将登记册和大型数据库用于毒理学研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Journal of Medical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s13181-024-00997-z
Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Daniel A Laub, Mark B Mycyk
{"title":"将登记册和大型数据库用于毒理学研究。","authors":"Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Daniel A Laub, Mark B Mycyk","doi":"10.1007/s13181-024-00997-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The advancement of medical toxicology knowledge has traditionally relied on case reports and case series because of the ethical challenges involved in studying poisoned patients. The growing availability of several large databases and registries now allows researchers to describe and analyze patterns in poisoned patients who share a particular exposure, outcome, or condition. A large database or registry can be useful in generating hypotheses, supporting extramural funding applications, and planning more rigorous studies. Knowing how to access and interpret data in registries such as NPDS, NHAMCS, and HCUP is essential for all stakeholders engaged in medical toxicology research. This review describes the strengths and limitations of different toxicology-relevant registries and databases and how to leverage these powerful tools to advance the science in the field of medical toxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Registries and Large Databases for Toxicology Research.\",\"authors\":\"Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Daniel A Laub, Mark B Mycyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-024-00997-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The advancement of medical toxicology knowledge has traditionally relied on case reports and case series because of the ethical challenges involved in studying poisoned patients. The growing availability of several large databases and registries now allows researchers to describe and analyze patterns in poisoned patients who share a particular exposure, outcome, or condition. A large database or registry can be useful in generating hypotheses, supporting extramural funding applications, and planning more rigorous studies. Knowing how to access and interpret data in registries such as NPDS, NHAMCS, and HCUP is essential for all stakeholders engaged in medical toxicology research. This review describes the strengths and limitations of different toxicology-relevant registries and databases and how to leverage these powerful tools to advance the science in the field of medical toxicology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-00997-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-00997-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学毒理学知识的发展历来依赖于病例报告和系列病例,因为研究中毒患者涉及伦理挑战。现在,越来越多的大型数据库和登记处允许研究人员描述和分析具有特定暴露、结果或状况的中毒患者的模式。大型数据库或登记处有助于提出假设、支持校外资助申请以及规划更严格的研究。了解如何访问和解释 NPDS、NHAMCS 和 HCUP 等登记册中的数据,对于从事医学毒理学研究的所有相关人员来说都至关重要。本综述介绍了不同毒理学相关登记处和数据库的优势和局限性,以及如何利用这些强大的工具来推动医学毒理学领域的科学发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Registries and Large Databases for Toxicology Research.

The advancement of medical toxicology knowledge has traditionally relied on case reports and case series because of the ethical challenges involved in studying poisoned patients. The growing availability of several large databases and registries now allows researchers to describe and analyze patterns in poisoned patients who share a particular exposure, outcome, or condition. A large database or registry can be useful in generating hypotheses, supporting extramural funding applications, and planning more rigorous studies. Knowing how to access and interpret data in registries such as NPDS, NHAMCS, and HCUP is essential for all stakeholders engaged in medical toxicology research. This review describes the strengths and limitations of different toxicology-relevant registries and databases and how to leverage these powerful tools to advance the science in the field of medical toxicology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
期刊最新文献
Investigating a Novel Two-Bag N-Acetylcysteine Regimen for Acetaminophen Toxicity. Intravenous Acetylcysteine: What Should Replace the Prescott "Three-Bag" Protocol? Comment on "Safety of Physostigmine for Pediatric Antimuscarinic Poisoning". In Response to Comment on "Safety of Physostigmine for Pediatric Antimuscarinic Poisoning". Pharmacobezoar Associated Prolonged Clinical Course in a Patient with Immediate Release Quetiapine Overdose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1