评估中枢神经系统受累的成人急性髓性白血病患者临床疗效的系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107452
Hannah Goulart , Dahniel Sastow , Erin Moshier , Lily Martin , John Mascarenhas , Douglas Tremblay
{"title":"评估中枢神经系统受累的成人急性髓性白血病患者临床疗效的系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Hannah Goulart ,&nbsp;Dahniel Sastow ,&nbsp;Erin Moshier ,&nbsp;Lily Martin ,&nbsp;John Mascarenhas ,&nbsp;Douglas Tremblay","doi":"10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may experience extramedullary involvement when disease is present outside of the blood and bone marrow. In particular, the presence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement has traditionally been thought of as a poor prognostic factor. In the presently available literature, there is a paucity of conclusive data surrounding CNS AML given its rarity and lack of unified screening practices. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to more definitively characterize survival outcomes in this patient population. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated survival outcomes and response rates from clinical studies on patients with AML stratified by the presence of CNS involvement. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis with a resulting hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) of 1.34 with a 95 % CI of 1.14 to 1.58. These findings suggest that CNS involvement in adult patients with AML is associated with an increased hazard of mortality compared to those patients without CNS involvement. As such, CNS involvement should be viewed as negative prognostic marker, and attention should be made to ensure prompt identification and treatment of patients who experience this complication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18051,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia research","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 107452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients with central nervous system involvement\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Goulart ,&nbsp;Dahniel Sastow ,&nbsp;Erin Moshier ,&nbsp;Lily Martin ,&nbsp;John Mascarenhas ,&nbsp;Douglas Tremblay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may experience extramedullary involvement when disease is present outside of the blood and bone marrow. In particular, the presence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement has traditionally been thought of as a poor prognostic factor. In the presently available literature, there is a paucity of conclusive data surrounding CNS AML given its rarity and lack of unified screening practices. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to more definitively characterize survival outcomes in this patient population. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated survival outcomes and response rates from clinical studies on patients with AML stratified by the presence of CNS involvement. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis with a resulting hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) of 1.34 with a 95 % CI of 1.14 to 1.58. These findings suggest that CNS involvement in adult patients with AML is associated with an increased hazard of mortality compared to those patients without CNS involvement. As such, CNS involvement should be viewed as negative prognostic marker, and attention should be made to ensure prompt identification and treatment of patients who experience this complication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia research\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212624000183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212624000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性髓性白血病(AML)患者可能会出现髓外受累,即疾病出现在血液和骨髓之外。尤其是中枢神经系统(CNS)受累,历来被认为是预后不良的因素。在现有的文献中,由于中枢神经系统急性髓细胞白血病罕见且缺乏统一的筛查方法,因此有关中枢神经系统急性髓细胞白血病的确凿数据很少。因此,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以更明确地描述这一患者群体的生存结果。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了按中枢神经系统受累情况分层的急性髓细胞性白血病患者临床研究的生存结果和反应率。荟萃分析共纳入了 12 项研究,结果显示总生存率 (OS) 的危险比 (HR) 为 1.34,95 % CI 为 1.14 至 1.58。这些研究结果表明,与无中枢神经系统受累的患者相比,成年急性髓细胞性白血病患者的中枢神经系统受累与死亡率增加有关。因此,中枢神经系统受累应被视为预后的负面指标,应注意确保及时发现和治疗出现这种并发症的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating clinical outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients with central nervous system involvement

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may experience extramedullary involvement when disease is present outside of the blood and bone marrow. In particular, the presence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement has traditionally been thought of as a poor prognostic factor. In the presently available literature, there is a paucity of conclusive data surrounding CNS AML given its rarity and lack of unified screening practices. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to more definitively characterize survival outcomes in this patient population. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated survival outcomes and response rates from clinical studies on patients with AML stratified by the presence of CNS involvement. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis with a resulting hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) of 1.34 with a 95 % CI of 1.14 to 1.58. These findings suggest that CNS involvement in adult patients with AML is associated with an increased hazard of mortality compared to those patients without CNS involvement. As such, CNS involvement should be viewed as negative prognostic marker, and attention should be made to ensure prompt identification and treatment of patients who experience this complication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia research
Leukemia research 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia Research an international journal which brings comprehensive and current information to all health care professionals involved in basic and applied clinical research in hematological malignancies. The editors encourage the submission of articles relevant to hematological malignancies. The Journal scope includes reporting studies of cellular and molecular biology, genetics, immunology, epidemiology, clinical evaluation, and therapy of these diseases.
期刊最新文献
Recent progress in pathological understanding of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in the new classification era. Immunological aspects of HTLV-1 persistence; for the prevention and treatment of Adult T-cell leukaemia-lymphoma (ATL). Editorial Board Predictive modeling of outcomes in acute leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using machine learning techniques Real-world impact of luspatercept on red blood cell transfusions among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: A United States healthcare claims database study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1