比较精子和睾丸介导的基因转移在转基因动物生产中的两种方法:系统综述。

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal genetics Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1111/age.13404
Zeinab Dehghan, Gholamhossein Darya, Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani, Amin Derakhshanfar
{"title":"比较精子和睾丸介导的基因转移在转基因动物生产中的两种方法:系统综述。","authors":"Zeinab Dehghan,&nbsp;Gholamhossein Darya,&nbsp;Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani,&nbsp;Amin Derakhshanfar","doi":"10.1111/age.13404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transgenic (Tg) animal technology is one of the growing areas in biology. Various Tg technologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are available for generating Tg animals. These include zygote microinjection, electroporation, viral infection, embryonic stem cell or spermatogonial stem cell-mediated production of Tg animals, sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT), and testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT). However, there are currently no comprehensive studies comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, selecting appropriate gene delivery carriers (such as nanoparticles and liposomes), and determining the optimal route for gene delivery (SMGT and TMGT) for producing Tg animal. Here we aim to provide a comprehensive assessment comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, and to introduce the best carriers and gene transfer methods to sperm and testis to generate Tg animals in different species. From 2010 to 2022, 47 studies on SMGT and 25 studies on TMGT have been conducted. Mice and rats were the most commonly used species in SMGT and TMGT. Regarding the SMGT approach, nanoparticles, streptolysin-O, and virus packaging were found to be the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice. In the TMGT method, the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice and rats were virus packaging, dimethyl sulfoxide, electroporation, and liposome. Our study has shown that the efficiency of producing Tg animals varies depending on the species, gene carrier, and method of gene transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":7905,"journal":{"name":"Animal genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/age.13404","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two methods of sperm- and testis-mediated gene transfer in production of transgenic animals: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Dehghan,&nbsp;Gholamhossein Darya,&nbsp;Shayesteh Mehdinejadiani,&nbsp;Amin Derakhshanfar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/age.13404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transgenic (Tg) animal technology is one of the growing areas in biology. Various Tg technologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are available for generating Tg animals. These include zygote microinjection, electroporation, viral infection, embryonic stem cell or spermatogonial stem cell-mediated production of Tg animals, sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT), and testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT). However, there are currently no comprehensive studies comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, selecting appropriate gene delivery carriers (such as nanoparticles and liposomes), and determining the optimal route for gene delivery (SMGT and TMGT) for producing Tg animal. Here we aim to provide a comprehensive assessment comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, and to introduce the best carriers and gene transfer methods to sperm and testis to generate Tg animals in different species. From 2010 to 2022, 47 studies on SMGT and 25 studies on TMGT have been conducted. Mice and rats were the most commonly used species in SMGT and TMGT. Regarding the SMGT approach, nanoparticles, streptolysin-O, and virus packaging were found to be the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice. In the TMGT method, the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice and rats were virus packaging, dimethyl sulfoxide, electroporation, and liposome. Our study has shown that the efficiency of producing Tg animals varies depending on the species, gene carrier, and method of gene transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal genetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/age.13404\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/age.13404\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/age.13404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转基因(Tg)动物技术是生物学中不断发展的领域之一。目前有多种 Tg 技术可用于产生 Tg 动物,这些技术各有利弊。这些技术包括卵子显微注射、电穿孔、病毒感染、胚胎干细胞或精原干细胞介导的 Tg 动物生产、精子介导的基因转移(SMGT)和睾丸介导的基因转移(TMGT)。然而,目前还没有全面的研究对 SMGT 和 TMGT 方法进行比较,选择合适的基因传递载体(如纳米颗粒和脂质体),并确定生产 Tg 动物的最佳基因传递途径(SMGT 和 TMGT)。在此,我们旨在对SMGT和TMGT方法进行全面评估比较,并介绍在不同物种中产生Tg动物的精子和睾丸的最佳载体和基因转移方法。从 2010 年到 2022 年,共进行了 47 项 SMGT 研究和 25 项 TMGT 研究。小鼠和大鼠是 SMGT 和 TMGT 最常用的物种。在 SMGT 方法中,纳米颗粒、链霉素-O 和病毒包装被认为是产生 Tg 小鼠的最佳基因转移方法。在 TMGT 方法中,产生 Tg 小鼠和大鼠的最佳基因转移方法是病毒包装、二甲基亚砜、电穿孔和脂质体。我们的研究表明,产生 Tg 动物的效率因物种、基因载体和基因转移方法而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of two methods of sperm- and testis-mediated gene transfer in production of transgenic animals: A systematic review

Transgenic (Tg) animal technology is one of the growing areas in biology. Various Tg technologies, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, are available for generating Tg animals. These include zygote microinjection, electroporation, viral infection, embryonic stem cell or spermatogonial stem cell-mediated production of Tg animals, sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT), and testis-mediated gene transfer (TMGT). However, there are currently no comprehensive studies comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, selecting appropriate gene delivery carriers (such as nanoparticles and liposomes), and determining the optimal route for gene delivery (SMGT and TMGT) for producing Tg animal. Here we aim to provide a comprehensive assessment comparing SMGT and TMGT methods, and to introduce the best carriers and gene transfer methods to sperm and testis to generate Tg animals in different species. From 2010 to 2022, 47 studies on SMGT and 25 studies on TMGT have been conducted. Mice and rats were the most commonly used species in SMGT and TMGT. Regarding the SMGT approach, nanoparticles, streptolysin-O, and virus packaging were found to be the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice. In the TMGT method, the best gene transfer methods for generating Tg mice and rats were virus packaging, dimethyl sulfoxide, electroporation, and liposome. Our study has shown that the efficiency of producing Tg animals varies depending on the species, gene carrier, and method of gene transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal genetics
Animal genetics 生物-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
115
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Animal Genetics reports frontline research on immunogenetics, molecular genetics and functional genomics of economically important and domesticated animals. Publications include the study of variability at gene and protein levels, mapping of genes, traits and QTLs, associations between genes and traits, genetic diversity, and characterization of gene or protein expression and control related to phenotypic or genetic variation. The journal publishes full-length articles, short communications and brief notes, as well as commissioned and submitted mini-reviews on issues of interest to Animal Genetics readers.
期刊最新文献
Intragenic dystrophin (DMD) duplication variant in Entlebucher Mountain Dogs with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The African introgression of Murciano Granadina goats has a Moroccan origin and displays remarkable levels of inter-individual variability Issue Information ZFAT (isoform-specific) and its antisense RNA 1 (ZFAT-AS1) are two allele-specific monoallelically expressed genes in cattle. Genomic responses to climatic challenges in beef cattle: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1