比较人工神经网络和回归分析在气道乘客估算中的应用

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Air Transport Management Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102553
Didem Ari, Pinar Mizrak Ozfirat
{"title":"比较人工神经网络和回归分析在气道乘客估算中的应用","authors":"Didem Ari,&nbsp;Pinar Mizrak Ozfirat","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increasing demand in operations, time is getting more important. In order to use time and energy more effectively, it is becoming more important for airline companies and airport managements to make strategic plans for the future. To make beneficial and correct strategic plans for airways, one of the factors that is needed to be considered is future passenger numbers. With more accurate passenger number forecasts, airport managements can act more efficiently and reduce time, energy consumption and hence would be able to reduce costs. In this study, airway passenger number estimation is handled. Three metropolitan cities’ airport passenger numbers are considered. Artificial neural networks and regression analysis are carried out to estimate passenger number. In addition, data are handled in two different ways. Firstly, ANN and regression analysis are applied using original data series. In the second step, seasonal decomposition is applied on the data series and both approaches are repeated for deseasonal series. In Artificial Neural Networks approach, an experimental design is developed considering training algorithms, number of input nodes and number of nodes in the hidden layer which make up 960 design points. In the results of these experiments, performance of ANN approach is tested for three input factors and high-performance design points are identified. Furthermore, for benchmarking purposes, regression analysis is carried out. Linear, logarithmic, power, exponential, and polynomial models are developed. Finally, results of ANN and regression approaches are compared in terms of mean absolute percent error, and it is found that ANN overperformed compared to regression analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of artificial neural networks and regression analysis for airway passenger estimation\",\"authors\":\"Didem Ari,&nbsp;Pinar Mizrak Ozfirat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the increasing demand in operations, time is getting more important. In order to use time and energy more effectively, it is becoming more important for airline companies and airport managements to make strategic plans for the future. To make beneficial and correct strategic plans for airways, one of the factors that is needed to be considered is future passenger numbers. With more accurate passenger number forecasts, airport managements can act more efficiently and reduce time, energy consumption and hence would be able to reduce costs. In this study, airway passenger number estimation is handled. Three metropolitan cities’ airport passenger numbers are considered. Artificial neural networks and regression analysis are carried out to estimate passenger number. In addition, data are handled in two different ways. Firstly, ANN and regression analysis are applied using original data series. In the second step, seasonal decomposition is applied on the data series and both approaches are repeated for deseasonal series. In Artificial Neural Networks approach, an experimental design is developed considering training algorithms, number of input nodes and number of nodes in the hidden layer which make up 960 design points. In the results of these experiments, performance of ANN approach is tested for three input factors and high-performance design points are identified. Furthermore, for benchmarking purposes, regression analysis is carried out. Linear, logarithmic, power, exponential, and polynomial models are developed. Finally, results of ANN and regression approaches are compared in terms of mean absolute percent error, and it is found that ANN overperformed compared to regression analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000188\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着业务需求的不断增长,时间变得越来越重要。为了更有效地利用时间和精力,航空公司和机场管理部门制定未来战略计划变得越来越重要。要为航空公司制定有益和正确的战略计划,需要考虑的因素之一就是未来的乘客人数。有了更准确的乘客人数预测,机场管理部门就能更有效地采取行动,减少时间和能源消耗,从而降低成本。在本研究中,将对机场乘客人数进行估算。研究考虑了三个大都市的机场乘客人数。通过人工神经网络和回归分析来估算乘客数量。此外,还采用两种不同的方法处理数据。首先,使用原始数据序列进行人工神经网络和回归分析。第二步,对数据序列进行季节分解,然后对非季节序列重复这两种方法。在人工神经网络方法中,考虑到训练算法、输入节点数和隐层节点数,制定了一个实验设计,其中包括 960 个设计点。在这些实验结果中,针对三个输入因素测试了人工神经网络方法的性能,并确定了高性能设计点。此外,为了确定基准,还进行了回归分析。建立了线性模型、对数模型、幂模型、指数模型和多项式模型。最后,从平均绝对误差百分比的角度对 ANN 和回归方法的结果进行了比较,发现 ANN 的性能优于回归分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of artificial neural networks and regression analysis for airway passenger estimation

With the increasing demand in operations, time is getting more important. In order to use time and energy more effectively, it is becoming more important for airline companies and airport managements to make strategic plans for the future. To make beneficial and correct strategic plans for airways, one of the factors that is needed to be considered is future passenger numbers. With more accurate passenger number forecasts, airport managements can act more efficiently and reduce time, energy consumption and hence would be able to reduce costs. In this study, airway passenger number estimation is handled. Three metropolitan cities’ airport passenger numbers are considered. Artificial neural networks and regression analysis are carried out to estimate passenger number. In addition, data are handled in two different ways. Firstly, ANN and regression analysis are applied using original data series. In the second step, seasonal decomposition is applied on the data series and both approaches are repeated for deseasonal series. In Artificial Neural Networks approach, an experimental design is developed considering training algorithms, number of input nodes and number of nodes in the hidden layer which make up 960 design points. In the results of these experiments, performance of ANN approach is tested for three input factors and high-performance design points are identified. Furthermore, for benchmarking purposes, regression analysis is carried out. Linear, logarithmic, power, exponential, and polynomial models are developed. Finally, results of ANN and regression approaches are compared in terms of mean absolute percent error, and it is found that ANN overperformed compared to regression analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability
期刊最新文献
Stochastic infection risk models for aircraft seat assignment considering passenger vaccination status and seat location Addressing the impact of airport pricing, investment and operations on greenhouse gas emissions Editorial Board A privacy-preserving federated learning approach for airline upgrade optimization Exploring prediction accuracy for optimal taxi times in airport operations using various machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1