筛查工具在癫痫精神并发症管理中的作用是什么?针对最常见合并症的工具和实用技巧:抑郁和焦虑

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy and Behavior Reports Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100654
Kelly Conner , Milena Gandy , Heidi M. Munger-Clary
{"title":"筛查工具在癫痫精神并发症管理中的作用是什么?针对最常见合并症的工具和实用技巧:抑郁和焦虑","authors":"Kelly Conner ,&nbsp;Milena Gandy ,&nbsp;Heidi M. Munger-Clary","doi":"10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Depression and anxiety are the most common psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and are known to increase healthcare utilization, the risk of refractory epilepsy, and anti-seizure medication intolerability. Despite this, depression and anxiety continue to be underrecognized and undertreated in people with epilepsy (PWE). Several barriers to the identification of depression and anxiety in PWE exist, including reliance on unstructured interviews rather than standardized, validated instruments. Moreover, there is a dearth of behavioral health providers to manage these comorbidities once identified. The use of validated screening instruments in epilepsy clinics can assist with both the identification of psychiatric symptoms and monitoring of treatment response by the epilepsy clinician for PWE with comorbid depression and/or anxiety. While screening instruments can identify psychiatric symptoms occurring within a specified time, they are not definitively diagnostic. Screeners can be time efficient tools to identify patients requiring further evaluation for diagnostic confirmation.</p><p>This article reviews recent literature on the utility of depression and anxiety screening instruments in epilepsy care, including commonly used screening instruments, and provides solutions for potential barriers to clinical implementation. Validated depression and anxiety screening instruments can increase identification of depression and anxiety and guide epilepsy clinician management of these comorbidities which has the potential to positively impact patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36558,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258998642400011X/pdfft?md5=cf10507faafb9ccd3b138d52afb59fb3&pid=1-s2.0-S258998642400011X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the role of screening instruments in the management of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy? Tools and practical tips for the most common comorbidities: Depression and anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Conner ,&nbsp;Milena Gandy ,&nbsp;Heidi M. Munger-Clary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Depression and anxiety are the most common psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and are known to increase healthcare utilization, the risk of refractory epilepsy, and anti-seizure medication intolerability. Despite this, depression and anxiety continue to be underrecognized and undertreated in people with epilepsy (PWE). Several barriers to the identification of depression and anxiety in PWE exist, including reliance on unstructured interviews rather than standardized, validated instruments. Moreover, there is a dearth of behavioral health providers to manage these comorbidities once identified. The use of validated screening instruments in epilepsy clinics can assist with both the identification of psychiatric symptoms and monitoring of treatment response by the epilepsy clinician for PWE with comorbid depression and/or anxiety. While screening instruments can identify psychiatric symptoms occurring within a specified time, they are not definitively diagnostic. Screeners can be time efficient tools to identify patients requiring further evaluation for diagnostic confirmation.</p><p>This article reviews recent literature on the utility of depression and anxiety screening instruments in epilepsy care, including commonly used screening instruments, and provides solutions for potential barriers to clinical implementation. Validated depression and anxiety screening instruments can increase identification of depression and anxiety and guide epilepsy clinician management of these comorbidities which has the potential to positively impact patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258998642400011X/pdfft?md5=cf10507faafb9ccd3b138d52afb59fb3&pid=1-s2.0-S258998642400011X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258998642400011X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy and Behavior Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258998642400011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁和焦虑是癫痫患者最常见的精神并发症,已知会增加医疗保健的使用、难治性癫痫的风险和抗癫痫药物的不耐受性。尽管如此,抑郁和焦虑在癫痫患者(PWE)中仍未得到充分认识和治疗。在识别癫痫患者的抑郁和焦虑方面存在一些障碍,包括依赖非结构化访谈,而不是标准化的有效工具。此外,一旦发现这些合并症,缺乏行为健康提供者来管理这些合并症。在癫痫诊所使用经过验证的筛查工具可以帮助癫痫临床医生识别精神症状,并监测合并抑郁和/或焦虑的患者的治疗反应。虽然筛查工具可以识别在特定时间内出现的精神症状,但它们并不是明确的诊断工具。本文回顾了近期有关抑郁和焦虑筛查工具在癫痫护理中的实用性的文献,包括常用的筛查工具,并针对临床实施中的潜在障碍提供了解决方案。经过验证的抑郁和焦虑筛查工具可提高对抑郁和焦虑的识别率,并指导癫痫临床医生对这些合并症进行管理,这有可能对患者护理产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the role of screening instruments in the management of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy? Tools and practical tips for the most common comorbidities: Depression and anxiety

Depression and anxiety are the most common psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and are known to increase healthcare utilization, the risk of refractory epilepsy, and anti-seizure medication intolerability. Despite this, depression and anxiety continue to be underrecognized and undertreated in people with epilepsy (PWE). Several barriers to the identification of depression and anxiety in PWE exist, including reliance on unstructured interviews rather than standardized, validated instruments. Moreover, there is a dearth of behavioral health providers to manage these comorbidities once identified. The use of validated screening instruments in epilepsy clinics can assist with both the identification of psychiatric symptoms and monitoring of treatment response by the epilepsy clinician for PWE with comorbid depression and/or anxiety. While screening instruments can identify psychiatric symptoms occurring within a specified time, they are not definitively diagnostic. Screeners can be time efficient tools to identify patients requiring further evaluation for diagnostic confirmation.

This article reviews recent literature on the utility of depression and anxiety screening instruments in epilepsy care, including commonly used screening instruments, and provides solutions for potential barriers to clinical implementation. Validated depression and anxiety screening instruments can increase identification of depression and anxiety and guide epilepsy clinician management of these comorbidities which has the potential to positively impact patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports
Epilepsy and Behavior Reports Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Using the hospital anxiety and depression scale in people with epilepsy: Is overlapping symptomatology a problem? Association of oxcarbazepine concentration with seizure frequency in pregnant women with epilepsy Chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation: A promising therapy for motor cortex seizures Metaphoric language in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Time to move forward Analyses of patients who self-administered diazepam nasal spray for acute treatment of seizure clusters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1