GIST 患者的转诊模式:一项全国性研究的数据。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Acta Oncologica Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2024.23722
Evelyne Roets, Nikki S Ijzerman, Vincent K Y Ho, Ingrid M E Desar, Anna K L Reyners, Hans Gelderblom, Dirk J Grünhagen, Boudewijn Van Etten, Winan J Van Houdt, Winette T A Van der Graaf, Neeltje Steeghs
{"title":"GIST 患者的转诊模式:一项全国性研究的数据。","authors":"Evelyne Roets, Nikki S Ijzerman, Vincent K Y Ho, Ingrid M E Desar, Anna K L Reyners, Hans Gelderblom, Dirk J Grünhagen, Boudewijn Van Etten, Winan J Van Houdt, Winette T A Van der Graaf, Neeltje Steeghs","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.23722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"63 ","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Referral patterns of GIST patients: data from a nationwide study.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyne Roets, Nikki S Ijzerman, Vincent K Y Ho, Ingrid M E Desar, Anna K L Reyners, Hans Gelderblom, Dirk J Grünhagen, Boudewijn Van Etten, Winan J Van Houdt, Winette T A Van der Graaf, Neeltje Steeghs\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2024.23722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"28-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.23722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.23722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究比较了在荷兰参考中心和非参考中心接受治疗的胃肠间质瘤(GIST)患者的特征、转诊和治疗模式以及总生存率(OS):本研究比较了在荷兰参考中心和非参考中心接受治疗的胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的特征、转诊和治疗模式以及总生存率(OS):这项回顾性队列研究利用荷兰癌症登记处和荷兰全国病理数据库的数据,对2016年至2019年期间确诊的患者进行研究。患者分为两组:在参考中心确诊或转诊的患者,以及在非参考中心确诊但未转诊的患者:这项研究共纳入1550名GIST患者,参考中心患者的中位年龄为67.0岁,非参考中心患者的中位年龄为68.0岁。87%的患者在非参考中心确诊,其中36.5%(493/1,352)转诊至参考中心。高危患者(62.2% [74/119])和转移性患者(67.2% [90/134])的转诊率较高。参比中心和非参比中心分别有 96.9% 和 87.6% 的病例进行了突变分析(P < 0.01)。在参考中心和非参考中心,分别有89.5%和82.0%(P < 0.01)的高危患者和94.1%和65.9%(P < 0.01)的转移性患者接受了全身治疗。阳性切除边缘和肿瘤破裂的比例在参照中心和非参照中心之间没有差异。中位OS未达到:结论:非参照中心的大量转移性 GIST 患者没有接受系统治疗。结论:非参照中心的大量转移性 GIST 患者没有接受系统治疗,这可能有合理的原因。然而,优化荷兰GIST患者的转诊策略可使患者受益。需要进一步开展研究,探讨转移性 GIST 患者未开始系统治疗的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Referral patterns of GIST patients: data from a nationwide study.

Background: This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral.

Results: This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached.

Conclusion: A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
期刊最新文献
Patient reported experiences of health care, quality of life and preoperative information in colon cancer. Survival outcomes for HER2-low breast cancer: Danish national data. The risk of venous thromboembolism in adult patients with diffuse glioma: a nationwide population-based study. NIVO-TIL: combination anti-PD-1 therapy and adoptive T-cell transfer in untreated metastatic melanoma: an exploratory open-label phase I trial. The impact of age on clinicopathological features and treatment results in patients with localised prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1