护士对工作关怀的看法:混合方法研究,定量报告。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000001400
Jennifer Drake, Theresa M Davis, Anne-Marie O'Brien, Carla Parker, Carol Swamidoss Douglas, Donna Thomas, Sarah Rickard, Maureen E Sintich, Audra Gollenberg, Bernice D Mowery
{"title":"护士对工作关怀的看法:混合方法研究,定量报告。","authors":"Jennifer Drake, Theresa M Davis, Anne-Marie O'Brien, Carla Parker, Carol Swamidoss Douglas, Donna Thomas, Sarah Rickard, Maureen E Sintich, Audra Gollenberg, Bernice D Mowery","doi":"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Study objectives were to explore nurses' perceptions of self-care, co-worker, and leader caring within healthcare work environments and assess reliability of 3 Watson Caritas Scores.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing caring in an organization where Watson's Theory of Human Caring guides nursing practice offers insight into the professional practice environment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study reports quantitative data from mixed-methods descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 1307 RNs at a large healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores were self = 5.46, co-worker = 5.39, and leader score = 5.53, and median scores were >5.6 (range, 1-7). All scales had a positive and significant correlation to likelihood to recommend the organization, with the largest being feeling cared for by leaders. Internal reliability of the 3 scales was ≥0.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse perceptions of caring may influence the organization's reputation. Assessing the perception of caring among nursing staff after the introduction and enculturation of this framework is needed. Results support psychometric value for 3 Watson Caritas Scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Perceptions of Caring at Work: Mixed-Methods Study, Quantitative Report.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Drake, Theresa M Davis, Anne-Marie O'Brien, Carla Parker, Carol Swamidoss Douglas, Donna Thomas, Sarah Rickard, Maureen E Sintich, Audra Gollenberg, Bernice D Mowery\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNA.0000000000001400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Study objectives were to explore nurses' perceptions of self-care, co-worker, and leader caring within healthcare work environments and assess reliability of 3 Watson Caritas Scores.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing caring in an organization where Watson's Theory of Human Caring guides nursing practice offers insight into the professional practice environment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study reports quantitative data from mixed-methods descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 1307 RNs at a large healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores were self = 5.46, co-worker = 5.39, and leader score = 5.53, and median scores were >5.6 (range, 1-7). All scales had a positive and significant correlation to likelihood to recommend the organization, with the largest being feeling cared for by leaders. Internal reliability of the 3 scales was ≥0.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse perceptions of caring may influence the organization's reputation. Assessing the perception of caring among nursing staff after the introduction and enculturation of this framework is needed. Results support psychometric value for 3 Watson Caritas Scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Administration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001400\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Administration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究目的:探讨护士在医疗保健工作环境中对自我护理、同事和领导关怀的看法,并评估3项沃森关怀评分的可靠性:背景:在以沃森人类关怀理论指导护理实践的组织中,对关怀进行评估有助于深入了解专业实践环境:本研究采用混合方法对一家大型医疗保健系统的 1307 名护士进行了横断面描述性调查,并报告了定量数据:平均分:自我=5.46,同事=5.39,领导=5.53,中位数大于 5.6(范围 1-7)。所有量表均与推荐组织的可能性呈显著正相关,其中最大的相关是感受到领导的关怀。三个量表的内部信度均≥0.9:护士对关怀的感知可能会影响组织的声誉。有必要在引入该框架并使之文化化后,对护理人员的关怀感进行评估。结果支持 3 个 Watson Caritas 分数的心理测量价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses' Perceptions of Caring at Work: Mixed-Methods Study, Quantitative Report.

Objectives: Study objectives were to explore nurses' perceptions of self-care, co-worker, and leader caring within healthcare work environments and assess reliability of 3 Watson Caritas Scores.

Background: Assessing caring in an organization where Watson's Theory of Human Caring guides nursing practice offers insight into the professional practice environment.

Method: This study reports quantitative data from mixed-methods descriptive, cross-sectional survey of 1307 RNs at a large healthcare system.

Results: Mean scores were self = 5.46, co-worker = 5.39, and leader score = 5.53, and median scores were >5.6 (range, 1-7). All scales had a positive and significant correlation to likelihood to recommend the organization, with the largest being feeling cared for by leaders. Internal reliability of the 3 scales was ≥0.9.

Conclusion: Nurse perceptions of caring may influence the organization's reputation. Assessing the perception of caring among nursing staff after the introduction and enculturation of this framework is needed. Results support psychometric value for 3 Watson Caritas Scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​JONA™ is the authoritative source of information on developments and advances in patient care leadership. Content is geared to nurse executives, directors of nursing, and nurse managers in hospital, community health, and ambulatory care environments. Practical, innovative, and solution-oriented articles provide the tools and data needed to excel in executive practice in changing healthcare systems: leadership development; human, material, and financial resource management and relationships; systems, business, and financial strategies. All articles are peer-reviewed, selected and developed with the guidance of a distinguished group of editorial advisors.
期刊最新文献
National Incidence of Nurse Suicide and Associated Features. Exploring Reasons for Satisfaction with Job Assignments Among Travel Nurses. Institution-Wide Moral Distress Among Nurses. Measuring Professional Governance: The Swedish Version of the Verran Professional Governance Scale©. Advanced Practice Nurse-Led Research: Challenges and Approaches to Digital Health Programs' Evaluation Using Big Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1