{"title":"颞下颌关节体积以及髁状突和盂窝形态的三维评估:锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。","authors":"Shivam Mehta, Vaibhav Gandhi, Apexa Patel, Po-Jung Chen, Meng-Hsuan Lin, Chia-Ling Kuo, Aditya Tadinada, Sumit Yadav","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_254_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The condylar and glenoid fossa morphology can alter in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), which can lead to changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space volume. Volumetric evaluation of TMJ can represent the entire three-dimensional (3D)-joint space between the condyle and glenoid fossa.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To perform 3D assessment of TMJ volume, condylar, and glenoid-fossa morphology using cone-beam computed tomography and evaluate the correlation between these parameters.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Thirty-four patients (age: 13.50 years) who had no previous history of TMD were included.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The volume of TMJ space was measured and divided into anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral TMJ volume. The antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) condylar width, AP and ML glenoid-fossa width, and glenoid-fossa depth were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed with R software at a 0.05 significance level. Each parameter was compared between the left and right sides using a paired-t test. The correlations between the parameters were obtained by the Pearson correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between lateral and medial TMJ volume; however, posterior TMJ volume was significantly greater than anterior TMJ volume. A significant correlation was observed between AP glenoid-fossa width and TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa depth and TMJ volume, AP position of the condyle and anterior TMJ volume, ML position of the condyle and medial TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa width and condyle width in AP and ML dimension, glenoid-fossa depth and AP glenoid-fossa width.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to the evaluation of condylar and glenoid-fossa morphology, assessment of TMJ space volume is important for comprehensive evaluation of the joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10855514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Volume, and Condylar and Glenoid-fossa Morphology: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shivam Mehta, Vaibhav Gandhi, Apexa Patel, Po-Jung Chen, Meng-Hsuan Lin, Chia-Ling Kuo, Aditya Tadinada, Sumit Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ccd.ccd_254_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The condylar and glenoid fossa morphology can alter in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), which can lead to changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space volume. Volumetric evaluation of TMJ can represent the entire three-dimensional (3D)-joint space between the condyle and glenoid fossa.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To perform 3D assessment of TMJ volume, condylar, and glenoid-fossa morphology using cone-beam computed tomography and evaluate the correlation between these parameters.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Thirty-four patients (age: 13.50 years) who had no previous history of TMD were included.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The volume of TMJ space was measured and divided into anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral TMJ volume. The antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) condylar width, AP and ML glenoid-fossa width, and glenoid-fossa depth were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Statistical analyses were performed with R software at a 0.05 significance level. Each parameter was compared between the left and right sides using a paired-t test. The correlations between the parameters were obtained by the Pearson correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between lateral and medial TMJ volume; however, posterior TMJ volume was significantly greater than anterior TMJ volume. A significant correlation was observed between AP glenoid-fossa width and TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa depth and TMJ volume, AP position of the condyle and anterior TMJ volume, ML position of the condyle and medial TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa width and condyle width in AP and ML dimension, glenoid-fossa depth and AP glenoid-fossa width.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In addition to the evaluation of condylar and glenoid-fossa morphology, assessment of TMJ space volume is important for comprehensive evaluation of the joint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10855514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_254_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_254_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)患者的髁状突和盂窝形态会发生改变,从而导致颞下颌关节(TMJ)空间体积发生变化。颞下颌关节的容积评估可以代表髁状突和盂窝之间的整个三维(3D)关节空间。目的:使用锥束计算机断层扫描对颞下颌关节容积、髁状突和盂窝形态进行三维评估,并评估这些参数之间的相关性:34名既往无TMD病史的患者(年龄:13.50岁):测量颞下颌关节间隙的体积,并将其分为颞下颌关节前部、后部、内侧和外侧的体积。评估了髁状突前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)宽度、AP 和 ML盂窝宽度以及盂窝深度:使用 R 软件进行统计分析,显著性水平为 0.05。采用配对 t 检验比较左右两侧的各项参数。参数之间的相关性通过皮尔逊相关系数得出:结果:颞下颌关节外侧和内侧的体积无明显差异;但颞下颌关节后侧的体积明显大于颞下颌关节前侧的体积。AP盂窝宽度与颞下颌关节体积、盂窝深度与颞下颌关节体积、髁状突的AP位置与颞下颌关节前部体积、髁状突的ML位置与颞下颌关节内侧体积、盂窝宽度与髁状突在AP和ML维度上的宽度、盂窝深度与AP盂窝宽度之间存在明显相关性:除了髁状突和盂窝形态的评估外,颞下颌关节间隙容积的评估对于关节的综合评估也很重要。
Three-dimensional Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Volume, and Condylar and Glenoid-fossa Morphology: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study.
Background: The condylar and glenoid fossa morphology can alter in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), which can lead to changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space volume. Volumetric evaluation of TMJ can represent the entire three-dimensional (3D)-joint space between the condyle and glenoid fossa.
Aims: To perform 3D assessment of TMJ volume, condylar, and glenoid-fossa morphology using cone-beam computed tomography and evaluate the correlation between these parameters.
Settings and design: Thirty-four patients (age: 13.50 years) who had no previous history of TMD were included.
Materials and methods: The volume of TMJ space was measured and divided into anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral TMJ volume. The antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) condylar width, AP and ML glenoid-fossa width, and glenoid-fossa depth were evaluated.
Statistical analysis used: Statistical analyses were performed with R software at a 0.05 significance level. Each parameter was compared between the left and right sides using a paired-t test. The correlations between the parameters were obtained by the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: There was no significant difference between lateral and medial TMJ volume; however, posterior TMJ volume was significantly greater than anterior TMJ volume. A significant correlation was observed between AP glenoid-fossa width and TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa depth and TMJ volume, AP position of the condyle and anterior TMJ volume, ML position of the condyle and medial TMJ volume, glenoid-fossa width and condyle width in AP and ML dimension, glenoid-fossa depth and AP glenoid-fossa width.
Conclusions: In addition to the evaluation of condylar and glenoid-fossa morphology, assessment of TMJ space volume is important for comprehensive evaluation of the joint.