类风湿性关节炎患者全关节置换术后假体周围感染的最有效治疗方法是什么?系统综述。

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-15 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124
Vineet Desai, Alexander R Farid, Adriana P Liimakka, Jaime Lora-Tamayo, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Jesse W P Kuiper, Nemandra Sandiford, Antonia F Chen
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎患者全关节置换术后假体周围感染的最有效治疗方法是什么?系统综述。","authors":"Vineet Desai, Alexander R Farid, Adriana P Liimakka, Jaime Lora-Tamayo, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Jesse W P Kuiper, Nemandra Sandiford, Antonia F Chen","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review comparing the failure rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (OSR), and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (TSR) for RA patients with PJI and identify risk factors in the RA population associated with increased treatment failure rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase databases were screened with the terms \"rheumatoid arthritis,\" \"total joint arthroplasty,\" \"prosthetic joint infection,\" and \"treatment for PJI\" on August 29, 2021. Four hundred ninety-one studies were screened, of which 86 were evaluated. The primary outcome evaluated was failure of surgical treatment for PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies were included after full-text screening, yielding 401 patients with RA. Additional demographic and PJI management data were obtained for 149 patients. Patients with RA who underwent TSR demonstrated a lower failure rate (26.8%) than both DAIR (60.1%) and OSR (39.2%) (χ2 = 37.463, p < 0.00001). Patients with RA who underwent DAIR had a 2.27 (95% CI, 1.66-3.10) times higher risk of experiencing treatment failure than those who underwent TSR. Among risk factors, there was a significant difference in the C-reactive protein of patients who did vs. did not experience treatment failure (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TSR has a higher rate of success in the management of PJI patients with RA compared with DAIR and OSR. The complete removal of the infected prosthesis and delayed reimplantation may lower the treatment failure rate.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Vineet Desai, Alexander R Farid, Adriana P Liimakka, Jaime Lora-Tamayo, Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Jesse W P Kuiper, Nemandra Sandiford, Antonia F Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review comparing the failure rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (OSR), and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (TSR) for RA patients with PJI and identify risk factors in the RA population associated with increased treatment failure rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase databases were screened with the terms \\\"rheumatoid arthritis,\\\" \\\"total joint arthroplasty,\\\" \\\"prosthetic joint infection,\\\" and \\\"treatment for PJI\\\" on August 29, 2021. Four hundred ninety-one studies were screened, of which 86 were evaluated. The primary outcome evaluated was failure of surgical treatment for PJI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten retrospective cohort studies were included after full-text screening, yielding 401 patients with RA. Additional demographic and PJI management data were obtained for 149 patients. Patients with RA who underwent TSR demonstrated a lower failure rate (26.8%) than both DAIR (60.1%) and OSR (39.2%) (χ2 = 37.463, p < 0.00001). Patients with RA who underwent DAIR had a 2.27 (95% CI, 1.66-3.10) times higher risk of experiencing treatment failure than those who underwent TSR. Among risk factors, there was a significant difference in the C-reactive protein of patients who did vs. did not experience treatment failure (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TSR has a higher rate of success in the management of PJI patients with RA compared with DAIR and OSR. The complete removal of the infected prosthesis and delayed reimplantation may lower the treatment failure rate.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Reviews\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.23.00124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)是全关节置换术(TJA)后假体周围感染(PJI)的一个危险因素。本研究旨在对PJI的RA患者进行系统性回顾,比较清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)、一期置换关节成形术/翻修(OSR)和二期置换关节成形术/翻修(TSR)的失败率,并确定RA人群中与治疗失败率增加相关的风险因素:2021年8月29日,在PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE和Ovid Embase数据库中以 "类风湿性关节炎"、"全关节关节成形术"、"人工关节感染 "和 "PJI治疗 "为关键词进行筛选。共筛选出 491 项研究,对其中的 86 项进行了评估。评估的主要结果是 PJI 手术治疗失败:结果:经过全文筛选,共纳入十项回顾性队列研究,其中包括 401 名 RA 患者。另外还获得了149名患者的人口统计学和PJI管理数据。接受TSR的RA患者的失败率(26.8%)低于DAIR(60.1%)和OSR(39.2%)(χ2 = 37.463,P < 0.00001)。接受 DAIR 的 RA 患者出现治疗失败的风险是接受 TSR 患者的 2.27 倍(95% CI,1.66-3.10)。在风险因素中,治疗失败与未治疗失败患者的C反应蛋白存在显著差异(P = 0.02):结论:与DAIR和OSR相比,TSR治疗PJI患者的成功率更高。结论:与 DAIR 和 OSR 相比,TSR 治疗患有 RA 的 PJI 患者的成功率更高。完全切除受感染的假体并延迟再植可降低治疗失败率:证据等级:三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?: A Systematic Review.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review comparing the failure rates of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), one-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (OSR), and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty/revision (TSR) for RA patients with PJI and identify risk factors in the RA population associated with increased treatment failure rate.

Methods: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase databases were screened with the terms "rheumatoid arthritis," "total joint arthroplasty," "prosthetic joint infection," and "treatment for PJI" on August 29, 2021. Four hundred ninety-one studies were screened, of which 86 were evaluated. The primary outcome evaluated was failure of surgical treatment for PJI.

Results: Ten retrospective cohort studies were included after full-text screening, yielding 401 patients with RA. Additional demographic and PJI management data were obtained for 149 patients. Patients with RA who underwent TSR demonstrated a lower failure rate (26.8%) than both DAIR (60.1%) and OSR (39.2%) (χ2 = 37.463, p < 0.00001). Patients with RA who underwent DAIR had a 2.27 (95% CI, 1.66-3.10) times higher risk of experiencing treatment failure than those who underwent TSR. Among risk factors, there was a significant difference in the C-reactive protein of patients who did vs. did not experience treatment failure (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: TSR has a higher rate of success in the management of PJI patients with RA compared with DAIR and OSR. The complete removal of the infected prosthesis and delayed reimplantation may lower the treatment failure rate.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
期刊最新文献
Health Policy Challenges and Reforms: Critical Updates for Orthopaedic Surgeons. Older Patients May Fare Better Following Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Osteotomies of the Knee for Valgus Malalignment. The Mechanisms and Safety of Corticosteroid Injections in Orthopaedic Surgery. Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Review of Classification, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Best Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1