者都表示有必要将负责任的任务治理更好地概念化为一种程序性方法,尤其是为了应对复杂性、不确定性和争议性,这些因素使得这些棘手的问题变得难以解决。在本文中,我们以 "邪恶 "维度为切入点,为负责任的使命治理建立了一个综合框架。因此,我们认为负责任的使命治理应整合各种互补的治理责任(如反思性)和模式(如反思性治理),从而提高使命的有效性和可取性。最后,我们讨论了未来研究的紧迫途径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Responsible mission governance: An integrative framework and research agenda

Governance lies at the heart of instigating, steering, and creating the conditions for mission-oriented transitions that potentially help resolve some of our grand societal challenges. In doing so, policymakers will need to navigate both epistemic and normative considerations to develop, implement, and evaluate missions responsibly. A number of scholars have therefore expressed the need for a better conceptualization of responsible mission governance as a procedural approach, particularly with the aim of coping with the complexity, uncertainty, and contestation that render these wicked problems intractable. In this paper we develop an integrative framework for responsible mission governance by taking wickedness dimensions as our entry point. Accordingly, we argue that responsible mission governance should integrate various complementary governance responsibilities (e.g., reflexivity) and modes (e.g., reflexive governance) that potentially improve the effectiveness and desirability of missions. We conclude by discussing urgent avenues for future research

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sector collaboration, nonprofit readiness, and sustainability transitions Navigating sustainable transition processes at the local level: The case of Energy Island Bornholm The dynamics of change towards sustainability in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana's Waste-to-Energy transition Ideas behind transformative innovation policy: Economists confronting missions and sustainability transition in Finland Hibernation of off-grid solar e-waste in Kenya: An unintended response to an emerging waste issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1