肩袖相关疼痛患者的疼痛与本体感觉之间的关系。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.007
Amanda L. Ager PhD (candidate), PT , Jean-Sébastien Roy PT, PhD , Marc-Olivier Dubé PT, PhD , Ann M. Cools PT, PhD , Dorien Borms PT, PhD
{"title":"肩袖相关疼痛患者的疼痛与本体感觉之间的关系。","authors":"Amanda L. Ager PhD (candidate), PT ,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Roy PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Marc-Olivier Dubé PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Ann M. Cools PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Dorien Borms PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) have altered proprioception. The relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception is not well understood.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional comparative study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two participants with RCRSP (mean age 27.6 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 4.8 years) and 22 matched pain-free participants (23.4 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.5 years) performed two upper limb active joint position sense tests: (1) the Upper Limb Proprioception Reaching Test (PRO-Reach; reaching toward seven targets) in centimeters and (2) Biodex System at 90% of maximum internal rotation in degrees. Participants performed three memorization and three reproduction trials blindfolded. The proprioception error (PE) is the difference between the memorized and estimation trials. Pain levels were captured pre- and post-evaluation (11-point Likert Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Relationships between PE and pain were investigated using independent <em>t-</em>tests and Spearman rank correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 22.7% RCRSP participants indicated an increase in pain following the PRO-Reach (X̅ increase of 1.4 ± 1.5 points), while 59% did so with the Biodex (X̅ increase of 2.3 ± 1.8 points), reflecting a clinically important increase in pain. Weak-to-moderate correlations between pain and PEs were found with the Biodex (<em>r</em> = 0.39-0.53) and weak correlations with the PRO-Reach (<em>r</em> = −0.26 to 0.38). Concerning PEs, no significant differences were found between groups with the Biodex (<em>p</em> = 0.32, effect size <em>d</em> = −0.31 [−0.90 to 0.29]). The RCRSP participants demonstrated lower PEs with the PRO-Reach in elevation compared to pain-free participants (global X̅ = 4.6 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 1.2 cm vs 5.5 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 1.5 cm; superior 3.8 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.1 cm vs 5.7 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.9 cm; superior-lateral nondominant targets 4.3 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.2 cm vs 6.1 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.8 cm; <em>p</em> = 0.02-0.05, effect size <em>d</em> = 0.72-0.74 [0.12-1.3]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Individuals with RCRSP demonstrated better upper limb proprioception in elevation, suggesting a change to interoception (sensory reweighting) in the presence of pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between pain and proprioception among individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain\",\"authors\":\"Amanda L. Ager PhD (candidate), PT ,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Roy PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Marc-Olivier Dubé PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Ann M. Cools PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Dorien Borms PT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2023.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) have altered proprioception. The relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception is not well understood.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional comparative study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-two participants with RCRSP (mean age 27.6 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 4.8 years) and 22 matched pain-free participants (23.4 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.5 years) performed two upper limb active joint position sense tests: (1) the Upper Limb Proprioception Reaching Test (PRO-Reach; reaching toward seven targets) in centimeters and (2) Biodex System at 90% of maximum internal rotation in degrees. Participants performed three memorization and three reproduction trials blindfolded. The proprioception error (PE) is the difference between the memorized and estimation trials. Pain levels were captured pre- and post-evaluation (11-point Likert Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Relationships between PE and pain were investigated using independent <em>t-</em>tests and Spearman rank correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 22.7% RCRSP participants indicated an increase in pain following the PRO-Reach (X̅ increase of 1.4 ± 1.5 points), while 59% did so with the Biodex (X̅ increase of 2.3 ± 1.8 points), reflecting a clinically important increase in pain. Weak-to-moderate correlations between pain and PEs were found with the Biodex (<em>r</em> = 0.39-0.53) and weak correlations with the PRO-Reach (<em>r</em> = −0.26 to 0.38). Concerning PEs, no significant differences were found between groups with the Biodex (<em>p</em> = 0.32, effect size <em>d</em> = −0.31 [−0.90 to 0.29]). The RCRSP participants demonstrated lower PEs with the PRO-Reach in elevation compared to pain-free participants (global X̅ = 4.6 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 1.2 cm vs 5.5 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 1.5 cm; superior 3.8 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.1 cm vs 5.7 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.9 cm; superior-lateral nondominant targets 4.3 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.2 cm vs 6.1 <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span> 2.8 cm; <em>p</em> = 0.02-0.05, effect size <em>d</em> = 0.72-0.74 [0.12-1.3]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Individuals with RCRSP demonstrated better upper limb proprioception in elevation, suggesting a change to interoception (sensory reweighting) in the presence of pain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001680\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113023001680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩袖相关性肩痛(RCRSP)患者的本体感觉会发生改变。目的:本研究旨在调查肩痛与本体感觉之间的关系:研究设计:这是一项横断面比较研究:22名患有RCRSP的参与者(平均年龄为27.6 ± 4.8岁)和22名匹配的无痛参与者(23.4 ± 2.5岁)进行了两项上肢主动关节位置感测试:(1)上肢本体感觉伸展测试(PRO-Reach;伸向7个目标),单位为厘米;(2)Biodex系统最大内旋90%,单位为度。参与者在蒙眼的情况下进行了三次记忆和三次再现试验。本体感觉误差 (PE) 是记忆试验和估计试验之间的差值。评估前后的疼痛程度均有记录(11 点 Likert 数字疼痛评分量表)。采用独立 t 检验和斯皮尔曼等级相关性研究了 PE 与疼痛之间的关系:总体而言,22.7% 的 RCRSP 参与者在进行 PRO-Reach 后表示疼痛加剧(X̅ 增加了 1.4 ± 1.5 分),而 59% 的 Biodex 参与者表示疼痛加剧(X̅ 增加了 2.3 ± 1.8 分),这反映了临床上重要的疼痛加剧。在 Biodex(r = 0.39-0.53)和 PRO-Reach (r = -0.26 至 0.38)中,疼痛和 PE 之间存在弱到中等程度的相关性。在 PE 方面,Biodex 没有发现组间存在显著差异(p = 0.32,效应大小 d = -0.31 [-0.90 至 0.29])。与无痛患者相比,RCRSP 患者使用 PRO-Reach 抬高时的 PE 值较低(整体 X̅ = 4.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 5.5 ± 1.5 cm;上部 3.8 ± 2.1 cm vs 5.7 ± 2.9 cm;上外侧非支配目标 4.3 ± 2.2 cm vs 6.1 ± 2.8 cm;p = 0.02-0.05,效应大小 d = 0.72-0.74 [0.12-1.3]):结论:RCRSP 患者在抬高时上肢本体感觉较好,这表明在疼痛的情况下,他们的本体感觉会发生变化(感觉重新加权)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between pain and proprioception among individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain

