直接口服抗凝剂达比加群对早期骨愈合的影响:大鼠实验研究

Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry Pub Date : 2023-11-07 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34172/japid.2023.020
Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis
{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂达比加群对早期骨愈合的影响:大鼠实验研究","authors":"Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis","doi":"10.34172/japid.2023.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, <i>P</i>=0.172) or the percentage of bone bridging (63.3% vs. 53.5%, <i>P</i>=0.401).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":73584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","volume":"15 2","pages":"86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran on early bone healing: An experimental study in rats.\",\"authors\":\"Ioanna Kyriakaki, Theodora Karanikola, Theodoros Lillis, Eleana Kontonasaki, Nikolaos Dabarakis\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/japid.2023.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, <i>P</i>=0.172) or the percentage of bone bridging (63.3% vs. 53.5%, <i>P</i>=0.401).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"86-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10862050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2023.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2023.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:达比加群属于新一代直接口服抗凝血剂(DOACs):达比加群属于新一代直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)。其优点是口服给药,无需监测国际正常化比率(INR)。虽然其使用量有所增加,但其对骨愈合和重塑的潜在副作用尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估达比加群对早期骨愈合可能产生的影响:将 16 只雄性 Wistar 大鼠分为两组,A 组每天口服 20 毫克/千克达比加群达 15 天,B 组为对照组。两组大鼠顶骨两侧各有一个圆形骨缺损(d=6 毫米)。手术两周后安乐死动物,采集组织样本(包含缺损的顶骨)进行组织学和组织形态计量学分析。统计分析的显著性水平为 α=0.5:结果:两组之间在再生骨(21.9% vs. 16.3%,P=0.172)或骨桥接百分比(63.3% vs. 53.5%,P=0.401)方面无统计学差异:结论:达比加群不影响骨再生,这表明与已知会导致骨愈合延迟的老式抗凝药物相比,达比加群可能是一种更安全的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran on early bone healing: An experimental study in rats.

Background: Dabigatran belongs to the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Its advantages are oral administration and no need for international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Although its use has increased, its potential side effects on bone healing and remodeling have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the possible effects of dabigatran on early bone healing.

Methods: Sixteen male Wistar rats were divided into two groups; in group A, 20-mg/kg dabigatran dose was administered orally daily for 15 days, while group B served as a control. Two circular bone defects (d=6 mm) were created on either side of the parietal bones. Two weeks after surgery and euthanasia of the animals, tissue samples (parietal bones that contained the defects) were harvested for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with a significance level of α=0.5.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the regenerated bone (21.9% vs. 16.3%, P=0.172) or the percentage of bone bridging (63.3% vs. 53.5%, P=0.401).

Conclusion: Dabigatran did not affect bone regeneration, suggesting that it might be a safer drug compared to older anticoagulants known to lead to bone healing delay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deep margin elevation; Indications and periodontal considerations. Effect of orthodontic forced eruption for implant site development in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review of clinical data. Beneficial effects of cranberry juice enriched with omega-3 fatty acids in patients with type 2 diabetic and periodontal disease: A randomized pilot clinical trial. Comparison of the effect of albumin with platelet-rich fibrin (Alb-PRF) gel and hyaluronic acid gel injection on interdental papilla reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. Effect of atorvastatin gel in non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1