胆管癌患者收入与存活率之间的关系:基于亚型的综合分析。

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-31 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.23-136
Calvin X Geng, Anuragh R Gudur, Jagannath Kadiyala, Daniel S Strand, Vanessa M Shami, Andrew Y Wang, Alexander Podboy, Tri M Le, Matthew Reilley, Victor Zaydfudim, Ross C D Buerlein
{"title":"胆管癌患者收入与存活率之间的关系:基于亚型的综合分析。","authors":"Calvin X Geng, Anuragh R Gudur, Jagannath Kadiyala, Daniel S Strand, Vanessa M Shami, Andrew Y Wang, Alexander Podboy, Tri M Le, Matthew Reilley, Victor Zaydfudim, Ross C D Buerlein","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.23-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004-2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"144-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive subtype-based analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Calvin X Geng, Anuragh R Gudur, Jagannath Kadiyala, Daniel S Strand, Vanessa M Shami, Andrew Y Wang, Alexander Podboy, Tri M Le, Matthew Reilley, Victor Zaydfudim, Ross C D Buerlein\",\"doi\":\"10.14701/ahbps.23-136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004-2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"144-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128791/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.23-136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.23-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胆管癌(CCA)患者健康的社会经济决定因素尚未完全定性。我们评估了社会经济状况如何影响 CCA 患者的初始治疗决策和生存结果,此外还根据原发肿瘤的解剖位置进行了多项子分析:使用 2018 年提交的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-18 数据库进行观察研究。根据家庭收入中位数(MHI)将2004-2015年的5476名CCA患者分为低收入组(MHI第25百分位数)。73%的患者拥有完整的随访数据,并被纳入生存分析。生存率和治疗结果使用 R-studio 进行计算:结果表明:当纳入所有 CCA 病例时,高收入组比低收入组更有可能接受手术、化疗和局部肿瘤切除术。基于收入的初始治疗方式在不同肿瘤位置之间存在显著差异。收入较低的患者在2年和5年内的总死亡率和癌症特异性死亡率较高。各组的非癌症死亡率相似。在肝内 CCA 亚组中,总体队列中发现的生存率差异依然存在。在肝周肿瘤的癌症特异性死亡率或总死亡率方面,各收入组之间没有发现差异,远端队列中的差异则不尽相同:结论:较低的收入与较高的癌症特异性死亡率和较低的CCA手术切除率有关。肝内肿瘤、肝周肿瘤和远端肿瘤在治疗选择和治疗效果方面存在明显差异。要改善患者的预后,必须采取基于人群的策略,找出造成这些差异的可能病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive subtype-based analysis.

Backgrounds/aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.

Methods: Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004-2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.

Results: When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.

Conclusions: Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes of single-incision cholecystectomy: Propensity score matching of robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP system and da Vinci Xi system vs. laparoscopic surgery. Irreversible electroporation as an intraoperative adjunctive treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: An initial clinical experience. Feasibility of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to predict biliary complications in living donor liver transplantation: A pilot study. Heterotopic pancreas of the gallbladder: A case report of a rare and commonly incidental finding. Propensity score analysis of adjuvant therapy in radically resected gallbladder cancers: a real world experience from a regional cancer center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1