Background

Individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) have altered proprioception. The relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception is not well understood.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between shoulder pain and proprioception.

Study design

This was a cross-sectional comparative study.

Methods

Twenty-two participants with RCRSP (mean age 27.6 ± 4.8 years) and 22 matched pain-free participants (23.4 ± 2.5 years) performed two upper limb active joint position sense tests: (1) the Upper Limb Proprioception Reaching Test (PRO-Reach; reaching toward seven targets) in centimeters and (2) Biodex System at 90% of maximum internal rotation in degrees. Participants performed three memorization and three reproduction trials blindfolded. The proprioception error (PE) is the difference between the memorized and estimation trials. Pain levels were captured pre- and post-evaluation (11-point Likert Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Relationships between PE and pain were investigated using independent t-tests and Spearman rank correlations.

Results

Overall, 22.7% RCRSP participants indicated an increase in pain following the PRO-Reach (X̅ increase of 1.4 ± 1.5 points), while 59% did so with the Biodex (X̅ increase of 2.3 ± 1.8 points), reflecting a clinically important increase in pain. Weak-to-moderate correlations between pain and PEs were found with the Biodex (r = 0.39-0.53) and weak correlations with the PRO-Reach (r = −0.26 to 0.38). Concerning PEs, no significant differences were found between groups with the Biodex (p = 0.32, effect size d = −0.31 [−0.90 to 0.29]). The RCRSP participants demonstrated lower PEs with the PRO-Reach in elevation compared to pain-free participants (global X̅ = 4.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 5.5 ± 1.5 cm; superior 3.8 ± 2.1 cm vs 5.7 ± 2.9 cm; superior-lateral nondominant targets 4.3 ± 2.2 cm vs 6.1 ± 2.8 cm; p = 0.02-0.05, effect size d = 0.72-0.74 [0.12-1.3]).

Conclusions

Individuals with RCRSP demonstrated better upper limb proprioception in elevation, suggesting a change to interoception (sensory reweighting) in the presence of pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model. Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1