{"title":"眼睑切开术与上睑提肌回缩术配合可调节缝合线矫正甲状腺眼病患者的上睑下垂","authors":"Hans Olav Ueland, Kathrine Halsøy, Eyvind Rødahl","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcome, complications and surgical time of blepharotomy versus levator recession with adjustable sutures (LRWAS) for correction of upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the period 2019-2023, we performed a prospective randomized comparative study between blepharotomy and LRWAS. We examined patients, recorded time consumption, and obtained photographs preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Outcome was categorized according to Mourits and Sasim`s classification from 1999 (perfect-acceptable-unacceptable).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients (25 women) with a median (range) age of 51.5 (34-74) years at surgery were included. A significant different ( p < 0.01) median operation time was found between blepharotomy (41.5 (17-105) minutes) and LRWAS (68 (35-101) minutes). Median time from operation to last examination was 6 (6-18) months. Fifteen patients (24 eyelids) were operated with blepharotomy and 15 patients (25 eyelids) with LRWAS. Preoperative median margin reflex distance 1 was 6.5 (5-8) mm, and at final visit, median margin reflex distance 1 was 3.5 (3-4) mm after blepharotomy and 3.5 (2-5.5) mm after LRWAS. Reoperation was performed in 11 eyelids, 10 due to overcorrection and 1 because of a residual retraction. Significantly more eyelids needed reoperation after LRWAS (n = 9) compared with blepharotomy (n = 2). At final examination, a perfect or acceptable result was found in 14 (93%) patients after both procedures. Significantly shorter total duration of all visits was observed after treatment with blepharotomy (50 (35-70) minutes) compared with LRWAS (65 (40-115) minutes). Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 patient after blepharotomy, and 1 postoperative infection was observed after LRWAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate equally high success rates after blepharotomy and LRWAS for correcting upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease, but blepharotomy is less time-consuming and implies fewer reoperations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blepharotomy Versus Levator Recession With Adjustable Sutures for Correction of Upper Eyelid Retraction in Thyroid Eye Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Hans Olav Ueland, Kathrine Halsøy, Eyvind Rødahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcome, complications and surgical time of blepharotomy versus levator recession with adjustable sutures (LRWAS) for correction of upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the period 2019-2023, we performed a prospective randomized comparative study between blepharotomy and LRWAS. We examined patients, recorded time consumption, and obtained photographs preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Outcome was categorized according to Mourits and Sasim`s classification from 1999 (perfect-acceptable-unacceptable).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients (25 women) with a median (range) age of 51.5 (34-74) years at surgery were included. A significant different ( p < 0.01) median operation time was found between blepharotomy (41.5 (17-105) minutes) and LRWAS (68 (35-101) minutes). Median time from operation to last examination was 6 (6-18) months. Fifteen patients (24 eyelids) were operated with blepharotomy and 15 patients (25 eyelids) with LRWAS. Preoperative median margin reflex distance 1 was 6.5 (5-8) mm, and at final visit, median margin reflex distance 1 was 3.5 (3-4) mm after blepharotomy and 3.5 (2-5.5) mm after LRWAS. Reoperation was performed in 11 eyelids, 10 due to overcorrection and 1 because of a residual retraction. Significantly more eyelids needed reoperation after LRWAS (n = 9) compared with blepharotomy (n = 2). At final examination, a perfect or acceptable result was found in 14 (93%) patients after both procedures. Significantly shorter total duration of all visits was observed after treatment with blepharotomy (50 (35-70) minutes) compared with LRWAS (65 (40-115) minutes). Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 patient after blepharotomy, and 1 postoperative infection was observed after LRWAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate equally high success rates after blepharotomy and LRWAS for correcting upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease, but blepharotomy is less time-consuming and implies fewer reoperations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Blepharotomy Versus Levator Recession With Adjustable Sutures for Correction of Upper Eyelid Retraction in Thyroid Eye Disease.
Purpose: To compare outcome, complications and surgical time of blepharotomy versus levator recession with adjustable sutures (LRWAS) for correction of upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease.
Methods: In the period 2019-2023, we performed a prospective randomized comparative study between blepharotomy and LRWAS. We examined patients, recorded time consumption, and obtained photographs preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Outcome was categorized according to Mourits and Sasim`s classification from 1999 (perfect-acceptable-unacceptable).
Results: A total of 30 patients (25 women) with a median (range) age of 51.5 (34-74) years at surgery were included. A significant different ( p < 0.01) median operation time was found between blepharotomy (41.5 (17-105) minutes) and LRWAS (68 (35-101) minutes). Median time from operation to last examination was 6 (6-18) months. Fifteen patients (24 eyelids) were operated with blepharotomy and 15 patients (25 eyelids) with LRWAS. Preoperative median margin reflex distance 1 was 6.5 (5-8) mm, and at final visit, median margin reflex distance 1 was 3.5 (3-4) mm after blepharotomy and 3.5 (2-5.5) mm after LRWAS. Reoperation was performed in 11 eyelids, 10 due to overcorrection and 1 because of a residual retraction. Significantly more eyelids needed reoperation after LRWAS (n = 9) compared with blepharotomy (n = 2). At final examination, a perfect or acceptable result was found in 14 (93%) patients after both procedures. Significantly shorter total duration of all visits was observed after treatment with blepharotomy (50 (35-70) minutes) compared with LRWAS (65 (40-115) minutes). Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 patient after blepharotomy, and 1 postoperative infection was observed after LRWAS.
Conclusion: We demonstrate equally high success rates after blepharotomy and LRWAS for correcting upper eyelid retraction in thyroid eye disease, but blepharotomy is less time-consuming and implies fewer reoperations.
期刊介绍：
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
