了解急诊医学实习经历及其对专业选择的潜在影响:定性研究

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10932
Rosemarie Diaz MD, MPH, Sarah Balgord MD, Nicole Klekowski MD, Alexandra S. Farthing MD, MPH, Sylvia Guadalupe Escolero MD, Korynne DeCloux MD, John C. Burkhardt MD, PhD, Adrianne N. Haggins MD, MS, Laura R. Hopson MD
{"title":"了解急诊医学实习经历及其对专业选择的潜在影响:定性研究","authors":"Rosemarie Diaz MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sarah Balgord MD,&nbsp;Nicole Klekowski MD,&nbsp;Alexandra S. Farthing MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sylvia Guadalupe Escolero MD,&nbsp;Korynne DeCloux MD,&nbsp;John C. Burkhardt MD, PhD,&nbsp;Adrianne N. Haggins MD, MS,&nbsp;Laura R. Hopson MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) is experiencing a significant decrease in student interest. In addition, women are historically underrepresented within the specialty at all levels of training and practice. We sought to understand how clinical experiences and perceptions of EM influence specialty selection by medical students, particularly women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed semistructured interviews with senior medical students who considered EM as a specialty. We used purposive sampling to recruit from diverse learning environments and represent a variety of experiences. Participants reflected on their specialty selection process and experiences in EM including their perceived acceptance in the work environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five medical students from 11 geographically diverse schools participated. A total of 68% (17/25) identified as women. The majority (21/25, 84%) planned on applying to EM residency. We identified four major themes: (1) distressing interpersonal interactions with patients and the ED care team negatively affect students; (2) EM culture includes behaviors that are perceived as exclusionary; (3) beliefs about the attributes of an ideal EM physician and the specialty itself have a gendered nature; and (4) ease of access to mentors, representation, and early exposure to EM environment increased interest in specialty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our participants express that EM causes challenges for students to accept the norms of behavior in the field, which is an essential element in joining a group and professional identity formation. In addition, we raise concern that gendered perceptions and language may send exclusionary environmental cues that may negatively impact recruitment of a diverse physician workforce.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10932","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding clerkship experiences in emergency medicine and their potential influence on specialty selection: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Rosemarie Diaz MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sarah Balgord MD,&nbsp;Nicole Klekowski MD,&nbsp;Alexandra S. Farthing MD, MPH,&nbsp;Sylvia Guadalupe Escolero MD,&nbsp;Korynne DeCloux MD,&nbsp;John C. Burkhardt MD, PhD,&nbsp;Adrianne N. Haggins MD, MS,&nbsp;Laura R. Hopson MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) is experiencing a significant decrease in student interest. In addition, women are historically underrepresented within the specialty at all levels of training and practice. We sought to understand how clinical experiences and perceptions of EM influence specialty selection by medical students, particularly women.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed semistructured interviews with senior medical students who considered EM as a specialty. We used purposive sampling to recruit from diverse learning environments and represent a variety of experiences. Participants reflected on their specialty selection process and experiences in EM including their perceived acceptance in the work environment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-five medical students from 11 geographically diverse schools participated. A total of 68% (17/25) identified as women. The majority (21/25, 84%) planned on applying to EM residency. We identified four major themes: (1) distressing interpersonal interactions with patients and the ED care team negatively affect students; (2) EM culture includes behaviors that are perceived as exclusionary; (3) beliefs about the attributes of an ideal EM physician and the specialty itself have a gendered nature; and (4) ease of access to mentors, representation, and early exposure to EM environment increased interest in specialty.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our participants express that EM causes challenges for students to accept the norms of behavior in the field, which is an essential element in joining a group and professional identity formation. In addition, we raise concern that gendered perceptions and language may send exclusionary environmental cues that may negatively impact recruitment of a diverse physician workforce.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10932\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 急诊医学(EM)专业的学生兴趣正在显著下降。此外,在该专业的各级培训和实践中,女性的比例历来偏低。我们试图了解临床经验和对急诊医学的认知如何影响医学生(尤其是女生)的专业选择。 方法 我们采用建构主义基础理论方法,分析了对考虑将电磁学作为一个专业的高年级医学生进行的半结构化访谈。我们采用有目的的抽样,从不同的学习环境中招募代表不同经历的学生。参与者对他们的专业选择过程和在 EM 的经历进行了反思,包括他们在工作环境中的接受程度。 结果 来自 11 所不同地区学校的 25 名医学生参加了调查。共有 68% 的学生(17/25)认为自己是女性。大多数学生(21/25,84%)计划申请成为急诊科住院医师。我们确定了四大主题:(1)与患者和急诊室护理团队之间令人苦恼的人际互动对学生产生了负面影响;(2)急诊室文化包括被认为具有排斥性的行为;(3)对理想急诊室医生的特质和该专业本身的信念具有性别特征;以及(4)容易接触导师、代表和早期接触急诊室环境提高了对该专业的兴趣。 结论 我们的参与者表示,电磁学给学生接受该领域的行为规范带来了挑战,而这是加入一个团体和形成职业认同的基本要素。此外,我们还担心,性别观念和语言可能会发出排斥性的环境暗示,从而对多元化医生队伍的招聘产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding clerkship experiences in emergency medicine and their potential influence on specialty selection: A qualitative study

Objectives

The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) is experiencing a significant decrease in student interest. In addition, women are historically underrepresented within the specialty at all levels of training and practice. We sought to understand how clinical experiences and perceptions of EM influence specialty selection by medical students, particularly women.

Methods

Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we analyzed semistructured interviews with senior medical students who considered EM as a specialty. We used purposive sampling to recruit from diverse learning environments and represent a variety of experiences. Participants reflected on their specialty selection process and experiences in EM including their perceived acceptance in the work environment.

Results

Twenty-five medical students from 11 geographically diverse schools participated. A total of 68% (17/25) identified as women. The majority (21/25, 84%) planned on applying to EM residency. We identified four major themes: (1) distressing interpersonal interactions with patients and the ED care team negatively affect students; (2) EM culture includes behaviors that are perceived as exclusionary; (3) beliefs about the attributes of an ideal EM physician and the specialty itself have a gendered nature; and (4) ease of access to mentors, representation, and early exposure to EM environment increased interest in specialty.

Conclusions

Our participants express that EM causes challenges for students to accept the norms of behavior in the field, which is an essential element in joining a group and professional identity formation. In addition, we raise concern that gendered perceptions and language may send exclusionary environmental cues that may negatively impact recruitment of a diverse physician workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Changing behavior and promoting clinical empathy through a patient experience curriculum for health profession students Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1