由护士主导的脓毒性休克患者输液反应性评估:一项质量改进计划。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical care nurse Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.4037/ccn2024984
Yana Dilman, Claire Bethel, Navitha Ramesh, Charlene Myers
{"title":"由护士主导的脓毒性休克患者输液反应性评估:一项质量改进计划。","authors":"Yana Dilman, Claire Bethel, Navitha Ramesh, Charlene Myers","doi":"10.4037/ccn2024984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluid responsiveness should be assessed in patients with septic shock because only 50% of patients are fluid responsive. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, like pulse pressure variation measured after a passive leg raise maneuver, are recommended to guide fluid administration in patients with sepsis after initial fluid resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>The purpose of the project was to evaluate outcomes after implementing a nurse-driven fluid responsiveness evaluation using passive leg raise and pulse pressure variation measurement in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project included 30 adult patients with septic shock in a 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit at a community hospital. A new nursing process was initiated for bedside fluid responsiveness evaluation (pulse pressure variation measurement after passive leg raise). Staff members received in-person individual training sessions. Preintervention and 20-week postintervention patient outcomes data were collected to estimate the project's impact on incidence of fluid overload and acute kidney injury, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Preintervention and postintervention staff satisfaction surveys assessed nurses' perception of the project's value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before intervention, 24 of 37 patients (65%) met criteria of fluid overload. The project resulted in a 28% decrease in the incidence of fluid overload. Staff satisfaction surveys revealed a significant increase in nurses' feelings of empowerment to positively affect patient outcomes; all nurses agreed that the new process was efficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the project had a positive impact on patient outcomes and nurse autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"44 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse-Driven Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Patients With Septic Shock: A Quality Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Yana Dilman, Claire Bethel, Navitha Ramesh, Charlene Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ccn2024984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluid responsiveness should be assessed in patients with septic shock because only 50% of patients are fluid responsive. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, like pulse pressure variation measured after a passive leg raise maneuver, are recommended to guide fluid administration in patients with sepsis after initial fluid resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>The purpose of the project was to evaluate outcomes after implementing a nurse-driven fluid responsiveness evaluation using passive leg raise and pulse pressure variation measurement in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project included 30 adult patients with septic shock in a 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit at a community hospital. A new nursing process was initiated for bedside fluid responsiveness evaluation (pulse pressure variation measurement after passive leg raise). Staff members received in-person individual training sessions. Preintervention and 20-week postintervention patient outcomes data were collected to estimate the project's impact on incidence of fluid overload and acute kidney injury, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Preintervention and postintervention staff satisfaction surveys assessed nurses' perception of the project's value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before intervention, 24 of 37 patients (65%) met criteria of fluid overload. The project resulted in a 28% decrease in the incidence of fluid overload. Staff satisfaction surveys revealed a significant increase in nurses' feelings of empowerment to positively affect patient outcomes; all nurses agreed that the new process was efficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the project had a positive impact on patient outcomes and nurse autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"13-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2024984\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2024984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:应评估脓毒性休克患者的液体反应性,因为只有 50% 的患者对液体有反应。建议采用动态的液体反应性测量方法,如被动抬腿操作后测量脉压变化,以指导脓毒症患者在初始液体复苏后的液体管理。当地问题:该项目的目的是评估在脓毒性休克患者中采用被动抬腿和脉压变化测量方法进行护士驱动的液体反应性评估后的结果:该项目包括一家社区医院拥有 24 张病床的内外科重症监护病房的 30 名脓毒性休克成人患者。针对床旁液体反应性评估(被动抬腿后的脉压变化测量)启动了一项新的护理流程。工作人员接受了面对面的单独培训。收集了干预前和干预后 20 周的患者预后数据,以估算该项目对液体超负荷和急性肾损伤发生率、机械通气持续时间和重症监护病房住院时间的影响。干预前和干预后的员工满意度调查评估了护士对项目价值的看法:干预前,37 名患者中有 24 名(65%)符合液体超负荷标准。项目实施后,液体超负荷的发生率降低了 28%。员工满意度调查显示,护士对积极影响患者预后的授权感明显增强;所有护士都认为新流程是高效的:结果表明,该项目对患者的治疗效果和护士的自主性产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurse-Driven Fluid Responsiveness Evaluation in Patients With Septic Shock: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Background: Fluid responsiveness should be assessed in patients with septic shock because only 50% of patients are fluid responsive. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness, like pulse pressure variation measured after a passive leg raise maneuver, are recommended to guide fluid administration in patients with sepsis after initial fluid resuscitation.

Local problem: The purpose of the project was to evaluate outcomes after implementing a nurse-driven fluid responsiveness evaluation using passive leg raise and pulse pressure variation measurement in patients with septic shock.

Methods: The project included 30 adult patients with septic shock in a 24-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit at a community hospital. A new nursing process was initiated for bedside fluid responsiveness evaluation (pulse pressure variation measurement after passive leg raise). Staff members received in-person individual training sessions. Preintervention and 20-week postintervention patient outcomes data were collected to estimate the project's impact on incidence of fluid overload and acute kidney injury, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay. Preintervention and postintervention staff satisfaction surveys assessed nurses' perception of the project's value.

Results: Before intervention, 24 of 37 patients (65%) met criteria of fluid overload. The project resulted in a 28% decrease in the incidence of fluid overload. Staff satisfaction surveys revealed a significant increase in nurses' feelings of empowerment to positively affect patient outcomes; all nurses agreed that the new process was efficient.

Conclusion: The results indicate that the project had a positive impact on patient outcomes and nurse autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Assistive Communication Device Used During Pediatric Noninvasive Ventilation. Addressing Workplace Violence in Critical Care: A Call for Comprehensive Training and Support. Dental Hygienist Intervention to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in an Intensive Care Unit. Early Mobility After Cardiac Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project. Evidence-Based Approach to Appropriate Staffing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1