{"title":"青春期早期接触私人屏幕可预测男孩和女孩高中毕业时的学业和社交障碍。","authors":"Benoit Gauthier, Linda S Pagani","doi":"10.24095/hpcdp.44.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth media guidelines in Canada and the United States recommend that bedrooms should remain screen-free zones. This study aims to verify whether bedroom screens at age 12 years prospectively predict academic and social impairment by age 17 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort (661 girls and 686 boys). Linear regression analyses estimated associations between having a bedroom screen (television or computer) at age 12 years and selfreported overall grades, dropout risk, prosocial behaviour and likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship in the past 12 months at age 17 years, while adjusting for potential individual and family confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both girls and boys, bedroom screens at age 12 years predicted lower overall grades (B = -2.41, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -1.61, p ≤ 0.05 for girls), higher dropout risk (B = 0.16, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; 0.17, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) and lower likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship (B = -0.13, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -0.18, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) at age 17. Bedroom screens also predicted lower levels of prosocial behaviour (B = -0.52, p ≤ 0.001) at age 17 years for boys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bedroom as an early adolescent screen-based zone does not predict long-term positive health and well-being. Pediatric recommendations to parents and youth should be more resolute about bedrooms being screen-free zones and about unlimited access in private exposures in childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":51316,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice","volume":"44 2","pages":"39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private screen access in early adolescence predicts subsequent academic and social impairment at the end of high school for boys and girls.\",\"authors\":\"Benoit Gauthier, Linda S Pagani\",\"doi\":\"10.24095/hpcdp.44.2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Youth media guidelines in Canada and the United States recommend that bedrooms should remain screen-free zones. This study aims to verify whether bedroom screens at age 12 years prospectively predict academic and social impairment by age 17 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort (661 girls and 686 boys). Linear regression analyses estimated associations between having a bedroom screen (television or computer) at age 12 years and selfreported overall grades, dropout risk, prosocial behaviour and likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship in the past 12 months at age 17 years, while adjusting for potential individual and family confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both girls and boys, bedroom screens at age 12 years predicted lower overall grades (B = -2.41, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -1.61, p ≤ 0.05 for girls), higher dropout risk (B = 0.16, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; 0.17, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) and lower likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship (B = -0.13, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -0.18, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) at age 17. Bedroom screens also predicted lower levels of prosocial behaviour (B = -0.52, p ≤ 0.001) at age 17 years for boys.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bedroom as an early adolescent screen-based zone does not predict long-term positive health and well-being. Pediatric recommendations to parents and youth should be more resolute about bedrooms being screen-free zones and about unlimited access in private exposures in childhood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"39-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11013024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.44.2.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada-Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.44.2.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:加拿大和美国的青少年媒体指南建议,卧室应该是无屏幕区。本研究旨在验证 12 岁时卧室中的屏幕是否能预测 17 岁时的学业和社交障碍:参与者来自魁北克儿童发展纵向研究出生队列(661 名女孩和 686 名男孩)。线性回归分析估计了12岁时拥有卧室屏幕(电视或电脑)与17岁时自我报告的总成绩、辍学风险、亲社会行为和过去12个月中经历过约会关系的可能性之间的关联,同时对潜在的个人和家庭混杂因素进行了调整:对于男孩和女孩来说,12 岁时的卧室屏幕预示着他们在 17 岁时的总成绩较低(B = -2.41,男孩 p ≤ 0.001;女孩 -1.61,女孩 p ≤ 0.05)、辍学风险较高(B = 0.16,男孩 p ≤ 0.001;女孩 0.17,女孩 p ≤ 0.001)以及经历过约会关系的可能性较低(B = -0.13,男孩 p ≤ 0.001;女孩 -0.18,女孩 p ≤ 0.001)。卧室屏幕还预示着男孩在 17 岁时的亲社会行为水平较低(B = -0.52,p ≤ 0.001):结论:卧室作为青少年早期的屏幕区,并不能预测长期的积极健康和幸福。儿科向家长和青少年提出的建议应更坚决地将卧室作为无屏幕区,并在儿童时期无限制地接触私人屏幕。
Private screen access in early adolescence predicts subsequent academic and social impairment at the end of high school for boys and girls.
Introduction: Youth media guidelines in Canada and the United States recommend that bedrooms should remain screen-free zones. This study aims to verify whether bedroom screens at age 12 years prospectively predict academic and social impairment by age 17 years.
Methods: Participants were from the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort (661 girls and 686 boys). Linear regression analyses estimated associations between having a bedroom screen (television or computer) at age 12 years and selfreported overall grades, dropout risk, prosocial behaviour and likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship in the past 12 months at age 17 years, while adjusting for potential individual and family confounding factors.
Results: For both girls and boys, bedroom screens at age 12 years predicted lower overall grades (B = -2.41, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -1.61, p ≤ 0.05 for girls), higher dropout risk (B = 0.16, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; 0.17, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) and lower likelihood of having experienced a dating relationship (B = -0.13, p ≤ 0.001 for boys; -0.18, p ≤ 0.001 for girls) at age 17. Bedroom screens also predicted lower levels of prosocial behaviour (B = -0.52, p ≤ 0.001) at age 17 years for boys.
Conclusion: The bedroom as an early adolescent screen-based zone does not predict long-term positive health and well-being. Pediatric recommendations to parents and youth should be more resolute about bedrooms being screen-free zones and about unlimited access in private exposures in childhood.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada: Research, Policy and Practice (the HPCDP Journal) is the monthly, online scientific journal of the Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The journal publishes articles on disease prevention, health promotion and health equity in the areas of chronic diseases, injuries and life course health. Content includes research from fields such as public/community health, epidemiology, biostatistics, the behavioural and social sciences, and health services or economics.