美国儿科麻醉奖学金项目中的护理点超声波培训状况:调查评估。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1111/pan.14851
Elizabeth M O'Brien, Rodrigo Daly Guris, William Quarshie, Elaina E Lin
{"title":"美国儿科麻醉奖学金项目中的护理点超声波培训状况:调查评估。","authors":"Elizabeth M O'Brien, Rodrigo Daly Guris, William Quarshie, Elaina E Lin","doi":"10.1111/pan.14851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound is an invaluable bedside tool for anesthesiologists and has been integrated into anesthesiology residency training and board certification in the United States. Little is known about point-of-care ultrasound training practices in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the current state of point-of-care ultrasound education in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey study distributed to 60 American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs. Two programs were in their initial accreditation period and were excluded due to lack of historical data. Program directors or associate program directors were invited to complete this 23-item survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three of fifty-eight programs (57%) completed the survey. Of those, 15 programs (45%) reported having a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. Programs with ≤3 fellows per year were less likely to have an ultrasound curriculum compared to programs with ≥4 fellows per year (30% programs 0-3 fellows/year vs. 69% programs ≥4 fellows/year, odds ratio 0.19 [95% confidence intervals 0.04-0.87]; p = .03). Program directors and associate program directors rated point-of-care ultrasound training as highly valuable to fellows' education. Barriers to use most commonly included lack of experience (64%), lack of oversight/interpretive guidance (58%), and lack of time (45%). Programs without point-of-care ultrasound training had significantly higher odds of listing lack of ultrasound access as a primary barrier (50% programs without vs. 13% programs with, odds ratio 6.5, [95% confidence intervals 1.3-50]; p = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observational survey-based study suggests that fewer than half of pediatric anesthesia training programs in the United States offer point-of-care ultrasound education. Additional research is needed to optimize this education and training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The state of point-of-care ultrasound training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States: A survey assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M O'Brien, Rodrigo Daly Guris, William Quarshie, Elaina E Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.14851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound is an invaluable bedside tool for anesthesiologists and has been integrated into anesthesiology residency training and board certification in the United States. Little is known about point-of-care ultrasound training practices in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the current state of point-of-care ultrasound education in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey study distributed to 60 American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs. Two programs were in their initial accreditation period and were excluded due to lack of historical data. Program directors or associate program directors were invited to complete this 23-item survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three of fifty-eight programs (57%) completed the survey. Of those, 15 programs (45%) reported having a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. Programs with ≤3 fellows per year were less likely to have an ultrasound curriculum compared to programs with ≥4 fellows per year (30% programs 0-3 fellows/year vs. 69% programs ≥4 fellows/year, odds ratio 0.19 [95% confidence intervals 0.04-0.87]; p = .03). Program directors and associate program directors rated point-of-care ultrasound training as highly valuable to fellows' education. Barriers to use most commonly included lack of experience (64%), lack of oversight/interpretive guidance (58%), and lack of time (45%). Programs without point-of-care ultrasound training had significantly higher odds of listing lack of ultrasound access as a primary barrier (50% programs without vs. 13% programs with, odds ratio 6.5, [95% confidence intervals 1.3-50]; p = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observational survey-based study suggests that fewer than half of pediatric anesthesia training programs in the United States offer point-of-care ultrasound education. Additional research is needed to optimize this education and training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14851\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理点超声是麻醉医师的一种宝贵床旁工具,在美国已被纳入麻醉学住院医师培训和委员会认证。目的:描述美国儿科麻醉奖学金项目中护理点超声培训的现状:我们进行了一项横断面调查研究,调查对象是60个经美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会认证的儿科麻醉奖学金项目。有两个项目处于初始认证期,因缺乏历史数据而被排除在外。项目主任或副主任受邀完成了这份包含 23 个项目的调查:结果:58 个项目中有 33 个项目(57%)完成了调查。其中,15 个项目(45%)报告已开设护理点超声课程。与每年有≥4名研究员的项目相比,每年有≤3名研究员的项目不太可能开设超声课程(每年有0-3名研究员的项目占30%,而每年有≥4名研究员的项目占69%,几率比0.19 [95%置信区间0.04-0.87];P = .03)。项目主任和副主任认为,护理点超声培训对研究员的教育非常有价值。最常见的使用障碍包括缺乏经验(64%)、缺乏监督/解释性指导(58%)和缺乏时间(45%)。没有接受过护理点超声波培训的项目将无法使用超声波列为主要障碍的几率明显更高(没有接受过培训的项目占50%,接受过培训的项目占13%,几率比为6.5,[95%置信区间为1.3-50];P = .04):这项基于观察调查的研究表明,美国只有不到一半的儿科麻醉培训项目提供护理点超声波教育。需要开展更多研究,以优化儿科麻醉奖学金项目中的这一教育和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The state of point-of-care ultrasound training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States: A survey assessment.

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound is an invaluable bedside tool for anesthesiologists and has been integrated into anesthesiology residency training and board certification in the United States. Little is known about point-of-care ultrasound training practices in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.

Aims: To describe the current state of point-of-care ultrasound education in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs in the United States.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study distributed to 60 American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs. Two programs were in their initial accreditation period and were excluded due to lack of historical data. Program directors or associate program directors were invited to complete this 23-item survey.

Results: Thirty-three of fifty-eight programs (57%) completed the survey. Of those, 15 programs (45%) reported having a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum. Programs with ≤3 fellows per year were less likely to have an ultrasound curriculum compared to programs with ≥4 fellows per year (30% programs 0-3 fellows/year vs. 69% programs ≥4 fellows/year, odds ratio 0.19 [95% confidence intervals 0.04-0.87]; p = .03). Program directors and associate program directors rated point-of-care ultrasound training as highly valuable to fellows' education. Barriers to use most commonly included lack of experience (64%), lack of oversight/interpretive guidance (58%), and lack of time (45%). Programs without point-of-care ultrasound training had significantly higher odds of listing lack of ultrasound access as a primary barrier (50% programs without vs. 13% programs with, odds ratio 6.5, [95% confidence intervals 1.3-50]; p = .04).

Conclusions: This observational survey-based study suggests that fewer than half of pediatric anesthesia training programs in the United States offer point-of-care ultrasound education. Additional research is needed to optimize this education and training in pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The power of POCUS in every pocket: Handheld ultrasound the new essential tool? Severe knotting guidewire after central venous catheterization. Ball valve gas trapping in pediatric one-lung ventilation: Not all ventilation is loss of isolation. Links between mutations in functionally separate arms of mitochondrial complex I and responses to volatile anesthetics. Feasibility of bispectral index monitoring during pediatric critical care transport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1