平衡测试成绩与社区居家老年人全因死亡率的预测:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Research on Aging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1177/01640275241232392
Saibal Das, Bhavani S Bagepally, Madhavi Eerike, Jerin J Cherian, Shreyashi Dasgupta, George Mathews, Shailaja Rao
{"title":"平衡测试成绩与社区居家老年人全因死亡率的预测:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Saibal Das, Bhavani S Bagepally, Madhavi Eerike, Jerin J Cherian, Shreyashi Dasgupta, George Mathews, Shailaja Rao","doi":"10.1177/01640275241232392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between an inability to perform a static balance test and mortality in community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled (random-effect model). Meta-regression was performed with independent demographic variables (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022381137). <b>Results:</b> A total of 11,713 articles were screened and 15 were included. An inability to perform a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality irrespective of whether confounding variables were considered [HR, 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07-1.21); <i>p</i> < .001; i<sup>2</sup>, 87.96% (<i>p</i> < .01)] or not [HR, 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.20); <i>p</i> = .01; i<sup>2</sup>, 95.28% (<i>p</i> < .01)] (both moderate GRADE evidence). Also, this association was correlated with progressive age. <b>Conclusion:</b> An inability to successfully complete a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality among community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":" ","pages":"437-448"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance in a Balance Test and Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Community-Dwelling Elderly Ambulatory Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Saibal Das, Bhavani S Bagepally, Madhavi Eerike, Jerin J Cherian, Shreyashi Dasgupta, George Mathews, Shailaja Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01640275241232392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between an inability to perform a static balance test and mortality in community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals. <b>Methods:</b> PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled (random-effect model). Meta-regression was performed with independent demographic variables (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022381137). <b>Results:</b> A total of 11,713 articles were screened and 15 were included. An inability to perform a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality irrespective of whether confounding variables were considered [HR, 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07-1.21); <i>p</i> < .001; i<sup>2</sup>, 87.96% (<i>p</i> < .01)] or not [HR, 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.20); <i>p</i> = .01; i<sup>2</sup>, 95.28% (<i>p</i> < .01)] (both moderate GRADE evidence). Also, this association was correlated with progressive age. <b>Conclusion:</b> An inability to successfully complete a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality among community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"437-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275241232392\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275241232392","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估无法进行静态平衡测试与社区居家老年人死亡率之间的关系。研究方法检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 上的相关队列研究。对危险比(HR)进行了汇总(随机效应模型)。使用独立人口统计学变量进行元回归(PROSPERO ID:CRD42022381137)。结果共筛选出 11,713 篇文章,其中 15 篇被纳入。无论是否考虑混杂变量[HR,1.14 (95% CI: 1.07-1.21);p < .001;i2,87.96% (p < .01)],无法进行静态平衡测试都与较高的死亡风险显著相关[HR,1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.20);p = .01;i2,95.28% (p < .01)](均为中度 GRADE 证据)。此外,这种关联还与渐进年龄相关。结论无法成功完成静态平衡测试与社区居住的行动不便老年人较高的死亡风险密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance in a Balance Test and Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Community-Dwelling Elderly Ambulatory Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between an inability to perform a static balance test and mortality in community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant cohort studies. Hazard ratios (HR) were pooled (random-effect model). Meta-regression was performed with independent demographic variables (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022381137). Results: A total of 11,713 articles were screened and 15 were included. An inability to perform a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality irrespective of whether confounding variables were considered [HR, 1.14 (95% CI: 1.07-1.21); p < .001; i2, 87.96% (p < .01)] or not [HR, 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03-1.20); p = .01; i2, 95.28% (p < .01)] (both moderate GRADE evidence). Also, this association was correlated with progressive age. Conclusion: An inability to successfully complete a static balance test was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality among community-dwelling older ambulatory individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation. The Effects of Spousal Caregiving on Middle-Age and Older Caregivers' Health and Well-Being: Evidence From Vietnam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1