WBIS/-M 在肥胖前代表性样本中的心理计量特性--改进版 10 个项目的证据。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1159/000537689
Simon Schraven, Claudia Hübner, Janina Eichler, Thomas Mansfeld, Johannes Sander, Florian Seyfried, Stefan Kaiser, Arne Dietrich, Ricarda Schmidt, Anja Hilbert
{"title":"WBIS/-M 在肥胖前代表性样本中的心理计量特性--改进版 10 个项目的证据。","authors":"Simon Schraven, Claudia Hübner, Janina Eichler, Thomas Mansfeld, Johannes Sander, Florian Seyfried, Stefan Kaiser, Arne Dietrich, Ricarda Schmidt, Anja Hilbert","doi":"10.1159/000537689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Weight Bias Internalization Scale and the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale are well-established self-report questionnaires for assessing weight bias internalization, which is widespread among bariatric patients. However, among this group, psychometric properties of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale have only been examined in small samples showing unsatisfactory model fit and have not been explored for the modified questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study psychometrically evaluated and compared the Weight Bias Internalization Scale and Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in a large sample of prebariatric patients (N = 825, mean age = 46.75 years, SD = 11.55) regarding item characteristics, model fit to unidimensionality, reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item 4 of both questionnaires showed low corrected item-total correlations (&lt;0.40) and was therefore removed from the scales. The new 10-item versions showed improved item characteristics, internal consistency, model fit to unidimensionality, and convergent and divergent validity when compared to the 11-item versions. The best psychometric properties were found for the 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale surpasses the other versions studied in all psychometric properties. Therefore, it should be used in prebariatric patients to detect weight bias internalization and provide them with psychological interventions that could improve bariatric surgery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"329-337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the WBIS/M in a Representative Prebariatric Sample: Evidence for an Improved 10-Item Version.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Schraven, Claudia Hübner, Janina Eichler, Thomas Mansfeld, Johannes Sander, Florian Seyfried, Stefan Kaiser, Arne Dietrich, Ricarda Schmidt, Anja Hilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000537689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Weight Bias Internalization Scale and the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale are well-established self-report questionnaires for assessing weight bias internalization, which is widespread among bariatric patients. However, among this group, psychometric properties of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale have only been examined in small samples showing unsatisfactory model fit and have not been explored for the modified questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study psychometrically evaluated and compared the Weight Bias Internalization Scale and Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in a large sample of prebariatric patients (N = 825, mean age = 46.75 years, SD = 11.55) regarding item characteristics, model fit to unidimensionality, reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item 4 of both questionnaires showed low corrected item-total correlations (&lt;0.40) and was therefore removed from the scales. The new 10-item versions showed improved item characteristics, internal consistency, model fit to unidimensionality, and convergent and divergent validity when compared to the 11-item versions. The best psychometric properties were found for the 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale surpasses the other versions studied in all psychometric properties. Therefore, it should be used in prebariatric patients to detect weight bias internalization and provide them with psychological interventions that could improve bariatric surgery outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"329-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Facts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:体重偏差内化量表和修正体重偏差内化量表是评估体重偏差内化的成熟自我报告问卷,在减肥患者中广泛使用。然而,在这一群体中,体重偏差内化量表的心理测量特性仅在小样本中进行过研究,结果显示模型拟合效果并不理想,而且尚未对修改后的问卷进行探讨。方法 本研究在减肥前患者的大样本(样本数=825,平均年龄=46.75岁,SD=11.55)中,就项目特征、单维度模型拟合、信度、建构效度和测量不变性等方面,对体重偏差内化量表和修订版体重偏差内化量表进行了心理计量学评估和比较。结果 两份问卷的项目 4 均显示出较低的校正项目-总相关性 (
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of the WBIS/M in a Representative Prebariatric Sample: Evidence for an Improved 10-Item Version.

Introduction: The Weight Bias Internalization Scale and the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale are well-established self-report questionnaires for assessing weight bias internalization, which is widespread among bariatric patients. However, among this group, psychometric properties of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale have only been examined in small samples showing unsatisfactory model fit and have not been explored for the modified questionnaire.

Methods: This study psychometrically evaluated and compared the Weight Bias Internalization Scale and Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in a large sample of prebariatric patients (N = 825, mean age = 46.75 years, SD = 11.55) regarding item characteristics, model fit to unidimensionality, reliability, construct validity, and measurement invariance.

Results: Item 4 of both questionnaires showed low corrected item-total correlations (<0.40) and was therefore removed from the scales. The new 10-item versions showed improved item characteristics, internal consistency, model fit to unidimensionality, and convergent and divergent validity when compared to the 11-item versions. The best psychometric properties were found for the 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale.

Conclusion: The 10-item version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale surpasses the other versions studied in all psychometric properties. Therefore, it should be used in prebariatric patients to detect weight bias internalization and provide them with psychological interventions that could improve bariatric surgery outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
The One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is a suitable alternative to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 : a propensity-score matched analysis. Omentin increases glucose uptake, but not insulin sensitivity in human myotubes dependent on extracellular lactotransferrin. Burden of disease and cost of illness of overweight and obesity in Portugal. European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) Position Statement on Medical Nutrition Therapy for the Management of Individuals with Overweight or Obesity and Cancer. Association between Obesity and Dental Caries in Adults: An Analysis of WHR, and DMFT Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1