社交媒体会继续存在吗?调查结果显示病理学家对社交媒体的兴趣和参与度与日俱增。

Raul S Gonzalez, Elizabeth L McKinnon, Maren Y Fuller, Jerad M Gardner, Wei Chen, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang
{"title":"社交媒体会继续存在吗?调查结果显示病理学家对社交媒体的兴趣和参与度与日俱增。","authors":"Raul S Gonzalez, Elizabeth L McKinnon, Maren Y Fuller, Jerad M Gardner, Wei Chen, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0387-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Social media has become widely adopted by pathologists and other physicians for professional purposes. While engagement has likely increased over time, there remain few concrete data regarding attitudes toward its use.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess pathologists' use of and attitudes toward social media over time.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We created a survey regarding personal and professional use of social media and circulated it via multiple channels in December 2017 and again in February 2022. Results of the 2 surveys were compared for statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The 2017 survey was completed by 97 participants, and the 2022 survey by 305 participants. Respondents were predominantly female and academics, included pathologists in all age categories and all time-in-practice length. In both surveys, Twitter (now X) was the most popular platform for professional use and Facebook was the most popular for personal use. Professional barriers to social media use remained consistent between the 2 surveys, including the amount of time required. Education was seen as the main benefit of social media use in both surveys, while other benefits such as networking and increasing professional visibility were endorsed significantly less often in the second survey. While the second survey received more than 3 times as many responses as the first, several aspects of social media use (mainly demographics) remained similar during the timeframe, while other aspects (such as usage and perceived values) decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Pathologists continue to find social media valuable. Barriers remain, though overall pathologists of all ages and practice settings appear receptive to using social media to further educational and other opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1159-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Social Media Here to Stay?: Survey Results Indicate Increasing Pathologist Interest and Engagement Over Time.\",\"authors\":\"Raul S Gonzalez, Elizabeth L McKinnon, Maren Y Fuller, Jerad M Gardner, Wei Chen, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2023-0387-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Social media has become widely adopted by pathologists and other physicians for professional purposes. While engagement has likely increased over time, there remain few concrete data regarding attitudes toward its use.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess pathologists' use of and attitudes toward social media over time.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>We created a survey regarding personal and professional use of social media and circulated it via multiple channels in December 2017 and again in February 2022. Results of the 2 surveys were compared for statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The 2017 survey was completed by 97 participants, and the 2022 survey by 305 participants. Respondents were predominantly female and academics, included pathologists in all age categories and all time-in-practice length. In both surveys, Twitter (now X) was the most popular platform for professional use and Facebook was the most popular for personal use. Professional barriers to social media use remained consistent between the 2 surveys, including the amount of time required. Education was seen as the main benefit of social media use in both surveys, while other benefits such as networking and increasing professional visibility were endorsed significantly less often in the second survey. While the second survey received more than 3 times as many responses as the first, several aspects of social media use (mainly demographics) remained similar during the timeframe, while other aspects (such as usage and perceived values) decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Pathologists continue to find social media valuable. Barriers remain, though overall pathologists of all ages and practice settings appear receptive to using social media to further educational and other opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1159-1165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0387-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0387-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景病理学家和其他医生出于专业目的广泛使用社交媒体。虽然随着时间的推移,参与度可能会有所提高,但有关其使用态度的具体数据仍然很少:评估病理学家随着时间推移对社交媒体的使用情况和态度:我们制作了一份关于社交媒体的个人和专业使用情况的调查表,并于 2017 年 12 月和 2022 年 2 月通过多种渠道分发。我们对两次调查的结果进行了比较,以发现统计学上的显著差异:有 97 人完成了 2017 年的调查,305 人完成了 2022 年的调查。受访者以女性和学者为主,包括所有年龄段和执业时间长短的病理学家。在两次调查中,Twitter(现为 X)是最受欢迎的专业使用平台,而 Facebook 则是最受欢迎的个人使用平台。在两次调查中,使用社交媒体的专业障碍保持一致,包括所需的时间。在两次调查中,教育都被视为使用社交媒体的主要益处,而在第二次调查中,网络和提高专业知名度等其他益处被认可的次数明显较少。虽然第二次调查收到的回复是第一次调查的三倍多,但在这段时间内,社交媒体使用的几个方面(主要是人口统计学)保持相似,而其他方面(如使用率和认知价值)则有所下降:病理学家仍然认为社交媒体很有价值。病理学家仍然认为社交媒体很有价值,但障碍依然存在,不过总体而言,所有年龄段和执业环境的病理学家似乎都乐于使用社交媒体来促进教育和其他机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Social Media Here to Stay?: Survey Results Indicate Increasing Pathologist Interest and Engagement Over Time.

Context.—: Social media has become widely adopted by pathologists and other physicians for professional purposes. While engagement has likely increased over time, there remain few concrete data regarding attitudes toward its use.

Objective.—: To assess pathologists' use of and attitudes toward social media over time.

Design.—: We created a survey regarding personal and professional use of social media and circulated it via multiple channels in December 2017 and again in February 2022. Results of the 2 surveys were compared for statistically significant differences.

Results.—: The 2017 survey was completed by 97 participants, and the 2022 survey by 305 participants. Respondents were predominantly female and academics, included pathologists in all age categories and all time-in-practice length. In both surveys, Twitter (now X) was the most popular platform for professional use and Facebook was the most popular for personal use. Professional barriers to social media use remained consistent between the 2 surveys, including the amount of time required. Education was seen as the main benefit of social media use in both surveys, while other benefits such as networking and increasing professional visibility were endorsed significantly less often in the second survey. While the second survey received more than 3 times as many responses as the first, several aspects of social media use (mainly demographics) remained similar during the timeframe, while other aspects (such as usage and perceived values) decreased.

Conclusions.—: Pathologists continue to find social media valuable. Barriers remain, though overall pathologists of all ages and practice settings appear receptive to using social media to further educational and other opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laboratorian Interpretation of Drug Testing Results in Pain Management: Lessons From College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing. Clot Waveform Analysis: From Hypercoagulability to Hypocoagulability: A Review. Digital Pathology in the Detection of Infectious Microorganisms: An Evaluation of Its Strengths and Weaknesses Across a Panel of Immunohistochemical and Histochemical Stains Routinely Used in Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma Prediction From Whole Slide Images. Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma With Predominant Tubulocystic Features Mimics Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1