通过简单的人体测量预测掌长肌腱的长度和厚度

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1055/a-2239-6341
Koray Kaya Kilic, Ozkan Kose, Omer Faruk Egerci, Firat Dogruoz, Faruk Aykanat
{"title":"通过简单的人体测量预测掌长肌腱的长度和厚度","authors":"Koray Kaya Kilic, Ozkan Kose, Omer Faruk Egerci, Firat Dogruoz, Faruk Aykanat","doi":"10.1055/a-2239-6341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test whether palmaris longus tendon (PLT) length and thickness can be predicted from simple anthropometric measurements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>120 healthy volunteers with bilateral PL muscles were enrolled in this prospective study. PLT length and thickness were measured by ultrasonographic examination. Anthropometric measurements included body height, weight, forearm length, and wrist circumference. Correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PLT length and thickness were 10.8±1.4 cm and 4.0±0.9 mm, respectively. Body height and PLT length had a moderate positive correlation (r:0.407, p:0.001), and forearm length and PLT thickness had a weak positive correlation (r:0.229, p:0.001). The regression analysis showed that body height was the best predictor for PLT length, and forearm length was the best predictor for PLT thickness. The regression equations were as follows: PLT length=0.276+(0.062×height) (r2=0.165, p<0.001) and PLT thickness=1.373+(0.108×forearm length) (r2=0.052, p<0.001). The predicted PLT lengths and thicknesses were calculated using these regression formulas and compared with the actual thicknesses and lengths using the Bland-Altman plot. The upper and lower limits of agreement (95% CI) ranged from -2.54 cm to 2.51 cm for actual PLT length and predicted PLT length and from -1.76 mm to 1.74 mm for actual PLT thickness and predicted PLT thickness in the Bland-Altman plot with a weak agreement and proportional bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that height and forearm length have limited accuracy in predicting PLT length and thickness. The preoperative ultrasonographic examination can provide valuable assistance, particularly in cases that require grafts with precise length and thickness requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction Of Palmaris Longus Tendon Length And Thickness Through Simple Anthropometric Measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Koray Kaya Kilic, Ozkan Kose, Omer Faruk Egerci, Firat Dogruoz, Faruk Aykanat\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2239-6341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test whether palmaris longus tendon (PLT) length and thickness can be predicted from simple anthropometric measurements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>120 healthy volunteers with bilateral PL muscles were enrolled in this prospective study. PLT length and thickness were measured by ultrasonographic examination. Anthropometric measurements included body height, weight, forearm length, and wrist circumference. Correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PLT length and thickness were 10.8±1.4 cm and 4.0±0.9 mm, respectively. Body height and PLT length had a moderate positive correlation (r:0.407, p:0.001), and forearm length and PLT thickness had a weak positive correlation (r:0.229, p:0.001). The regression analysis showed that body height was the best predictor for PLT length, and forearm length was the best predictor for PLT thickness. The regression equations were as follows: PLT length=0.276+(0.062×height) (r2=0.165, p<0.001) and PLT thickness=1.373+(0.108×forearm length) (r2=0.052, p<0.001). The predicted PLT lengths and thicknesses were calculated using these regression formulas and compared with the actual thicknesses and lengths using the Bland-Altman plot. The upper and lower limits of agreement (95% CI) ranged from -2.54 cm to 2.51 cm for actual PLT length and predicted PLT length and from -1.76 mm to 1.74 mm for actual PLT thickness and predicted PLT thickness in the Bland-Altman plot with a weak agreement and proportional bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that height and forearm length have limited accuracy in predicting PLT length and thickness. The preoperative ultrasonographic examination can provide valuable assistance, particularly in cases that require grafts with precise length and thickness requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2239-6341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2239-6341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在检验是否可以通过简单的人体测量来预测掌长肌腱(PLT)的长度和厚度。通过超声波检查测量了PLT的长度和厚度。人体测量包括身高、体重、前臂长度和腕围。采用相关性、线性回归和Bland-Altman图进行分析:结果:PLT的平均长度和厚度分别为10.8±1.4厘米和4.0±0.9毫米。身高与 PLT 长度呈中度正相关(r:0.407,p:0.001),前臂长度与 PLT 厚度呈弱正相关(r:0.229,p:0.001)。回归分析表明,身高是预测 PLT 长度的最佳指标,前臂长度是预测 PLT 厚度的最佳指标。回归方程如下PLT长度=0.276+(0.062×身高)(r2=0.165,p结论:这些研究结果表明,身高和前臂长度在预测 PLT 长度和厚度方面的准确性有限。术前超声波检查可以提供有价值的帮助,尤其是在需要精确长度和厚度的移植物的病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction Of Palmaris Longus Tendon Length And Thickness Through Simple Anthropometric Measurements.

Objective: This study aimed to test whether palmaris longus tendon (PLT) length and thickness can be predicted from simple anthropometric measurements.

Materials and methods: 120 healthy volunteers with bilateral PL muscles were enrolled in this prospective study. PLT length and thickness were measured by ultrasonographic examination. Anthropometric measurements included body height, weight, forearm length, and wrist circumference. Correlation, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot were used for analysis.

Results: The mean PLT length and thickness were 10.8±1.4 cm and 4.0±0.9 mm, respectively. Body height and PLT length had a moderate positive correlation (r:0.407, p:0.001), and forearm length and PLT thickness had a weak positive correlation (r:0.229, p:0.001). The regression analysis showed that body height was the best predictor for PLT length, and forearm length was the best predictor for PLT thickness. The regression equations were as follows: PLT length=0.276+(0.062×height) (r2=0.165, p<0.001) and PLT thickness=1.373+(0.108×forearm length) (r2=0.052, p<0.001). The predicted PLT lengths and thicknesses were calculated using these regression formulas and compared with the actual thicknesses and lengths using the Bland-Altman plot. The upper and lower limits of agreement (95% CI) ranged from -2.54 cm to 2.51 cm for actual PLT length and predicted PLT length and from -1.76 mm to 1.74 mm for actual PLT thickness and predicted PLT thickness in the Bland-Altman plot with a weak agreement and proportional bias.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that height and forearm length have limited accuracy in predicting PLT length and thickness. The preoperative ultrasonographic examination can provide valuable assistance, particularly in cases that require grafts with precise length and thickness requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
期刊最新文献
[Hairiness and Skin Colouration after Breast Reconstruction with a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Reconstruction of the Nipple-Areolar Complex]. [Recurrence of a Desmoid Tumour in a Scar at the Donor Site of a Latissimus Dorsi Flap]. [Sequential Chimeric Osteocutaneous DCIA-Perforator-SIEA Flap to Reconstruct an Osteocutaneous Defect in the Lower Extremity and the Importance of Preserving the Ascending Branch - A Case Report]. [Two-stage microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction of a complex sacral wound using an arteriovenous loop]. [Coverage of complex pararectal pelvic defects: role of the free myocutaneous musculus vastus lateralis flap].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1