拓展合作写作研究框架:对合作写作者和独立写作者如何定位写作空间的纵向分析

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101096
Gary G. Fogal
{"title":"拓展合作写作研究框架:对合作写作者和独立写作者如何定位写作空间的纵向分析","authors":"Gary G. Fogal","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent reviews of the L2 collaborative writing (CW) literature have highlighted a propensity for researchers to rely on learner and task-related variables to explore CW phenomena. However, this focus limits how scholars conceptualize CW by overlooking the wider educational context that accompanies CW activities and how writers orient to said spaces. Investigating how writers perceive the CW landscape is important as their perceptions are known to impact writing development. Engaging a systems orientation to writing spaces, this study examined how students in different writing conditions perceive the writing landscape. This work followed two intact university classes (one engaged in CW, and one not) over one semester, and collected data from five iterations of a system mapping task and interviews with students. The CW group perceived a more nuanced and complex perspective of the writing space, comparatively. Cluster analyses also revealed that both groups oriented similarly to two variable sets: task and environmental factors, and learner and environmental variables. This study demonstrates how CW positively impacts writers’ perceptions of the writing space and encourages instructors to help CW students realize and take advantage of the wider context that CW is embedded in. This work also expands the CW research framework.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000031/pdfft?md5=9d3bf122c21fee6db7ce8b6eb557da19&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374324000031-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expanding the collaborative writing research framework: A longitudinal analysis of how collaborative and independent writers orient to writing spaces\",\"authors\":\"Gary G. Fogal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recent reviews of the L2 collaborative writing (CW) literature have highlighted a propensity for researchers to rely on learner and task-related variables to explore CW phenomena. However, this focus limits how scholars conceptualize CW by overlooking the wider educational context that accompanies CW activities and how writers orient to said spaces. Investigating how writers perceive the CW landscape is important as their perceptions are known to impact writing development. Engaging a systems orientation to writing spaces, this study examined how students in different writing conditions perceive the writing landscape. This work followed two intact university classes (one engaged in CW, and one not) over one semester, and collected data from five iterations of a system mapping task and interviews with students. The CW group perceived a more nuanced and complex perspective of the writing space, comparatively. Cluster analyses also revealed that both groups oriented similarly to two variable sets: task and environmental factors, and learner and environmental variables. This study demonstrates how CW positively impacts writers’ perceptions of the writing space and encourages instructors to help CW students realize and take advantage of the wider context that CW is embedded in. This work also expands the CW research framework.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000031/pdfft?md5=9d3bf122c21fee6db7ce8b6eb557da19&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374324000031-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Second Language Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对第二语言协作写作(CW)文献的评论强调,研究人员倾向于依靠与学习者和任务相关的变量来探索协作写作现象。然而,这种关注点限制了学者们对 CW 的概念化,因为他们忽略了伴随 CW 活动的更广泛的教育背景以及写作者如何定位这些空间。众所周知,写作者的看法会影响写作的发展,因此,调查写作者如何看待化学武器环境非常重要。通过对写作空间的系统定位,本研究考察了不同写作条件下的学生是如何看待写作环境的。这项研究对两个完整的大学班级(一个班级参与了CW,另一个班级没有参与)进行了为期一个学期的跟踪调查,并从系统绘图任务的五次迭代和对学生的访谈中收集了数据。相对而言,CW 小组对写作空间的看法更细致、更复杂。聚类分析还显示,两组学生对两个变量组的取向相似:任务和环境因素,以及学习者和环境变量。这项研究证明了CW如何积极影响写作者对写作空间的看法,并鼓励教师帮助CW学生认识到并利用CW所蕴含的更广泛的背景。这项工作还扩展了CW研究框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expanding the collaborative writing research framework: A longitudinal analysis of how collaborative and independent writers orient to writing spaces

Recent reviews of the L2 collaborative writing (CW) literature have highlighted a propensity for researchers to rely on learner and task-related variables to explore CW phenomena. However, this focus limits how scholars conceptualize CW by overlooking the wider educational context that accompanies CW activities and how writers orient to said spaces. Investigating how writers perceive the CW landscape is important as their perceptions are known to impact writing development. Engaging a systems orientation to writing spaces, this study examined how students in different writing conditions perceive the writing landscape. This work followed two intact university classes (one engaged in CW, and one not) over one semester, and collected data from five iterations of a system mapping task and interviews with students. The CW group perceived a more nuanced and complex perspective of the writing space, comparatively. Cluster analyses also revealed that both groups oriented similarly to two variable sets: task and environmental factors, and learner and environmental variables. This study demonstrates how CW positively impacts writers’ perceptions of the writing space and encourages instructors to help CW students realize and take advantage of the wider context that CW is embedded in. This work also expands the CW research framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1