利用机器学习技术评估夹砂管道整体扣式阻火器的阻火性能

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Marine Structures Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103599
Xipeng Wang , Chuangyi Wang , Lin Yuan , Zhi Ding
{"title":"利用机器学习技术评估夹砂管道整体扣式阻火器的阻火性能","authors":"Xipeng Wang ,&nbsp;Chuangyi Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhi Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integral buckle arrestors are regarded as the most effective arresting devices and can be perfectly adapted to innovative sandwich pipes. In the present study, hyperbaric chamber tests were performed on reduced-scale sandwich pipe specimens equipped with integral arrestors, and the effect of interface bonding behaviour on the crossover pressure was examined. Then, numerical frameworks were proposed to replicate buckling propagating and crossing phenomena under hydrostatic pressure, with a strong consistency between measurements and predictions. A broad parametric analysis on the crossover pressure was implemented covering key material properties and geometries. After that, machine learning techniques were introduced and used for predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency. Four algorithms, involving Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine, were established using a dataset comprising 248 cases with thirteen variables. Based upon an evaluation of standard statistical metrics, it is observed that RF and MLP exhibit superior prediction accuracy, whereas the prediction performance of KNN is the worst. The results show that the machine learning method provides relatively reliable predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency for both flattening and flipping failure modes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49879,"journal":{"name":"Marine Structures","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 103599"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of arresting performance of integral buckle arrestors for sandwich pipes using machine learning techniques\",\"authors\":\"Xipeng Wang ,&nbsp;Chuangyi Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhi Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Integral buckle arrestors are regarded as the most effective arresting devices and can be perfectly adapted to innovative sandwich pipes. In the present study, hyperbaric chamber tests were performed on reduced-scale sandwich pipe specimens equipped with integral arrestors, and the effect of interface bonding behaviour on the crossover pressure was examined. Then, numerical frameworks were proposed to replicate buckling propagating and crossing phenomena under hydrostatic pressure, with a strong consistency between measurements and predictions. A broad parametric analysis on the crossover pressure was implemented covering key material properties and geometries. After that, machine learning techniques were introduced and used for predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency. Four algorithms, involving Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine, were established using a dataset comprising 248 cases with thirteen variables. Based upon an evaluation of standard statistical metrics, it is observed that RF and MLP exhibit superior prediction accuracy, whereas the prediction performance of KNN is the worst. The results show that the machine learning method provides relatively reliable predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency for both flattening and flipping failure modes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Structures\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924000273\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924000273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整体扣式阻尼器被认为是最有效的阻尼装置,可以完美地适用于创新型夹层管道。在本研究中,对配备了整体式阻尼器的缩小尺度夹层管道试样进行了高压氧舱试验,并研究了界面粘接行为对交叉压力的影响。然后,提出了数值框架来复制静水压力下的屈曲传播和交叉现象,测量结果和预测结果之间具有很强的一致性。对交叉压力进行了广泛的参数分析,涵盖了关键的材料特性和几何形状。之后,引入了机器学习技术,并将其用于预测交叉压力和阻挡效率。使用由 248 个案例和 13 个变量组成的数据集,建立了四种算法,包括随机森林算法、多层感知器算法、K-近邻算法和支持向量机算法。根据对标准统计指标的评估,可以看出 RF 和 MLP 的预测准确率较高,而 KNN 的预测性能最差。结果表明,机器学习方法可对扁平化和翻转两种失效模式的交叉压力和捕获效率提供相对可靠的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of arresting performance of integral buckle arrestors for sandwich pipes using machine learning techniques

Integral buckle arrestors are regarded as the most effective arresting devices and can be perfectly adapted to innovative sandwich pipes. In the present study, hyperbaric chamber tests were performed on reduced-scale sandwich pipe specimens equipped with integral arrestors, and the effect of interface bonding behaviour on the crossover pressure was examined. Then, numerical frameworks were proposed to replicate buckling propagating and crossing phenomena under hydrostatic pressure, with a strong consistency between measurements and predictions. A broad parametric analysis on the crossover pressure was implemented covering key material properties and geometries. After that, machine learning techniques were introduced and used for predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency. Four algorithms, involving Random Forest, Multi-layer Perceptron, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Support Vector Machine, were established using a dataset comprising 248 cases with thirteen variables. Based upon an evaluation of standard statistical metrics, it is observed that RF and MLP exhibit superior prediction accuracy, whereas the prediction performance of KNN is the worst. The results show that the machine learning method provides relatively reliable predictions of crossover pressure and arresting efficiency for both flattening and flipping failure modes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Structures
Marine Structures 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide a medium for presentation and discussion of the latest developments in research, design, fabrication and in-service experience relating to marine structures, i.e., all structures of steel, concrete, light alloy or composite construction having an interface with the sea, including ships, fixed and mobile offshore platforms, submarine and submersibles, pipelines, subsea systems for shallow and deep ocean operations and coastal structures such as piers.
期刊最新文献
Design of a quick-connection device for installing pre-assembled offshore wind turbines A probability-based study on failure mechanism and quantitative risk analysis for buried offshore pipelines subjected to third-party impact loads, exploring the effects of spatial variability of soil strength Elastic mode expansion in smoothed particle hydrodynamics framework for hydroelasticity and validation with 3D hydroelastic wedge impact experiments An ULS reliability-based design method for mooring lines using an efficient full long-term approach Structural performance at the joint of precast pile-supported pier structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1