Eric Macias MS, Kendall Hartline MS, Patrick Buzzini PhD, Sheree Hughes PhD
{"title":"对烧焦的骨头进行定量颜色分析,以预测 DNA 的数量、质量和基因分型的成功率。","authors":"Eric Macias MS, Kendall Hartline MS, Patrick Buzzini PhD, Sheree Hughes PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Badly burned skeletal remains are commonly submitted to forensic laboratories for victim identification via DNA analysis methods. Burned skeletal remains present many challenges for DNA analysis as they can contain low amounts of DNA which can also be damaged and degraded, resulting in partial or no STR profiles. Therefore, a simple, but effective screening method that identifies which samples may provide the most successful STR or mtDNA typing results for identification would enable forensic laboratories to save time, money, and resources. One metric that can be used and a screening method is the color of burned bone, as bone color changes with exposure to fire as temperature and length of exposure increase. This research developed a quantitative screening method based on the surface color of burned bone. The different visual bone colors (light brown, dark brown, black, gray, and white) were quantified using the Commission on Illumination <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> color space. These values were then compared to DNA yield, STR, and mtDNA profile completeness to identify whether the <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> values can predict genotyping success. A Bayesian network was constructed to determine the probability of STR typing success, given a set of <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> values. Results demonstrated that samples with an <i>a</i>* value greater than or equal to one and <i>b</i>* value greater than eight (light brown and dark brown burned samples) were the most predictive of STR typing success and mtDNA typing success. A decision tree for processing burned bones was constructed based on the color value thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative color analysis of burned bone to predict DNA quantity, quality, and genotyping success\",\"authors\":\"Eric Macias MS, Kendall Hartline MS, Patrick Buzzini PhD, Sheree Hughes PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.15490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Badly burned skeletal remains are commonly submitted to forensic laboratories for victim identification via DNA analysis methods. Burned skeletal remains present many challenges for DNA analysis as they can contain low amounts of DNA which can also be damaged and degraded, resulting in partial or no STR profiles. Therefore, a simple, but effective screening method that identifies which samples may provide the most successful STR or mtDNA typing results for identification would enable forensic laboratories to save time, money, and resources. One metric that can be used and a screening method is the color of burned bone, as bone color changes with exposure to fire as temperature and length of exposure increase. This research developed a quantitative screening method based on the surface color of burned bone. The different visual bone colors (light brown, dark brown, black, gray, and white) were quantified using the Commission on Illumination <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> color space. These values were then compared to DNA yield, STR, and mtDNA profile completeness to identify whether the <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> values can predict genotyping success. A Bayesian network was constructed to determine the probability of STR typing success, given a set of <i>L</i>*<i>a</i>*<i>b</i> values. Results demonstrated that samples with an <i>a</i>* value greater than or equal to one and <i>b</i>* value greater than eight (light brown and dark brown burned samples) were the most predictive of STR typing success and mtDNA typing success. A decision tree for processing burned bones was constructed based on the color value thresholds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15490\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
被严重烧毁的遗骸通常会提交给法医实验室,以便通过 DNA 分析方法鉴定受害者身份。被烧毁的遗骸可能含有少量 DNA,而且这些 DNA 还可能被损坏和降解,从而导致部分或没有 STR 图谱,这给 DNA 分析带来了许多挑战。因此,一种简单但有效的筛选方法可以确定哪些样本可以提供最成功的 STR 或 mtDNA 类型鉴定结果,从而使法医实验室节省时间、金钱和资源。一种可用于筛选方法的指标是烧焦骨头的颜色,因为骨头的颜色会随着暴露在火中的温度和暴露时间的增加而改变。这项研究开发了一种基于烧伤骨骼表面颜色的定量筛选方法。使用照明委员会 L*a*b 色彩空间对不同视觉骨骼颜色(浅棕色、深棕色、黑色、灰色和白色)进行了量化。然后将这些值与 DNA 产量、STR 和 mtDNA 图谱完整性进行比较,以确定 L*a*b 值是否能预测基因分型的成功率。在一组 L*a*b 值的基础上,构建了一个贝叶斯网络来确定 STR 分型成功的概率。结果表明,a*值大于或等于1且b*值大于8的样本(浅棕色和深棕色烧毁样本)最能预测STR分型成功率和mtDNA分型成功率。根据颜色值阈值构建了处理烧焦骨骼的决策树。
Quantitative color analysis of burned bone to predict DNA quantity, quality, and genotyping success
Badly burned skeletal remains are commonly submitted to forensic laboratories for victim identification via DNA analysis methods. Burned skeletal remains present many challenges for DNA analysis as they can contain low amounts of DNA which can also be damaged and degraded, resulting in partial or no STR profiles. Therefore, a simple, but effective screening method that identifies which samples may provide the most successful STR or mtDNA typing results for identification would enable forensic laboratories to save time, money, and resources. One metric that can be used and a screening method is the color of burned bone, as bone color changes with exposure to fire as temperature and length of exposure increase. This research developed a quantitative screening method based on the surface color of burned bone. The different visual bone colors (light brown, dark brown, black, gray, and white) were quantified using the Commission on Illumination L*a*b color space. These values were then compared to DNA yield, STR, and mtDNA profile completeness to identify whether the L*a*b values can predict genotyping success. A Bayesian network was constructed to determine the probability of STR typing success, given a set of L*a*b values. Results demonstrated that samples with an a* value greater than or equal to one and b* value greater than eight (light brown and dark brown burned samples) were the most predictive of STR typing success and mtDNA typing success. A decision tree for processing burned bones was constructed based on the color value thresholds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.